Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA 7
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2011
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 107528
interpreted = N
texte = I too think that removal of the globals directory is a retrograde = decision for the same reason as Brian makes. I have a number of sites that rely on the globals directory to serve = data and common include files, this system will be useless if I move to = v7. Regards Stuart Tremain IDFK Web Developments AUSTRALIA webdna@idfk.com.au On 26/10/2011, at 8:02 AM, Brian B. Burton wrote: > On Oct 25, 2011, at 2:21 PM, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: >> Commerce tags are still there but since WebDNA 7 runs at vhost level, = there is no need anymore for global directory or sandboxes. Pre/post = parsing are not active anymore (was loaded from the /global directory); = the pre or post parsing code was automatically included on *any* page = request, before or after any other WebDNA code on that page has been = parsed. A need for extra power... >=20 >=20 > I have some concerns about this. I've recently started moving and = recoding all of my pages to use the globals folder to hold include files = and db files. This greatly simplifies my coding because I no longer have = to keep track of the my page (nested in directories) in relationship to = the database files. (in a way making the database tags location = agnostic) If i'm to understand what you've written, I now not only have = to undo this, but I have to once again manually manage all of my path = statements. If so, this seems like a step in the wrong direction. >=20 >=20 > Brian B. Burton > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list
. > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
I too think that removal of the globals directory is a retrograde = decision for the same reason as Brian makes. I have a number of sites that rely on the globals directory to serve = data and common include files, this system will be useless if I move to = v7. Regards Stuart Tremain IDFK Web Developments AUSTRALIA webdna@idfk.com.au On 26/10/2011, at 8:02 AM, Brian B. Burton wrote: > On Oct 25, 2011, at 2:21 PM, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: >> Commerce tags are still there but since WebDNA 7 runs at vhost level, = there is no need anymore for global directory or sandboxes. Pre/post = parsing are not active anymore (was loaded from the /global directory); = the pre or post parsing code was automatically included on *any* page = request, before or after any other WebDNA code on that page has been = parsed. A need for extra power... >=20 >=20 > I have some concerns about this. I've recently started moving and = recoding all of my pages to use the globals folder to hold include files = and db files. This greatly simplifies my coding because I no longer have = to keep track of the my page (nested in directories) in relationship to = the database files. (in a way making the database tags location = agnostic) If i'm to understand what you've written, I now not only have = to undo this, but I have to once again manually manage all of my path = statements. If so, this seems like a step in the wrong direction. >=20 >=20 > Brian B. Burton > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
Stuart Tremain
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
psst (1997)
(1997)
Exclamation point (1997)
apostrophe in search item (1997)
Large sites (2003)
[WebDNA] AJAX WebDNA module (2009)
PSC recommends what date format yr 2000??? (1997)
[WebDNA] Formatting numbers - truncation instead of rounding (2011)
RE: Promise of future help (1998)
Summ=T Problem (1997)
WebCat2 several catalogs? (1997)
WebCat2b15MacPlugin - [protect] (1997)
HELP WITH DATES (1997)
New Weird Behavior (bug report) (2000)
OT: javascript help (2003)
Max Record length restated as maybe bug (1997)
OT: someone to take over some small customers (2001)
searchable list archive (1997)
Multiple fields on 1 input (1997)
Weird Cookie Problem - your answer (2007)