Re: [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width])
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2012
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 108198
interpreted = N
texte = > For me this just goes back to my college database theory class where I = learned that, no matter what, you should never ever use any reserved = word as a variable name. Even when, in this case, it seems completely = valid. >=20 > -Matt >=20 sure, I agree. but where in the manual is it shown that [width] is used = by any part of the webdna language? -G
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
> For me this just goes back to my college database theory class where I = learned that, no matter what, you should never ever use any reserved = word as a variable name. Even when, in this case, it seems completely = valid. >=20 > -Matt >=20 sure, I agree. but where in the manual is it shown that [width] is used = by any part of the webdna language? -G
Govinda
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
search engine friendly URLS (Mac) and Lycos! (1998)
[OT] Internet Access (2003)
hideif glitch (2003)
Secure Server (1997)
Web Site Hosting (2000)
WebDNA vs PHP (2003)
[OT] Redhat 6.1 (2003)
3.0 [TEXT] variables (1998)
Web Catalog 2 demo (1997)
emailer (1998)
Formulas.db (1997)
ampersand XHTML in search (2006)
Num Sort Descending (2004)
Re:Copyright ? (1997)
WebCat2b13 Mac plugin - [sendmail] and checkboxes (1997)
Show if file exists (2004)
Searching blank fields problem (1999)
Cannot calculate prices (1997)
Help name our technology! (1997)
Return records from another (1997)