Re: [WebDNA] No more SQL in 7.1?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2012


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 108471
interpreted = N
texte = --Apple-Mail-A7CBBBFA-67A9-492C-AAC6-0BD2BDEDC51F Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Christophe.=20 It sounds like some of your customers want SQL to stay.=20 Why not activate it when you buy a eccelerator license? People want it, you= need to make money. Almost every free app store app works that way. Pay t= o get the full features.=20 I've got 200 websites and truthfully none are busy enough to require an acc= elerator, but some use SQL because I can take over someone else's SQL websit= e and I can build on it with WenDNA.=20 SQL brings me customers. I'll pay for the features.=20 Frank On Feb 2, 2012, at 1:52 PM, aaronmichaelmusic@gmail.com wrote: > I agree as well. =20 >=20 > But as the saying goes, you pick the right tool for the job. =46rom what I= can tell, there is no one-size-fits-all solution. =20 >=20 > So, to me, one of the other great features of WebDNA is also its ability t= o work with SQL. Options, choices, and flexibility are great things. It is= a little bit worry-some if one of those choices may disappear. I can under= stand commerce tags, but SQL is not going out of style. It's not an industr= y standard for no reason, albeit more burdensome to work with than WebDNA na= tive dbs for instance. I think that a +SQL and -SQL version of WebDNA is ap= propriate, but I would hate to see it go all together. >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Feb 2, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Stuart Tremain wrote: >=20 >> Chris >>=20 >> I agree totally. >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> On 03/02/2012, at 10:09 AM, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: >>=20 >>> If i were to name the greatest WebDNA feature, i would say it is its emb= edded ultrafast database system. It is so simple to use, so fast, so easy to= learn that i hardly imagine a newcomer going the MySQL way... >>=20 >> --------------------------------------------------------- This message is= sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe= , E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporti= ng: support@webdna.us >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- This message is s= ent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E= -mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting:= support@webdna.us --Apple-Mail-A7CBBBFA-67A9-492C-AAC6-0BD2BDEDC51F Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Christophe. 

It sounds like some of your customers want SQL to stay.&nbs= p;

Why not activate it when you buy a eccelerator&nb= sp;license?  People want it, you need to make money.  Almost every= free app store app  works that way. Pay to get the full features. = ;

I've got  200 websites and truthfu= lly none are busy enough to require an accelerator, but some use S= QL because I can take over someone else's SQL website and I can build on it w= ith WenDNA. 

SQL brings me customers. I= 'll pay for the features. 

Frank



On Feb 2, 2012, at 1:52 PM, aaronmichaelmusic@gmail.com wrote:

<= blockquote type=3D"cite">
I agree as well.  

But= as the saying goes, you pick the right tool for the job.  =46rom what I= can tell, there is no one-size-fits-all solution.  

So, to me, one of the other great features of WebDNA is also its abil= ity to work with SQL.  Options, choices, and flexibility are great thin= gs.  It is a little bit worry-some if one of those choices may disappea= r.  I can understand commerce tags, but SQL is not going out of style. &= nbsp;It's not an industry standard for no reason, albeit more burdensome to w= ork with than WebDNA native dbs for instance.  I think that a +SQL and -= SQL version of WebDNA is appropriate, but I would hate to see it go all toge= ther.



On Fe= b 2, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Stuart Tremain wrote:

Chris
I agree totally.



On 03/02/2012, at 10:09 AM, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote:
If i w= ere to name the greatest WebDNA feature, i would say it is its embedded ultr= afast database system. It is so simple to use, so fast, so easy to learn tha= t i hardly imagine a newcomer going the MySQL way...

--------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: http://mail.= webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us

--------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: http://mail.= webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
= --Apple-Mail-A7CBBBFA-67A9-492C-AAC6-0BD2BDEDC51F-- Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] No more SQL in 7.1? (Govinda 2012)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] No more SQL in 7.1? (sal danna 2012)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] No more SQL in 7.1? (Jeffrey Jones 2012)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] No more SQL in 7.1? (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] No more SQL in 7.1? (frank@cwolfe.com 2012)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] No more SQL in 7.1? (Govinda 2012)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] No more SQL in 7.1? (sal danna 2012)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] No more SQL in 7.1? (aaronmichaelmusic@gmail.com 2012)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] No more SQL in 7.1? (Kenneth Grome 2012)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] No more SQL in 7.1? (Govinda 2012)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] No more SQL in 7.1? (Kenneth Grome 2012)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] No more SQL in 7.1? (Donovan Brooke 2012)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] No more SQL in 7.1? ("Psi Prime Inc, Matthew A Perosi " 2012)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] No more SQL in 7.1? (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] No more SQL in 7.1? (Stuart Tremain 2012)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] No more SQL in 7.1? (frank@cwolfe.com 2012)
  17. Re: [WebDNA] No more SQL in 7.1? (aaronmichaelmusic@gmail.com 2012)
  18. Re: [WebDNA] No more SQL in 7.1? (Stuart Tremain 2012)
  19. Re: [WebDNA] No more SQL in 7.1? (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  20. Re: [WebDNA] No more SQL in 7.1? (Govinda 2012)
  21. Re: [WebDNA] No more SQL in 7.1? (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  22. Re: [WebDNA] No more SQL in 7.1? (Stuart Tremain 2012)
  23. Re: [WebDNA] No more SQL in 7.1? (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  24. Re: [WebDNA] No more SQL in 7.1? (aaronmichaelmusic@gmail.com 2012)
  25. Re: [WebDNA] No more SQL in 7.1? (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  26. Re: [WebDNA] No more SQL in 7.1? (bob.minor@cybermill.com 2012)
  27. Re: [WebDNA] No more SQL in 7.1? (Donovan Brooke 2012)
  28. Re: [WebDNA] No more SQL in 7.1? (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  29. [WebDNA] No more SQL in 7.1? (aaronmichaelmusic@gmail.com 2012)
--Apple-Mail-A7CBBBFA-67A9-492C-AAC6-0BD2BDEDC51F Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Christophe.=20 It sounds like some of your customers want SQL to stay.=20 Why not activate it when you buy a eccelerator license? People want it, you= need to make money. Almost every free app store app works that way. Pay t= o get the full features.=20 I've got 200 websites and truthfully none are busy enough to require an acc= elerator, but some use SQL because I can take over someone else's SQL websit= e and I can build on it with WenDNA.=20 SQL brings me customers. I'll pay for the features.=20 Frank On Feb 2, 2012, at 1:52 PM, aaronmichaelmusic@gmail.com wrote: > I agree as well. =20 >=20 > But as the saying goes, you pick the right tool for the job. =46rom what I= can tell, there is no one-size-fits-all solution. =20 >=20 > So, to me, one of the other great features of WebDNA is also its ability t= o work with SQL. Options, choices, and flexibility are great things. It is= a little bit worry-some if one of those choices may disappear. I can under= stand commerce tags, but SQL is not going out of style. It's not an industr= y standard for no reason, albeit more burdensome to work with than WebDNA na= tive dbs for instance. I think that a +SQL and -SQL version of WebDNA is ap= propriate, but I would hate to see it go all together. >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Feb 2, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Stuart Tremain wrote: >=20 >> Chris >>=20 >> I agree totally. >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> On 03/02/2012, at 10:09 AM, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: >>=20 >>> If i were to name the greatest WebDNA feature, i would say it is its emb= edded ultrafast database system. It is so simple to use, so fast, so easy to= learn that i hardly imagine a newcomer going the MySQL way... >>=20 >> --------------------------------------------------------- This message is= sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe= , E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporti= ng: support@webdna.us >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- This message is s= ent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E= -mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting:= support@webdna.us --Apple-Mail-A7CBBBFA-67A9-492C-AAC6-0BD2BDEDC51F Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Christophe. 

It sounds like some of your customers want SQL to stay.&nbs= p;

Why not activate it when you buy a eccelerator&nb= sp;license?  People want it, you need to make money.  Almost every= free app store app  works that way. Pay to get the full features. = ;

I've got  200 websites and truthfu= lly none are busy enough to require an accelerator, but some use S= QL because I can take over someone else's SQL website and I can build on it w= ith WenDNA. 

SQL brings me customers. I= 'll pay for the features. 

Frank



On Feb 2, 2012, at 1:52 PM, aaronmichaelmusic@gmail.com wrote:

<= blockquote type=3D"cite">
I agree as well.  

But= as the saying goes, you pick the right tool for the job.  =46rom what I= can tell, there is no one-size-fits-all solution.  

So, to me, one of the other great features of WebDNA is also its abil= ity to work with SQL.  Options, choices, and flexibility are great thin= gs.  It is a little bit worry-some if one of those choices may disappea= r.  I can understand commerce tags, but SQL is not going out of style. &= nbsp;It's not an industry standard for no reason, albeit more burdensome to w= ork with than WebDNA native dbs for instance.  I think that a +SQL and -= SQL version of WebDNA is appropriate, but I would hate to see it go all toge= ther.



On Fe= b 2, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Stuart Tremain wrote:

Chris
I agree totally.



On 03/02/2012, at 10:09 AM, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote:
If i w= ere to name the greatest WebDNA feature, i would say it is its embedded ultr= afast database system. It is so simple to use, so fast, so easy to learn tha= t i hardly imagine a newcomer going the MySQL way...

--------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: http://mail.= webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us

--------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: http://mail.= webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
= --Apple-Mail-A7CBBBFA-67A9-492C-AAC6-0BD2BDEDC51F-- frank@cwolfe.com

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [shownext method=post] ??? (1997) listfiles-looking for slick solution (1997) Talk List Suggestions (1997) date format (another question) (2000) [newcart] (1998) A little help on e-mail (HELP!!! :-) ) (1998) User/pass with tcpconnect (2000) Windows-based Code Editor (2002) suffix mapping for NT? (1997) document contains no data (1999) [WebDNA] showif with empty variable (2015) Signal Raised Error (1997) Empty Shopping Carts? (1998) Working Days - Corrected (2004) WCS Newbie question (1997) WebCat2: multiple currency support (1997) required fields (1999) no [search] with NT (1997) requiring form fields? (2000) Variable Prices (1998)