Re: More on the email templates

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1997


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 11044
interpreted = N
texte = >Okay. For now we will live with the tags webmerchant supports. Is >webmerchant's understanding of tags going to be expanded in a later >version?We certainly intend to make it more full-featured, but we're leaning towards a slightly different way of solving it. Rather than give WebMerchant more WebDNA (which might be bad: do you really want yet another program to hold a possibly-unsunchronized database?), we are thinking of making it purely an account authorizor which then communicates back to WebCatalog whether the payment was good or not. Then WebCatalog would have the knowledge it needs to send out WebDNA emails about the status of the payment.Either way, you get what you want, which is better email support for fully-automated commerce sites.Grant Hulbert, V.P. Engineering | ===== Tools for WebWarriors ===== Pacific Coast Software | WebCatalog Pro, WebCommerce Solution 11770 Bernardo Plaza Court, #453 | SiteEdit Pro, SiteCheck, PhotoMaster San Diego, CA 92128 | SiteGuard 619/675-1106 Fax: 619/675-0372 | http://www.smithmicro.com Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: More on the email templates (Sven U. Grenander 1997)
  2. Re: More on the email templates (I like it) (w curt eggemeyer 1997)
  3. Re: More on the email templates (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  4. Re: More on the email templates (w curt eggemeyer 1997)
  5. Re: More on the email templates (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  6. Re: More on the email templates (w curt eggemeyer 1997)
  7. Re: More on the email templates (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  8. Re: More on the email templates (w curt eggemeyer 1997)
  9. Re: More on the email templates (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  10. More on the email templates (w curt eggemeyer 1997)
>Okay. For now we will live with the tags webmerchant supports. Is >webmerchant's understanding of tags going to be expanded in a later >version?We certainly intend to make it more full-featured, but we're leaning towards a slightly different way of solving it. Rather than give WebMerchant more WebDNA (which might be bad: do you really want yet another program to hold a possibly-unsunchronized database?), we are thinking of making it purely an account authorizor which then communicates back to WebCatalog whether the payment was good or not. Then WebCatalog would have the knowledge it needs to send out WebDNA emails about the status of the payment.Either way, you get what you want, which is better email support for fully-automated commerce sites.Grant Hulbert, V.P. Engineering | ===== Tools for WebWarriors ===== Pacific Coast Software | WebCatalog Pro, WebCommerce Solution 11770 Bernardo Plaza Court, #453 | SiteEdit Pro, SiteCheck, PhotoMaster San Diego, CA 92128 | SiteGuard 619/675-1106 Fax: 619/675-0372 | http://www.smithmicro.com Grant Hulbert

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

State DB & TIme Zones (2003) Problems reading files created by WC (1997) Three new problems, maybe a fourth (1997) WebCat2b12--[searchstring] bug (1997) WebCat2 - [include] tags (1997) [WebDNA] CSS Advice (2008) Still More on EudoraPro Email (1998) WebCat2 several catalogs? (1997) [AppendFile] problem (WebCat2b13 Mac .acgi) (1997) Redirect to anchor (2001) shownext (1997) Re:Problem displaying search result (1997) serial number dishing (1997) [WebDNA] Apply discount using a line item (2011) WebCat & Liststar (1997) webcat 2.1 new cart fields - please explain more (1998) Problem with Midnight (2003) WC2f3 (1997) problems with 2 tags shakur (1997) Error:Too many nested [xxx] contexts (1997)