Re: [WebDNA] [createdate] displays today's date on Ubuntu 14.04 /

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2014


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 111795
interpreted = N
texte = --e89a8fb202142d8697050a996c1f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Donavan, are you working for/with WSC again? ------------------------------------ Sent from phone -Dan Strong http://DanStrong.com On Dec 19, 2014 2:34 PM, "Stuart Tremain" wrote: > [VERSION] =E2=80=98should=E2=80=99 do that > > > Regards > > Stuart Tremain > IDFK Web Developments > AUSTRALIA > webdna@idfk.com.au > > > > > > On 20 Dec 2014, at 9:31 am, Kenneth Grome > wrote: > > > > I specified "Server" twice, once in the subject and again in the > > body. But I could not specify the version number (thus the > > question marks in both the subject and body), here's why: > > > > Chris sent me the first version/build that was supposed to run on > > Ubuntu 14.04. I discovered a couple bugs after installing and > > running it for the first time so I reported these issues. It > > didn't take him long to fix them both and send me a new build. > > > > However ... > > > > The new build did not come with a version number or a build number > > that I am aware of, so I have no idea how to refer to it -- other > > than to say that it is the first bug-fixed version built and sent > > to me after I first used the new Ubuntu 14.04 installer. > > > > Maybe the take-away here is that WSC can probably do a better job > > of clearly and uniquely numbering every build they produce. Then > > we can specify the build number when we have issues to report. > > > > There's another benefit to uniquely numbering each build too: > > > > We will never have to specify "Server" or "FastCGI" or platform > > any more because WSC will immediately know which one we are having > > problems with simply by looking at the unique build number we give > > them. > > > > So now I have a question: > > > > Isn't it possible to bury a unique build number inside the > > executable itself, and then run a command that returns that build > > number? > > > > It seems to me that Chris gave me instructions for doing this in > > an earlier version, but as far as I know it is not common > > knowledge. In fact I have no idea if it would even work on the > > latest builds -- but if it does we should all learn how to do it > > -- so we can use a simple command to look up the exact build we > > are having trouble with. > > > > Regards, > > Kenneth Grome > > WebDNA Solutions > > http://www.webdnasolutions.com > > Web Database Systems and Linux Server Management > > > > > > On 12/19/2014 04:03 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: > >> This was fixed way back in the beta FastCGI, then I believe it > >> was fixed in the Server platform as well (off the top of my > >> head). > >> > >> However, it=E2=80=99s not impossible that a certain build missed the > >> fix. That=E2=80=99s why when reporting bugs that you should always > >> list Server/FastCGI [platform] [version], etc.. > >> > >> Donovan > >> > >> > >> > >> On Dec 19, 2014, at 3:54 PM, iPhonzie@G > >> wrote: > >> > >>> [createdate] hasn=E2=80=99t worked since WebCatalog was ported to > >>> *nix=E2=80=A6 it has always returned the =E2=80=9Clast opened date=E2= =80=9D rather > >>> than the file creation date. I=E2=80=99m pretty sure I reported this > >>> to Smith Micro a decade ago. I=E2=80=99m running WebDNA 6, so I > >>> don=E2=80=99t know if it was ever fixed in a more recent build. > >>> > >>> -- Brian Fries Sent with Airmail > >>> > >>> On December 19, 2014 at 1:40:51 PM, Donovan Brooke > >>> (dbrooke@euca.us) wrote: > >>> > >>>> Would this be Server or FastCGI? > >>>> > >>>> Donovan > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Dec 19, 2014, at 1:49 PM, Kenneth Grome > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I'm using a bug-fixed version of WebDNA (Server 8.?) on > >>>>> Ubuntu 14.04 and I just discovered that [createdate] > >>>>> displays today's date on all files inside a [listfiles] > >>>>> context ... but the [moddate] tag seems to work okay. > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards, Kenneth Grome WebDNA Solutions > >>>>> http://www.webdnasolutions.com Web Database Systems and > >>>>> Linux Server Management > > --------------------------------------------------------- > > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > > the mailing list . > > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us > > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us > --e89a8fb202142d8697050a996c1f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Donavan,=C2=A0 are you working for/with WSC again?

------------------------------------
Sent from phone

-Dan Strong
http://DanStrong.com

On Dec 19, 2014 2:34 PM, "Stuart Tremain&qu= ot; <webdna@idfk.com.au> wr= ote:
[VERSION] =E2= =80=98should=E2=80=99 do that


Regards

Stuart Tremain
IDFK Web Developments
AUSTRALIA
webdna@idfk.com.au




> On 20 Dec 2014, at 9:31 am, Kenneth Grome <ken@webdnasolutions.com> wrote:
>
> I specified "Server" twice, once in the subject and again in= the
> body.=C2=A0 But I could not specify the version number (thus the
> question marks in both the subject and body), here's why:
>
> Chris sent me the first version/build that was supposed to run on
> Ubuntu 14.04.=C2=A0 I discovered a couple bugs after installing and > running it for the first time so I reported these issues.=C2=A0 It
> didn't take him long to fix them both and send me a new build.
>
> However ...
>
> The new build did not come with a version number or a build number
> that I am aware of, so I have no idea how to refer to it -- other
> than to say that it is the first bug-fixed version built and sent
> to me after I first used the new Ubuntu 14.04 installer.
>
> Maybe the take-away here is that WSC can probably do a better job
> of clearly and uniquely numbering every build they produce.=C2=A0 Then=
> we can specify the build number when we have issues to report.
>
> There's another benefit to uniquely numbering each build too:
>
> We will never have to specify "Server" or "FastCGI"= ; or platform
> any more because WSC will immediately know which one we are having
> problems with simply by looking at the unique build number we give
> them.
>
> So now I have a question:
>
> Isn't it possible to bury a unique build number inside the
> executable itself, and then run a command that returns that build
> number?
>
> It seems to me that Chris gave me instructions for doing this in
> an earlier version, but as far as I know it is not common
> knowledge.=C2=A0 In fact I have no idea if it would even work on the > latest builds -- but if it does we should all learn how to do it
> -- so we can use a simple command to look up the exact build we
> are having trouble with.
>
> Regards,
> Kenneth Grome
> WebDNA Solutions
> http://ww= w.webdnasolutions.com
> Web Database Systems and Linux Server Management
>
>
> On 12/19/2014 04:03 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote:
>> This was fixed way back in the beta FastCGI, then I believe it
>> was fixed in the Server platform as well (off the top of my
>> head).
>>
>> However, it=E2=80=99s not impossible that a certain build missed t= he
>> fix. That=E2=80=99s why when reporting bugs that you should always=
>> list Server/FastCGI [platform] [version], etc..
>>
>> Donovan
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 19, 2014, at 3:54 PM, iPhonzie@G <iphonzie@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> [createdate] hasn=E2=80=99t worked since WebCatalog was ported= to
>>> *nix=E2=80=A6 it has always returned the =E2=80=9Clast opened = date=E2=80=9D rather
>>> than the file creation date. I=E2=80=99m pretty sure I reporte= d this
>>> to Smith Micro a decade ago. I=E2=80=99m running WebDNA 6, so = I
>>> don=E2=80=99t know if it was ever fixed in a more recent build= .
>>>
>>> -- Brian Fries Sent with Airmail
>>>
>>> On December 19, 2014 at 1:40:51 PM, Donovan Brooke
>>> (dbrooke@euca.us) wrote= :
>>>
>>>> Would this be Server or FastCGI?
>>>>
>>>> Donovan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 19, 2014, at 1:49 PM, Kenneth Grome
>>>> <ken@webdnas= olutions.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm using a bug-fixed version of WebDNA (Server 8.= ?) on
>>>>> Ubuntu 14.04 and I just discovered that [createdate] >>>>> displays today's date on all files inside a [listf= iles]
>>>>> context ... but the [moddate] tag seems to work okay.<= br> >>>>>
>>>>> Regards, Kenneth Grome WebDNA Solutions
>>>>> http://www.webdnasolutions.com Web Database Systems and
>>>>> Linux Server Management
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
> the mailing list <talk@webdna.us<= /a>>.
> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <
talk-leave@webdna.us>
> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us
> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us<= /a>

---------------------------------------------------------
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list <
talk@webdna.us&g= t;.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <talk= -leave@webdna.us>
archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us
Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
--e89a8fb202142d8697050a996c1f-- Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] [createdate] displays today's date on Ubuntu 14.04 / WebDNA Server 8.? (Stuart Tremain 2014)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] [createdate] displays today's date on Ubuntu 14.04 / WebDNA Server 8.? (Michael Davis 2014)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] [createdate] displays today's date on Ubuntu 14.04 / (Kenneth Grome 2014)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] [createdate] displays today's date on Ubuntu 14.04 / (Dan Strong 2014)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] [createdate] displays today's date on Ubuntu 14.04 / WebDNA Server 8.? (Stuart Tremain 2014)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] [createdate] displays today's date on Ubuntu 14.04 / (Kenneth Grome 2014)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] [createdate] displays today's date on Ubuntu 14.04 / WebDNA Server 8.? (Donovan Brooke 2014)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] [createdate] displays today's date on Ubuntu 14.04 / WebDNA Server 8.? (Donovan Brooke 2014)
  9. [WebDNA] [createdate] displays today's date on Ubuntu 14.04 / WebDNA Server (Kenneth Grome 2014)
--e89a8fb202142d8697050a996c1f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Donavan, are you working for/with WSC again? ------------------------------------ Sent from phone -Dan Strong http://DanStrong.com On Dec 19, 2014 2:34 PM, "Stuart Tremain" wrote: > [version] =E2=80=98should=E2=80=99 do that > > > Regards > > Stuart Tremain > IDFK Web Developments > AUSTRALIA > webdna@idfk.com.au > > > > > > On 20 Dec 2014, at 9:31 am, Kenneth Grome > wrote: > > > > I specified "Server" twice, once in the subject and again in the > > body. But I could not specify the version number (thus the > > question marks in both the subject and body), here's why: > > > > Chris sent me the first version/build that was supposed to run on > > Ubuntu 14.04. I discovered a couple bugs after installing and > > running it for the first time so I reported these issues. It > > didn't take him long to fix them both and send me a new build. > > > > However ... > > > > The new build did not come with a version number or a build number > > that I am aware of, so I have no idea how to refer to it -- other > > than to say that it is the first bug-fixed version built and sent > > to me after I first used the new Ubuntu 14.04 installer. > > > > Maybe the take-away here is that WSC can probably do a better job > > of clearly and uniquely numbering every build they produce. Then > > we can specify the build number when we have issues to report. > > > > There's another benefit to uniquely numbering each build too: > > > > We will never have to specify "Server" or "FastCGI" or platform > > any more because WSC will immediately know which one we are having > > problems with simply by looking at the unique build number we give > > them. > > > > So now I have a question: > > > > Isn't it possible to bury a unique build number inside the > > executable itself, and then run a command that returns that build > > number? > > > > It seems to me that Chris gave me instructions for doing this in > > an earlier version, but as far as I know it is not common > > knowledge. In fact I have no idea if it would even work on the > > latest builds -- but if it does we should all learn how to do it > > -- so we can use a simple command to look up the exact build we > > are having trouble with. > > > > Regards, > > Kenneth Grome > > WebDNA Solutions > > http://www.webdnasolutions.com > > Web Database Systems and Linux Server Management > > > > > > On 12/19/2014 04:03 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: > >> This was fixed way back in the beta FastCGI, then I believe it > >> was fixed in the Server platform as well (off the top of my > >> head). > >> > >> However, it=E2=80=99s not impossible that a certain build missed the > >> fix. That=E2=80=99s why when reporting bugs that you should always > >> list Server/FastCGI [platform] [version], etc.. > >> > >> Donovan > >> > >> > >> > >> On Dec 19, 2014, at 3:54 PM, iPhonzie@G > >> wrote: > >> > >>> [createdate] hasn=E2=80=99t worked since WebCatalog was ported to > >>> *nix=E2=80=A6 it has always returned the =E2=80=9Clast opened date=E2= =80=9D rather > >>> than the file creation date. I=E2=80=99m pretty sure I reported this > >>> to Smith Micro a decade ago. I=E2=80=99m running WebDNA 6, so I > >>> don=E2=80=99t know if it was ever fixed in a more recent build. > >>> > >>> -- Brian Fries Sent with Airmail > >>> > >>> On December 19, 2014 at 1:40:51 PM, Donovan Brooke > >>> (dbrooke@euca.us) wrote: > >>> > >>>> Would this be Server or FastCGI? > >>>> > >>>> Donovan > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Dec 19, 2014, at 1:49 PM, Kenneth Grome > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I'm using a bug-fixed version of WebDNA (Server 8.?) on > >>>>> Ubuntu 14.04 and I just discovered that [createdate] > >>>>> displays today's date on all files inside a [listfiles] > >>>>> context ... but the [moddate] tag seems to work okay. > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards, Kenneth Grome WebDNA Solutions > >>>>> http://www.webdnasolutions.com Web Database Systems and > >>>>> Linux Server Management > > --------------------------------------------------------- > > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > > the mailing list . > > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us > > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us > --e89a8fb202142d8697050a996c1f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Donavan,=C2=A0 are you working for/with WSC again?

------------------------------------
Sent from phone

-Dan Strong
http://DanStrong.com

On Dec 19, 2014 2:34 PM, "Stuart Tremain&qu= ot; <webdna@idfk.com.au> wr= ote:
[version] =E2= =80=98should=E2=80=99 do that


Regards

Stuart Tremain
IDFK Web Developments
AUSTRALIA
webdna@idfk.com.au




> On 20 Dec 2014, at 9:31 am, Kenneth Grome <ken@webdnasolutions.com> wrote:
>
> I specified "Server" twice, once in the subject and again in= the
> body.=C2=A0 But I could not specify the version number (thus the
> question marks in both the subject and body), here's why:
>
> Chris sent me the first version/build that was supposed to run on
> Ubuntu 14.04.=C2=A0 I discovered a couple bugs after installing and > running it for the first time so I reported these issues.=C2=A0 It
> didn't take him long to fix them both and send me a new build.
>
> However ...
>
> The new build did not come with a version number or a build number
> that I am aware of, so I have no idea how to refer to it -- other
> than to say that it is the first bug-fixed version built and sent
> to me after I first used the new Ubuntu 14.04 installer.
>
> Maybe the take-away here is that WSC can probably do a better job
> of clearly and uniquely numbering every build they produce.=C2=A0 Then=
> we can specify the build number when we have issues to report.
>
> There's another benefit to uniquely numbering each build too:
>
> We will never have to specify "Server" or "FastCGI"= ; or platform
> any more because WSC will immediately know which one we are having
> problems with simply by looking at the unique build number we give
> them.
>
> So now I have a question:
>
> Isn't it possible to bury a unique build number inside the
> executable itself, and then run a command that returns that build
> number?
>
> It seems to me that Chris gave me instructions for doing this in
> an earlier version, but as far as I know it is not common
> knowledge.=C2=A0 In fact I have no idea if it would even work on the > latest builds -- but if it does we should all learn how to do it
> -- so we can use a simple command to look up the exact build we
> are having trouble with.
>
> Regards,
> Kenneth Grome
> WebDNA Solutions
> http://ww= w.webdnasolutions.com
> Web Database Systems and Linux Server Management
>
>
> On 12/19/2014 04:03 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote:
>> This was fixed way back in the beta FastCGI, then I believe it
>> was fixed in the Server platform as well (off the top of my
>> head).
>>
>> However, it=E2=80=99s not impossible that a certain build missed t= he
>> fix. That=E2=80=99s why when reporting bugs that you should always=
>> list Server/FastCGI [platform] [version], etc..
>>
>> Donovan
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 19, 2014, at 3:54 PM, iPhonzie@G <iphonzie@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> [createdate] hasn=E2=80=99t worked since WebCatalog was ported= to
>>> *nix=E2=80=A6 it has always returned the =E2=80=9Clast opened = date=E2=80=9D rather
>>> than the file creation date. I=E2=80=99m pretty sure I reporte= d this
>>> to Smith Micro a decade ago. I=E2=80=99m running WebDNA 6, so = I
>>> don=E2=80=99t know if it was ever fixed in a more recent build= .
>>>
>>> -- Brian Fries Sent with Airmail
>>>
>>> On December 19, 2014 at 1:40:51 PM, Donovan Brooke
>>> (dbrooke@euca.us) wrote= :
>>>
>>>> Would this be Server or FastCGI?
>>>>
>>>> Donovan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 19, 2014, at 1:49 PM, Kenneth Grome
>>>> <ken@webdnas= olutions.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm using a bug-fixed version of WebDNA (Server 8.= ?) on
>>>>> Ubuntu 14.04 and I just discovered that [createdate] >>>>> displays today's date on all files inside a [listf= iles]
>>>>> context ... but the [moddate] tag seems to work okay.<= br> >>>>>
>>>>> Regards, Kenneth Grome WebDNA Solutions
>>>>> http://www.webdnasolutions.com Web Database Systems and
>>>>> Linux Server Management
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
> the mailing list <talk@webdna.us<= /a>>.
> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <
talk-leave@webdna.us>
> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us
> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us<= /a>

---------------------------------------------------------
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list <
talk@webdna.us&g= t;.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <talk= -leave@webdna.us>
archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us
Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
--e89a8fb202142d8697050a996c1f-- Dan Strong

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Undeliverable Mail (1997) controlling user input (1998) My X-Mas Wish (1999) Formulas.db not working (2006) [LOOKUP] (1997) Changing price for a SLU based on options (size, etc.) (1997) DON'T use old cart file! (1997) RE: what characters are replaced for tab and CR? (1998) Record size (1998) PIXO support (1997) HUGE DATABASES (1998) AAgghh!! Help, please. SSL strikes again. (1997) Secure Server (1997) I need Typhoon Pro Tonight! (1999) TRAINING videos - Prove IT. (1998) WebTV, IPAddress, Cookies, IDEAS?? (1998) Robust WebDNA Job Manager / Accountant (2006) [movefile] create stationery files (1998) Simple question (1998) PSC recommends what date format yr 2000??? (1997)