Re: [WebDNA] Wishlist: ignore whitespace in database changes
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2016
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 112943
interpreted = N
texte = 530 I personally believe this extra flexibility allows to deal with database = content the way we want, and allows to treat a single field either as a = date, a number or a text field, or even the tree types in a single page = of code. I think extra rigidity diminishes creativity, and what I like most in = WebDNA is that it behave like a "chameleon" language. It is so flexible = that you can do whatever you want with it, the way you want. I would be interested to read what others have to say about this = requested modification, - chris > On Aug 31, 2016, at 20:08, Brian Burton
wrote: >=20 > Over the years I=E2=80=99ve been bending WebDNA to my will. I=E2=80=99ve= more or less successfully implemented the view and controller ideology = of an MVC framework in WebDNA, and am getting ever closer to doing the = work to get data models working in webDNA. It=E2=80=99s so frustrating = in 2016 to not be able to tag a field in a database as unique or numeric = and let the language deal with it for you when you interact with the = database. I recently wasted more time then I care to admit to making = [delete db=3Dsomedb&leIDdata=3D10000] work because i forgot to add = &IDtype=3Dnum to the code. --------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us .
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
530 I personally believe this extra flexibility allows to deal with database = content the way we want, and allows to treat a single field either as a = date, a number or a text field, or even the tree types in a single page = of code. I think extra rigidity diminishes creativity, and what I like most in = WebDNA is that it behave like a "chameleon" language. It is so flexible = that you can do whatever you want with it, the way you want. I would be interested to read what others have to say about this = requested modification, - chris > On Aug 31, 2016, at 20:08, Brian Burton wrote: >=20 > Over the years I=E2=80=99ve been bending WebDNA to my will. I=E2=80=99ve= more or less successfully implemented the view and controller ideology = of an MVC framework in WebDNA, and am getting ever closer to doing the = work to get data models working in webDNA. It=E2=80=99s so frustrating = in 2016 to not be able to tag a field in a database as unique or numeric = and let the language deal with it for you when you interact with the = database. I recently wasted more time then I care to admit to making = [delete db=3Dsomedb&leIDdata=3D10000] work because i forgot to add = &IDtype=3Dnum to the code. --------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us .
christophe.billiottet@webdna.us
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
RE: SSL and WebCatalog (1997)
PCS Frames (1997)
using showpage and showcart commands (1996)
Separate SSL Server (1997)
webdna dreamweaver extension. (2003)
[WriteFile] problems (1997)
RE:DatabaseHelper (1997)
Date Sorting (1997)
WebDelivery: One step closer !! (1997)
PCS Emailer's role ? (1997)
Path of Events (1999)
problems with 2 tags shakur (1997)
[sendmail]- bcc? (1998)
Simple counter - how? (1997)
Flat-file to XML converter (2006)
WC TableGrinder (1997)
Listfields and foundItems (2002)
SQL Madness (2005)
Permissions Ignored - PLEASE HELP (2003)
WebCatalog 4.0.1b1 is now available (2000)