numero = 13141
interpreted = N
texte = >Ken:>>You can do this! However, you need to use the group concept. Basically,>create a group with one field in it: date. Search that group field in one>way. Create a second group field with the date field as well and search it>the second way. That scenario was one of the reasons for the group variable.When creating a group field, I have to do something like this:But when I designate that new field in other parts of the code, do Iuse group1 or group1field as the proper string for the name ofthat field? In other words, which of the following tags is correct:(1) (2) Sincerely, Ken GromeWebDNA Solutionshttp://www.hui.net/dna/webdna.html
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>Ken:>>You can do this! However, you need to use the group concept. Basically,>create a group with one field in it: date. Search that group field in one>way. Create a second group field with the date field as well and search it>the second way. That scenario was one of the reasons for the group variable.When creating a group field, I have to do something like this:But when I designate that new field in other parts of the code, do Iuse group1 or group1field as the proper string for the name ofthat field? In other words, which of the following tags is correct:(1) [date]>(2) [date]>Sincerely, Ken GromeWebDNA Solutionshttp://www.hui.net/dna/webdna.html
Kenneth Grome
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...