Re: Date search bug?
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1998
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 17705
interpreted = N
texte = Hi everyone,While I still recommend using the date formatting suggestions I made available a few days ago, there may be some of you who really don't want to mess around with a change-over like that ... so here's some CRITICAL information that may help to make your existing date range searches work properly:The following exchange occurred between myself and Grant after I sent him some files that demonstrated the date range search bug I discovered:>>Have you or anyone tracked down the date bug with those files I sent you a>>couple days ago?>>It appears to be the comma between the dates in the range. I removed the>comma and got much better-looking results. Sorry about the delay and the>misinformation.Basically, what this means is that the HTML docs are wrong -- you should NOT use a comma to separate the two values in a date range search. Instead, you should try using a blank space (or possibly a plus sign) to separate the two date values.I still don't know whether or not the earliest date value in a date range search needs to be listed first -- or if the order makes no difference. But putting the earliest date value first has eliminated problems reported with some earlier versions of WebCatalog, so it's probably still a good idea to continue that practice, just to be on the safe side ... :)Sincerely,Ken Grome808-737-6499WebDNA Solutionsmailto:ken@webdna.nethttp://www.webdna.net
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
|
- Re: Date search bug? (Kenneth Grome 1998)
|
Hi everyone,While I still recommend using the date formatting suggestions I made available a few days ago, there may be some of you who really don't want to mess around with a change-over like that ... so here's some CRITICAL information that may help to make your existing date range searches work properly:The following exchange occurred between myself and Grant after I sent him some files that demonstrated the date range search bug I discovered:>>Have you or anyone tracked down the date bug with those files I sent you a>>couple days ago?>>It appears to be the comma between the dates in the range. I removed the>comma and got much better-looking results. Sorry about the delay and the>misinformation.Basically, what this means is that the HTML docs are wrong -- you should NOT use a comma to separate the two values in a date range search. Instead, you should try using a blank space (or possibly a plus sign) to separate the two date values.I still don't know whether or not the earliest date value in a date range search needs to be listed first -- or if the order makes no difference. But putting the earliest date value first has eliminated problems reported with some earlier versions of WebCatalog, so it's probably still a good idea to continue that practice, just to be on the safe side ... :)Sincerely,Ken Grome808-737-6499WebDNA Solutionsmailto:ken@webdna.nethttp://www.webdna.net
Kenneth Grome
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
& in grep (2003)
[Lookup] on secure page not returning anything (2000)
2 easy questions re: [showif] and [sendmail] (1997)
RE: Promise of future help (1998)
' add to cart ' or ' sku ' problem (1998)
WebCat2 beta 11 - new prefs ... (1997)
can webcat create directories on NT? (1997)
Sort Order on a page search (1997)
Opening 'order file'. (1999)
ThreadMem ignored? (1998)
Another webcatalog site!! (1997)
Test (2002)
[WebDNA] Clean URLS job - will pay (2010)
Re:no [search] with NT (1997)
Re:E-mailer application times out (1998)
Attn: Bug in GeneralStore example b15 (1997)
[AppendFile] problem (WebCat2b13 Mac .acgi) (1997)
Paranoid about serial numbers...not (1998)
[OT] Linux -> Winderz (2005)
RE: E-mailer error codes (1997)