unusual search problem

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1998


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 20674
interpreted = N
texte = Here's something that may or may not have a solution:1- I'm creating a bunch of these parameters:by using a search/founditems context on the search page -- to allow tusers to check off as many brandnames as they wish in their searches. In other words, the search must retrieve records having one *OR* more of the brandnames checked -- the *whole* brand name, not just part of it, because some of the brand names have common characters in them.2- On the results page, I'm using this search context:[search otherparameters&wofieldNamedatarq=[formvariables name=brandname&exact=F][url][value][/url]+[/formvariables]]There's only one problem with this technique: The actual search string created by this code makes the plus signs into %20, and that screws up my searches. Here is the parameter created by this code when I check two of the checkboxes:&wofieldNamedatarq=US%20West%20GTE%20... but what I *wanted* for this parameter is:US%20WEST+GTE+So why is webcat replacing + with %20? The plus sign is NOT inside the url context, so shouldn't it be passed as is, without being changed into %20?Is this a bug? Is there a work-around available?Sincerely, Ken Grome 808-737-6499 WebDNA Solutions mailto:ken@webdna.net http://www.webdna.net Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: unusual search problem (John Hill 1998)
  2. Re: unusual search problem (Martin Gertz Bech 1998)
  3. Re: unusual search problem (Kenneth Grome 1998)
  4. Re: unusual search problem (Kenneth Grome 1998)
  5. Re: unusual search problem (John Hill 1998)
  6. Re: unusual search problem (PCS Technical Support 1998)
  7. unusual search problem (Kenneth Grome 1998)
Here's something that may or may not have a solution:1- I'm creating a bunch of these parameters:by using a search/founditems context on the search page -- to allow tusers to check off as many brandnames as they wish in their searches. In other words, the search must retrieve records having one *OR* more of the brandnames checked -- the *whole* brand name, not just part of it, because some of the brand names have common characters in them.2- On the results page, I'm using this search context:[search otherparameters&wofieldNamedatarq=[formvariables name=brandname&exact=F][url][value][/url]+[/formvariables]]There's only one problem with this technique: The actual search string created by this code makes the plus signs into %20, and that screws up my searches. Here is the parameter created by this code when I check two of the checkboxes:&wofieldNamedatarq=US%20West%20GTE%20... but what I *wanted* for this parameter is:US%20WEST+GTE+So why is webcat replacing + with %20? The plus sign is NOT inside the url context, so shouldn't it be passed as is, without being changed into %20?Is this a bug? Is there a work-around available?Sincerely, Ken Grome 808-737-6499 WebDNA Solutions mailto:ken@webdna.net http://www.webdna.net Kenneth Grome

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Banner Ad example (Typhoon) and WebCatalog (1997) RE: is sku a REQUIRED field on NT (1997) [LOOKUP] (1997) textA (1998) [SHOWIF]s and empty arguments (1997) normal users.db calls ... (1998) ImageMagick (2005) Multiply prices (1997) America Online Issues (1998) Catalogs and W* (1996) Help! WebCat2 bug (1997) GetWords (2004) return missing item (was:WebCat Sales) (1997) Emailer port change (1997) Can't add a field (1998) Tab Charactor (1997) New command suggestion (1997) Search context not finding recent entries (1998) RE: Cart Template (1997) I guess I have a problem with commitment (2003)