RE: speed of TCPConnect?
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1998
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 21435
interpreted = N
texte = Thanks Grant,I'll optimize my application to minimize the connections using textvariables and some local caching. On the first couple of connections, it'sstill fast!Aloha, Olin> -----Original Message-----> From: Grant Hulbert [mailto:granth@smithmicro.com]> Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 1998 12:57 PM> To: WebDNA-Talk@smithmicro.com> Subject: Re: speed of TCPConnect?>>> >Building a system where I want to connect some webcat pages to a Java> >Application Server which ties into an Oracle database.> TCPConnect works like> >a charm ;) However, what happens when I start embedding about a dozen> >TCPConnect calls? I remember a thread once saying that the [dos] context> >took about 1/3 of a second to execute. Has tht TCPConnect service been> >timed?>> It's not optimized for speed (although it's much faster than DOS). What's> fastest is if you carry on a conversation with a bunch of> [TCPSend]s inside> a single [TCPConnect]. But bringing up and tearing down a TCP connection> is inherently slow on any OS.>> Right now it's sort of at the beginning stages where it's just a> 'yeah, you> can do that' feature.>
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Thanks Grant,I'll optimize my application to minimize the connections using textvariables and some local caching. On the first couple of connections, it'sstill fast!Aloha, Olin> -----Original Message-----> From: Grant Hulbert [mailto:granth@smithmicro.com]> Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 1998 12:57 PM> To: WebDNA-Talk@smithmicro.com> Subject: Re: speed of TCPConnect?>>> >Building a system where I want to connect some webcat pages to a Java> >Application Server which ties into an Oracle database.> TCPConnect works like> >a charm ;) However, what happens when I start embedding about a dozen> >TCPConnect calls? I remember a thread once saying that the
[DOS] context> >took about 1/3 of a second to execute. Has tht TCPConnect service been> >timed?>> It's not optimized for speed (although it's much faster than DOS). What's> fastest is if you carry on a conversation with a bunch of>
[tcpsend]s inside> a single
[tcpconnect]. But bringing up and tearing down a TCP connection> is inherently slow on any OS.>> Right now it's sort of at the beginning stages where it's just a> 'yeah, you> can do that' feature.>
Olin Lagon
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
mail test (1997)
WebCat Hosting (1998)
WebMerchant Process Orders errors (2000)
[WebDNA] Poll: Cloud hosting (2016)
Credit Card Checksum (1997)
New Command prefs ... (1997)
Passing WebCat Vars with Javascript (2000)
WebCat2b13 Command Reference Doc error (1997)
Great product and great job ! (1997)
Rendering out a page (1997)
[WebDNA] naming math vars in v.7 (2010)
RE: protect tag not working (1998)
ANNC: MerchantMaker releases SuperCatalog v2.1 (2000)
webCatalog and Stocks (1998)
A two part question (1999)
[showif] problem (1999)
New Guestbook Source (1997)
Sorry I didn't pay attention-but ??? (1997)
Problem with empty form-variables in [search] (1998)
Shipping charges depending on tax rate? (1997)