RE: speed of TCPConnect?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1998


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 21435
interpreted = N
texte = Thanks Grant,I'll optimize my application to minimize the connections using text variables and some local caching. On the first couple of connections, it's still fast!Aloha, Olin> -----Original Message----- > From: Grant Hulbert [mailto:granth@smithmicro.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 1998 12:57 PM > To: WebDNA-Talk@smithmicro.com > Subject: Re: speed of TCPConnect? > > > >Building a system where I want to connect some webcat pages to a Java > >Application Server which ties into an Oracle database. > TCPConnect works like > >a charm ;) However, what happens when I start embedding about a dozen > >TCPConnect calls? I remember a thread once saying that the [dos] context > >took about 1/3 of a second to execute. Has tht TCPConnect service been > >timed? > > It's not optimized for speed (although it's much faster than DOS). What's > fastest is if you carry on a conversation with a bunch of > [TCPSend]s inside > a single [TCPConnect]. But bringing up and tearing down a TCP connection > is inherently slow on any OS. > > Right now it's sort of at the beginning stages where it's just a > 'yeah, you > can do that' feature. > Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. RE: speed of TCPConnect? (Olin Lagon 1998)
  2. Re: speed of TCPConnect? (Grant Hulbert 1998)
Thanks Grant,I'll optimize my application to minimize the connections using text variables and some local caching. On the first couple of connections, it's still fast!Aloha, Olin> -----Original Message----- > From: Grant Hulbert [mailto:granth@smithmicro.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 1998 12:57 PM > To: WebDNA-Talk@smithmicro.com > Subject: Re: speed of TCPConnect? > > > >Building a system where I want to connect some webcat pages to a Java > >Application Server which ties into an Oracle database. > TCPConnect works like > >a charm ;) However, what happens when I start embedding about a dozen > >TCPConnect calls? I remember a thread once saying that the [DOS] context > >took about 1/3 of a second to execute. Has tht TCPConnect service been > >timed? > > It's not optimized for speed (although it's much faster than DOS). What's > fastest is if you carry on a conversation with a bunch of > [tcpsend]s inside > a single [tcpconnect]. But bringing up and tearing down a TCP connection > is inherently slow on any OS. > > Right now it's sort of at the beginning stages where it's just a > 'yeah, you > can do that' feature. > Olin Lagon

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

mail test (1997) WebCat Hosting (1998) WebMerchant Process Orders errors (2000) [WebDNA] Poll: Cloud hosting (2016) Credit Card Checksum (1997) New Command prefs ... (1997) Passing WebCat Vars with Javascript (2000) WebCat2b13 Command Reference Doc error (1997) Great product and great job ! (1997) Rendering out a page (1997) [WebDNA] naming math vars in v.7 (2010) RE: protect tag not working (1998) ANNC: MerchantMaker releases SuperCatalog v2.1 (2000) webCatalog and Stocks (1998) A two part question (1999) [showif] problem (1999) New Guestbook Source (1997) Sorry I didn't pay attention-but ??? (1997) Problem with empty form-variables in [search] (1998) Shipping charges depending on tax rate? (1997)