Re: WebCatalog vs. Cold Fusion

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1998


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 21694
interpreted = N
texte = It is much faster. I was impressed with the extremely fast response most of the pages got. Hands down the new NT server is tops at speed. The slowdown occurs on the NT server when one form spits out a page with a multiple frameset.Since this only happens in one part of our application it will be easy to overcome (famous last words, right? ;). I was wondering there is any documentation on this or if anyone out there has any ideas and suggestions to improve the speed of the frameset layout. The server appears to be searching/processing for quite awhile, then it slowly displays the results.weird.-- Jocelyn Plazewska Webmaster, Jintek, LLC webmaster@jintek.com-----Original Message----- From: PCS Technical Support To: WebDNA-Talk@smithmicro.com Date: Wednesday, December 09, 1998 3:26 AM Subject: Re: WebCatalog vs. Cold Fusion >>I do have another question though, I am migrating a web-based application >>from a >>Macintosh web server to a Windows NT server. While doing benchmarks I have >>noticed that although the NT server is considerably more powerful than our >>faithful (but old) Mac, the performance when processing the same web pages >>with >>WebDNA is dramatically slower on the NT Server. Since this only happens with >>really complex pages that load several frames I am looking for a coding >>alternative. Does anyone have any suggestions to help speed it up? Any >>constructive comments are welcome =) > >This surprises me. Are you running IIS or WebSite? IIS should be quite >fast running WebCatalog, esp. compared to MacOS. > >Technical Support | ==== eCommerce and Beyond ==== >Pacific Coast Software | WebCatalog, WebMerchant, >11770 Bernardo Plaza Court | SiteEdit Pro, PhotoMaster, >San Diego, CA 92128 | Typhoon >619/675-1106 Fax: 619/675-0372 | http://www.smithmicro.com/ > > > Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: WebCatalog vs. Cold Fusion (Gary Richter 1998)
  2. Re: WebCatalog vs. Cold Fusion (Dave MacLeay 1998)
  3. Re: WebCatalog vs. Cold Fusion (PCS Technical Support 1998)
  4. Re: WebCatalog vs. Cold Fusion (Tim Taylor 1998)
  5. Re: WebCatalog vs. Cold Fusion (Gary Richter 1998)
  6. Re: WebCatalog vs. Cold Fusion (Jocelyn Plazewska 1998)
  7. Re: WebCatalog vs. Cold Fusion (PCS Technical Support 1998)
  8. Re: WebCatalog vs. Cold Fusion (PCS Technical Support 1998)
  9. Re: WebCatalog vs. Cold Fusion (Jocelyn Plazewska 1998)
  10. Re: WebCatalog vs. Cold Fusion (Bob Minor 1998)
  11. Re: WebCatalog vs. Cold Fusion (John Hill 1998)
  12. Re: WebCatalog vs. Cold Fusion (Jim V 1998)
  13. Re: WebCatalog vs. Cold Fusion (Mícheál O Sé 1998)
  14. Re: WebCatalog vs. Cold Fusion (Dave MacLeay 1998)
  15. Re: WebCatalog vs. Cold Fusion (Jocelyn Plazewska 1998)
  16. WebCatalog vs. Cold Fusion (Luke Melia 1998)
It is much faster. I was impressed with the extremely fast response most of the pages got. Hands down the new NT server is tops at speed. The slowdown occurs on the NT server when one form spits out a page with a multiple frameset.Since this only happens in one part of our application it will be easy to overcome (famous last words, right? ;). I was wondering there is any documentation on this or if anyone out there has any ideas and suggestions to improve the speed of the frameset layout. The server appears to be searching/processing for quite awhile, then it slowly displays the results.weird.-- Jocelyn Plazewska Webmaster, Jintek, LLC webmaster@jintek.com-----Original Message----- From: PCS Technical Support To: WebDNA-Talk@smithmicro.com Date: Wednesday, December 09, 1998 3:26 AM Subject: Re: WebCatalog vs. Cold Fusion >>I do have another question though, I am migrating a web-based application >>from a >>Macintosh web server to a Windows NT server. While doing benchmarks I have >>noticed that although the NT server is considerably more powerful than our >>faithful (but old) Mac, the performance when processing the same web pages >>with >>WebDNA is dramatically slower on the NT Server. Since this only happens with >>really complex pages that load several frames I am looking for a coding >>alternative. Does anyone have any suggestions to help speed it up? Any >>constructive comments are welcome =) > >This surprises me. Are you running IIS or WebSite? IIS should be quite >fast running WebCatalog, esp. compared to MacOS. > >Technical Support | ==== eCommerce and Beyond ==== >Pacific Coast Software | WebCatalog, WebMerchant, >11770 Bernardo Plaza Court | SiteEdit Pro, PhotoMaster, >San Diego, CA 92128 | Typhoon >619/675-1106 Fax: 619/675-0372 | http://www.smithmicro.com/ > > > Jocelyn Plazewska

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Date sorting (1997) Shopping carts and reloading pages (1997) I forgot (1998) Re[3]: 2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996) Summing fields (1997) W* 4.2 / WebCat (TPro) 3.0.5b / OS 8.5.1 / BW G3 (2000) File Security (1999) DomainList (2005) [WebDNA] Anyone using CODA ?? (2012) WC2.0 Memory Requirements (1997) Friendly , quick 'security' check, please (2003) Help name our technology! (1997) Search/sort in URL Was: GuestBook example (1997) WebCatalog for Postcards ? (1997) WebCat2b12 CGI Mac - [shownext] problem (1997) View order not right (1997) &fieldsdir=ra truely random?? (2000) WYSIWYG HTML editor for use in browser (2001) Help name our technology! I found it (1997) Summing fields (1997)