Re: [OT] What log analyzer do you use?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 29168
interpreted = N
texte = We use WebTrends and are very pleased with it, you can also set it up so that you can go to a Web page, select the information you want, and it will do an up to the minute analysis of current data in real-time, very nice feature!John W. Smith Vice President of Design and Engineering AdMar Productions, Inc.----- Original Message ----- From: Nicolas Verhaeghe To: WebCatalog Talk Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 1138 Subject: [OT] What log analyzer do you use? > I am looking for a good and proven solution for analyzing web hits and > visits (with regional and domain analysis and all that stuff). > > I intend to save the logs as W3C Extended format. > > What do you use and are you happy with it? > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [OT] What log analyzer do you use? (Mike Davis 2000)
  2. Re: [OT] What log analyzer do you use? (Serban Constantinescu 2000)
  3. Re: [OT] What log analyzer do you use? (John W. Smith 2000)
  4. Re: [OT] What log analyzer do you use? (John W. Smith 2000)
  5. Re: [OT] What log analyzer do you use? (Bill Heissenbuttel 2000)
  6. Re: [OT] What log analyzer do you use? (Charles Kline 2000)
  7. Re: [OT] What log analyzer do you use? (Jeff Logan 2000)
  8. Re: [OT] What log analyzer do you use? (Nicolas Verhaeghe 2000)
  9. Re: [OT] What log analyzer do you use? (Clint Davis 2000)
  10. [OT] What log analyzer do you use? (Nicolas Verhaeghe 2000)
We use WebTrends and are very pleased with it, you can also set it up so that you can go to a Web page, select the information you want, and it will do an up to the minute analysis of current data in real-time, very nice feature!John W. Smith Vice President of Design and Engineering AdMar Productions, Inc.----- Original Message ----- From: Nicolas Verhaeghe To: WebCatalog Talk Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 1138 Subject: [OT] What log analyzer do you use? > I am looking for a good and proven solution for analyzing web hits and > visits (with regional and domain analysis and all that stuff). > > I intend to save the logs as W3C Extended format. > > What do you use and are you happy with it? > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to John W. Smith

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Repost paging through results detail view (2003) Newbie problem blah blah blah (1997) Clean Code: Rules for inserting keyboard returns? (1997) Bit off subject -- Faxing orders (1997) FREE Stuff .. (2003) WebCatalog Startup and OSX with ODBC (2002) WC Bulletin Board Issue (2003) Search Engine bots (2002) log files (1998) system crashes, event log (1997) The code, one more time. (2003) convertchars and case? (1998) RE: WebCatalog2 for NT Beta Request (1997) WebCatalog stalls (1998) ooops...WebCatalog [FoundItems] Problem - LONG - (1997) [include ...] behavior (1997) Summ=T Problem (1997) ImageMagick (2005) Nested tags count question (1997) # fields limited? (1997)