Re: Hierarchy of form/text/math variables
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2000
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 31111
interpreted = N
texte = Yes, I believe the merits of the secure format are well apparent. And I believe a transition is wise, if not inevitable. But if a context change could be made that worked in the interim for those of us who would otherwise have to re-code tens or hundreds of sites, I think it would be of great help and service.Mike> > I like the default to be more secure, so I would prefer a context > that would allow you to specify a chunk of code that would allow the > insecure behavior. > > Then you could: > >>
>> . >> . >> whatever code you needed >> . >> . >> > > everything else would use the new secure method. For old code, you > could make the whole page insecure by placing the context around the > whole page. Includes would have to have separate insecure tags. > -Chuck- > > __________________________________________________________________________ > Chuck Rice
> ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Yes, I believe the merits of the secure format are well apparent. And I believe a transition is wise, if not inevitable. But if a context change could be made that worked in the interim for those of us who would otherwise have to re-code tens or hundreds of sites, I think it would be of great help and service.Mike> > I like the default to be more secure, so I would prefer a context > that would allow you to specify a chunk of code that would allow the > insecure behavior. > > Then you could: > >> >> . >> . >> whatever code you needed >> . >> . >> > > everything else would use the new secure method. For old code, you > could make the whole page insecure by placing the context around the > whole page. Includes would have to have separate insecure tags. > -Chuck- > > __________________________________________________________________________ > Chuck Rice > ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to
Mike Davis
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Repeating Fields (1997)
where did it find it? (2000)
Bug or syntax error on my part? (1997)
[shippingtotal] & Formulas.db prob (2003)
Running _every_ page through WebCat-error.html (1997)
Explorer 3.0/ Access Denied! (1997)
WebCatalog/WebMerchant bug? (1999)
WebCatalog 4.0 has been released! (2000)
AquaZone (2006)
[WebDNA] hide [DOS] command strings on resulting page (2016)
writefile to create static pages (2003)
Nav. 4 probs with cart (1997)
No comment (1997)
[sendmail] possible modification needed... (2000)
2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996)
OT - Spiders and Bots (2000)
[WebDNA] WebDNA 7 (2011)
Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (1997)
OT: Prevent Caching js Files (2003)
Banners (1997)