Re: Proposed FormVariables hierarchy
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2000
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 31697
interpreted = N
texte = > Default behavior would be to store text variables in the secure > namespace. Adding the optional secure=F parameter like [text > secure=f]fred=hello[/text] would put those values into the new > un-secure namespace.Will our older templates work? With the unsecure namespace (as you call it) coming first, we would not have to worry. With this new proposed hierarchy, we will still have to go back and modify our older templates, and in my case it's a no-go, because I have to go on (I cannot afford looking back to what I did before, only to correct my bugs).That is a very important question.Again: an upgrade where all we would have to do is install the new version in order to see our older template work is a necessity.The case of people who purchased an already made solution (stuff like The Pubb or Banner Sleuth -or whatever the name is) with encrypted templates will not be able to use them if those templates take advantage of the older hierarchy.[text/math secure=f] should therefore be a default [text/math secure=t] should therefore be an option(just like show=f is an option and show=t a default).My question makes sense. ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
> Default behavior would be to store text variables in the secure > namespace. Adding the optional secure=F parameter like [text > secure=f]fred=hello[/text] would put those values into the new > un-secure namespace.Will our older templates work? With the unsecure namespace (as you call it) coming first, we would not have to worry. With this new proposed hierarchy, we will still have to go back and modify our older templates, and in my case it's a no-go, because I have to go on (I cannot afford looking back to what I did before, only to correct my bugs).That is a very important question.Again: an upgrade where all we would have to do is install the new version in order to see our older template work is a necessity.The case of people who purchased an already made solution (stuff like The Pubb or Banner Sleuth -or whatever the name is) with encrypted templates will not be able to use them if those templates take advantage of the older hierarchy.[text/math secure=f] should therefore be a default [text/math secure=t] should therefore be an option(just like show=f is an option and show=t a default).My question makes sense. ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to
Nicolas Verhaeghe
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Authentication (1998)
Duplicates (1998)
Questions (1998)
Getting total number of items ordered (1997)
listfiles shows invisible files ... (1999)
A Couple Photos from the SmithMicro Booth at MacWorld (2000)
Boolean Tests with dereferenced arrays are broken in (2003)
Dubble Sku's in a Database (1999)
HTML Editors (1997)
Anyone have an invoicing system? (1999)
[WebDNA] Listwords and newline (2011)
Sendmail double space (2001)
Using Plug-In while running 1.6.1 (1997)
[WebDNA] Sorry WebDNA server not running - September 2019 Edition (2019)
wrong authentication (1998)
Erotic Sites (1997)
Convertchars Problem (2004)
New Site Announcement (1998)
headers (2004)
2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996)