Re: Too many webcat comments. [WAS- Large founditems loops]

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000

It keeps the original formatting. numero = 32525
interpreted = N
texte = >Ken did you find that over a threshold number of webcat comments >used in *any* way>caused the problem?I didn't check it that carefully.Whenever I discover a bug for SM, they almost always ignore my bug report. If they care so little about making their software work properly (or better) that they cannot be bothered to reply to my messages, or to investigate further, then why should I?>Or did the problem only tend to occur when using the comments to>hide carriage returns?That's all I was using the comments for in my test.>And if it was the latter, then did the problem occur only when>hiding carriage returns occuring inside another webcat tag/context, >or even when just>hiding carriage returns that seperate lines of simple HTML?My test used comment tags exclusively to hide CR's.================================Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant808-737-6499 http://webdna.net================================-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

Re: Too many webcat comments. [WAS- Large founditems loops] (Dale LaFountain 2000)
Re: Too many webcat comments. [WAS- Large founditems loops] (dale@gmr.dresdner.net 2000)
Re: Too many webcat comments. [WAS- Large founditems loops] (John Butler 2000)
Re: Too many webcat comments. [WAS- Large founditems loops] (Derek C. 2000)
Re: Too many webcat comments. [WAS- Large founditems loops] (Charles Kline 2000)
Re: Too many webcat comments. [WAS- Large founditems loops] (Glenn Busbin 2000)
Re: Too many webcat comments. [WAS- Large founditems loops] (Kenneth Grome 2000)
Too many webcat comments. [WAS- Large founditems loops] (John Butler 2000)

>Ken did you find that over a threshold number of webcat comments >used in *any* way>caused the problem?I didn't check it that carefully.Whenever I discover a bug for SM, they almost always ignore my bug report. If they care so little about making their software work properly (or better) that they cannot be bothered to reply to my messages, or to investigate further, then why should I?>Or did the problem only tend to occur when using the comments to>hide carriage returns?That's all I was using the comments for in my test.>And if it was the latter, then did the problem occur only when>hiding carriage returns occuring inside another webcat tag/context, >or even when just>hiding carriage returns that seperate lines of simple HTML?My test used comment tags exclusively to hide CR's.================================Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant808-737-6499 http://webdna.net================================-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Kenneth Grome

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Re: Too many webcat comments. [WAS- Large founditems loops]

2000

Top Articles:

Related Readings: