Re: 06/06/2000 bug warning ...
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2000
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 32967
interpreted = N
texte = >> I identified a significant bug in the version 4 beta on June 6, 2000 >> --the day before SM released it to the general public. I tried >> reporting this bug to SM directly via email, but they failed to >> respond to my email message as requested. The next day, they released >> version 4 to the public, bug and all. This bug causes syntactically >> correct webcat 2.x and 3.x templates to fail when certain contexts >> are nested. > >I cannot find any evidence that you reported any bug on June 6, either >on the Beta list or this one. Put up or shut up... My quote above *specifically* says I reported this issue to SM directly via email. Since I never reported this on either talk list, and in fact I never claimed to have reported this on the talk lists, it seems like it is your false assumption that is causing you to look for evidence where it clearly does not exist. ================================ Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant 808-737-6499 http://webdna.net ================================------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>> I identified a significant bug in the version 4 beta on June 6, 2000 >> --the day before SM released it to the general public. I tried >> reporting this bug to SM directly via email, but they failed to >> respond to my email message as requested. The next day, they released >> version 4 to the public, bug and all. This bug causes syntactically >> correct webcat 2.x and 3.x templates to fail when certain contexts >> are nested. > >I cannot find any evidence that you reported any bug on June 6, either >on the Beta list or this one. Put up or shut up... My quote above *specifically* says I reported this issue to SM directly via email. Since I never reported this on either talk list, and in fact I never claimed to have reported this on the talk lists, it seems like it is your false assumption that is causing you to look for evidence where it clearly does not exist. ================================ Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant 808-737-6499 http://webdna.net ================================------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Kenneth Grome
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
NTbeta18 corrupted? (1997)
More on the email templates (1997)
RequiredFields template (1997)
WebCat2b15MacPlugin - showing [math] (1997)
HELP WITH DATES (1997)
Calculating multiple shipping... (1997)
version 2 for NT (1997)
WebCat2b12plugin - [search] is broken ... not! (1997)
Need relative path explanation (1997)
AutoCommit Preference? (1998)
[WebDNA] Comparing 2 MySQL tables (2009)
Field validation problem (1999)
Database Security Rev., (2002)
OSX Continued (2000)
Error Lob.db records error message not name (1997)
Separate SSL Server (1997)
RE: Netscape v. IE (1997)
Problems with cybercash (2000)
[shownext max=?] armed (1997)
Help (1999)