Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 35522
interpreted = N
texte = I would then suspect that issueing this tag will first flush the database to disk, then lock it? Otherwise it's pointless I think... -- Sincerely, Bob Sneidar Systems Manager The Word For Today> From: Glenn Busbin > Reply-To: (WebCatalog Talk) > Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 09:39:10 > To: (WebCatalog Talk) > Subject: Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? > > I found this in the archives. It's from 1998, so it must apply to WC3. > >>> Is [ExclusiveLock] an officially supported tag now? >> It's not officially supported yet, but we believe it won't harm >> anything to use it either. We want to make it multidatabase-aware >> before we officially announce it and roll it into the product. ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? (ShrPAUL1@aol.com 2000)
  2. Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? (Emily Bonck 2000)
  3. Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? (ShrPAUL1@aol.com 2000)
  4. Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? (John Peacock 2000)
  5. Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? (ShrPAUL1@aol.com 2000)
  6. Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? (ShrPAUL1@aol.com 2000)
  7. Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? (ShrPAUL1@aol.com 2000)
  8. Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? (Bob Sneidar 2000)
  9. Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? (Glenn Busbin 2000)
  10. exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? (John Butler 2000)
I would then suspect that issueing this tag will first flush the database to disk, then lock it? Otherwise it's pointless I think... -- Sincerely, Bob Sneidar Systems Manager The Word For Today> From: Glenn Busbin > Reply-To: (WebCatalog Talk) > Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 09:39:10 > To: (WebCatalog Talk) > Subject: Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? > > I found this in the archives. It's from 1998, so it must apply to WC3. > >>> Is [exclusivelock] an officially supported tag now? >> It's not officially supported yet, but we believe it won't harm >> anything to use it either. We want to make it multidatabase-aware >> before we officially announce it and roll it into the product. ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Bob Sneidar

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

WebCat2b15MacPlugin - showing [math] (1997) Changing price for a SLU based on options (size, etc.) (1997) Possible Macv2.1b2 Merge Bug (1997) Frames and WebCat (1997) searching illegal HTML (2002) WebCat for mass emailings (1997) Wow .. (2003) Will webdna execute before a [redirect]? (1999) NYC-based WebDNA programmers (2003) http upload (2001) WC1.6 to WC2 date formatting (1997) TCPConnect misbehavin' for me. (2000) Here is the code: (2000) [addlineitems] (1997) [WebDNA] Password Generator (2012) Multiple catalog databases and showcart (1997) 2.0 Info (1997) [TaxableTotal] - not working with AOL and IE (1997) Execute Applescript (1997) [ConvertChars] problem (1997)