Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question)

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 35729
interpreted = N
texte = Your Honor; on 8/3/00 9:24 PM, the Defendant, Peter Ostry, confessed:> on 04.08.2000 5:47, Aaron Lynch at a.list@ninewire.com wrote: > >> if there is a checkbox, then [mycheckbox] becomes 'T' right? >> so, [raw][mycheckbox][/raw] doesn't equal 'T' >> >> if there is no variable named [mycheckbox] then when webcat looks at that, >> it ends up with nothing and so just displays [mycheckbox] exactly. >> >> [raw][mycheckbox][/raw] essentially just makes the stuff inside [raw] >> display exactly as typed, so [mycheckbox]=[mycheckbox] >> >> Does that make sense? > > > Yes. > This behavior is not a matter of Webcat but of HTML. Not activated > checkboxes do not show up on following pages. Webcat gets no information > from the form and if you write the variable name, this variable is undefined > and therefore displayed as it is.Uhhhmmm Peter.... I wasn't asking, I was answering the original question :)-Aaron ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (John Butler 2000)
  2. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (Rob Marquardt 2000)
  3. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (Bob Sneidar 2000)
  4. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (Peter Ostry 2000)
  5. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (Bob Sneidar 2000)
  6. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (John Peacock 2000)
  7. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (Bob Sneidar 2000)
  8. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (Joseph D'Andrea 2000)
  9. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  10. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (Joseph D'Andrea 2000)
  11. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (Peter Ostry 2000)
  12. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (Will Starck 2000)
  13. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (WebDNA Support 2000)
  14. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (Bob Minor 2000)
  15. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (John Peacock 2000)
  16. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (Paul Fowler 2000)
  17. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (Rob Marquardt 2000)
  18. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (Bob Sneidar 2000)
  19. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  20. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (Peter Ostry 2000)
  21. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (Aaron Lynch 2000)
  22. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (Peter Ostry 2000)
  23. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (Britt T. 2000)
  24. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (John Butler 2000)
  25. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (Anup Setty 2000)
  26. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (Kim Ingram 2000)
  27. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (Will Starck 2000)
  28. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (Peter Ostry 2000)
  29. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (Aaron Lynch 2000)
  30. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (Peter Ostry 2000)
  31. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  32. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (Aaron Lynch 2000)
  33. Re: YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (Bob Sneidar 2000)
  34. YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (Will Starck 2000)
Your Honor; on 8/3/00 9:24 PM, the Defendant, Peter Ostry, confessed:> on 04.08.2000 5:47, Aaron Lynch at a.list@ninewire.com wrote: > >> if there is a checkbox, then [mycheckbox] becomes 'T' right? >> so, [raw][mycheckbox][/raw] doesn't equal 'T' >> >> if there is no variable named [mycheckbox] then when webcat looks at that, >> it ends up with nothing and so just displays [mycheckbox] exactly. >> >> [raw][mycheckbox][/raw] essentially just makes the stuff inside [raw] >> display exactly as typed, so [mycheckbox]=[mycheckbox] >> >> Does that make sense? > > > Yes. > This behavior is not a matter of Webcat but of HTML. Not activated > checkboxes do not show up on following pages. Webcat gets no information > from the form and if you write the variable name, this variable is undefined > and therefore displayed as it is.Uhhhmmm Peter.... I wasn't asking, I was answering the original question :)-Aaron ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Aaron Lynch

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Error (1997) please unsubscribe me! (2000) Proposed FormVariables hierarchy (2000) Serial Number Question (1997) Grouping fields help (2004) Re:Virtual hosting and webcatNT (1997) Running 2 two WebCatalog.acgi's (1996) New Shipping Options? (2001) redirect with frames (1997) Webcat 2.0.1 date math bug -> Crash! (1997) [WebDNA] macOS 10.13.3 and WebDNA Mac Server 8.5.1 - hick-up (2019) Possible Bug in 2.0b15.acgi (1997) Sorting error (1997) Need WebDNA that crashes server for testing (2000) NetSplat and WebCat2 (1997) NTbeta18 corrupted? (1997) Newbie question (1998) WebCatalog Use Question (1997) Search returns all, not 20 (1997) AOL and webcat (1998)