Re: encryption

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 49568
interpreted = N
texte = Just because you are using SSL does not mean your data is protected. SSL only helps to keep the data safe as people try to snoop into the information as it travels through the Internet. i.e. it keeps it safe from people using packet sniffing.If your server ever gets hacked you better have your data encrypted otherwise it will be very easy for said hacker to get credit card information.In 7 years of business my Windows servers have been hacked 5 times, Unix once and Linux once.Now that I'm on the topic of [encrypt] I'd like to hear how some of you guys come up with your seed value. Do you rather a standard value? or base it on some other bit of data from the same record? or from a seed file? What does everyone do?Matthew Perosi NJ-Singles.com ijo.comRon Ceballos wrote:>was told to ask whether [encrypted]'d data is necessary on a SSL server. >better to just use [encrypt], or just an SSL server? > >anyone? > > >------------------------------------------------------------- >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > > >------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Adding bcrypt as a encryption / hashing option (Donovan Brooke 2017)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Adding bcrypt as a encryption / hashing option (Tom Duke 2017)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Adding bcrypt as a encryption / hashing option (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2017)
  4. [WebDNA] Adding bcrypt as a encryption / hashing option (Tom Duke 2017)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] SHA1 Encryption For WebDNA 6.2 (Tom Duke 2014)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] SHA1 Encryption For WebDNA 6.2 (Stuart Tremain 2013)
  7. RE: [WebDNA] SHA1 Encryption For WebDNA 6.2 ("Terry Nair" 2013)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] SHA1 Encryption For WebDNA 6.2 (Stuart Tremain 2013)
  9. [WebDNA] SHA1 Encryption For WebDNA 6.2 ("Terry Nair" 2013)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] HMAC-SHA1 Encryption (Tom Duke 2013)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] HMAC-SHA1 Encryption (Donovan Brooke 2013)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] HMAC-SHA1 Encryption (Tom Duke 2013)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] HMAC-SHA1 Encryption (Stuart Tremain 2013)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] HMAC-SHA1 Encryption (Stuart Tremain 2013)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] HMAC-SHA1 Encryption (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2013)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] HMAC-SHA1 Encryption (Stuart Tremain 2013)
  17. Re: [WebDNA] HMAC-SHA1 Encryption (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2013)
  18. Re: [WebDNA] HMAC-SHA1 Encryption (Stuart Tremain 2013)
  19. [WebDNA] HMAC-SHA1 Encryption (Stuart Tremain 2013)
  20. Re: [WebDNA] ENCRYPTION problems (Stuart Tremain 2012)
  21. Re: [WebDNA] ENCRYPTION problems (Donovan Brooke 2012)
  22. Re: [WebDNA] ENCRYPTION problems (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  23. Re: [WebDNA] ENCRYPTION problems (Govinda 2012)
  24. [WebDNA] ENCRYPTION problems (Stuart Tremain 2012)
  25. Re: [WebDNA] MD5 encryption (Stuart Tremain 2011)
  26. Re: [WebDNA] MD5 encryption (Adam OConnor 2011)
  27. Re: [WebDNA] MD5 encryption ("Terry Wilson" 2011)
  28. Re: [WebDNA] MD5 encryption (Kenneth Grome 2011)
  29. Re: [WebDNA] MD5 encryption (Stuart Tremain 2011)
  30. Re: [WebDNA] MD5 encryption (Tom Duke 2011)
  31. Re: [WebDNA] MD5 encryption (Stuart Tremain 2011)
  32. Re: [WebDNA] MD5 encryption (Stuart Tremain 2011)
  33. Re: [WebDNA] MD5 encryption (Tom Duke 2011)
  34. Re: [WebDNA] MD5 encryption (Stuart Tremain 2011)
  35. Re: [WebDNA] MD5 encryption (Tom Duke 2011)
  36. [WebDNA] MD5 encryption (Stuart Tremain 2011)
  37. RE: [WebDNA] Intermittent Encryption Issue ("Tana Adams" 2009)
  38. Re: [WebDNA] Intermittent Encryption Issue (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  39. [WebDNA] Intermittent Encryption Issue ("Tana Adams" 2009)
  40. Re: Orderfile Encryption ( "Planet DJ (Chris W.)" 2007)
  41. Re: Orderfile Encryption ( Clint Davis 2007)
  42. Re: Orderfile Encryption ( John Peacock 2007)
  43. Re: Orderfile Encryption ( Clint Davis 2007)
  44. Re: Orderfile Encryption ( Clint Davis 2007)
  45. Re: Orderfile Encryption ( Donovan Brooke 2007)
  46. Re: Orderfile Encryption ( Donovan Brooke 2007)
  47. Re: Orderfile Encryption ( John Peacock 2007)
  48. Re: Orderfile Encryption ( Clint Davis 2007)
  49. Re: Orderfile Encryption ( Matthew A Perosi 2007)
  50. Re: Encryption Question ( John Peacock 2006)
  51. Re: Encryption Question ( Steve Craig 2006)
  52. Re: Encryption Question ( devaulw@onebox.com 2006)
  53. Re: Encryption Question ( Steve Craig 2006)
  54. Re: Encryption Question ( Steve Craig 2006)
  55. Re: Encryption Question ( John Peacock 2006)
  56. Encryption Question ( Steve Craig 2006)
  57. Encryption Webdna method versus Cybercash ( William DeVaul 2005)
  58. Encryption ( Stuart Tremain 2005)
  59. Re: encryption madness ( Thierry Almy 2004)
  60. Re: encryption madness ( "Scott Anderson" 2004)
  61. Re: encryption madness ( Thierry Almy 2004)
  62. Re: encryption madness ( Squaredancer@t-online.de (Squaredancer) 2004)
  63. encryption madness ( Thierry Almy 2004)
  64. Encryption Level (Glenn Busbin 2003)
  65. Re: encryption (Charles Kline 2003)
  66. Re: encryption (Matthew A Perosi 2003)
  67. Re: encryption (Dan Strong 2003)
  68. Re: encryption (Matthew A Perosi 2003)
  69. encryption (Ron Ceballos 2003)
  70. Re: encrypt method=APOP broken or just not enough docs? - was:MD5 encryption (Brian Fries 2003)
  71. Re: encrypt method=APOP broken or just not enough docs? - was:MD5 encryption (Dale LaFountain 2003)
  72. Re: encrypt method=APOP broken or just not enough docs? - wasMD5 encryption (Scott Anderson 2003)
  73. encrypt method=APOP broken or just not enough docs? - was MD5encryption (Dale LaFountain 2003)
  74. Re: MD5 Encryption (Matthew A Perosi 2003)
  75. MD5 Encryption (Michael Davis 2003)
  76. Re: OT: 128 bit Encryption (Kimberly D. Walls 2003)
  77. Re: OT: 128 bit Encryption (John Peacock 2003)
  78. Re: OT: 128 bit Encryption (Bob Minor 2003)
  79. Re: OT: 128 bit Encryption (charles kline 2003)
  80. OT: 128 bit Encryption (Kimberly D. Walls 2003)
  81. Re: encryption madness (John Hill 2003)
  82. Re: encryption madness (Kimberly D. Walls 2003)
  83. Re: encryption madness (Brian Fries 2003)
  84. Re: encryption madness (Kenneth Grome 2003)
  85. Re: encryption madness (John Hill 2003)
  86. Re: encryption madness (Kimberly D. Walls 2003)
  87. Re: encryption madness (Kenneth Grome 2003)
  88. Re: encryption madness (Kimberly D. Walls 2003)
  89. Re: encryption madness (Kimberly D. Walls 2003)
  90. Re: encryption madness (Kimberly D. Walls 2003)
  91. Re: encryption madness (Stuart Tremain 2003)
  92. Re: encryption madness (Brian Fries 2003)
  93. Re: encryption madness (Kenneth Grome 2003)
  94. Re: encryption madness (Stuart Tremain 2003)
  95. Re: encryption madness (Kenneth Grome 2003)
  96. Re: encryption madness (Donovan 2003)
  97. Re: encryption madness (Glenn Busbin 2003)
  98. Re: encryption madness (Andrew Simpson 2003)
  99. Re: encryption madness (Stuart Tremain 2003)
  100. Re: encryption madness (Tim Robinson 2003)
  101. Re: encryption madness (Andrew Simpson 2003)
  102. Re: encryption madness (Kimberly D. Walls 2003)
  103. Re: encryption madness (Glenn Busbin 2003)
  104. Re: encryption madness (Stuart Tremain 2003)
  105. Re: encryption madness (Rob Marquardt 2003)
  106. Re: encryption madness (Kimberly D. Walls 2003)
  107. Re: encryption madness (Kimberly D. Walls 2003)
  108. Re: encryption madness (Glenn Busbin 2003)
  109. Re: encryption madness (Bob Minor 2003)
  110. encryption madness (Kimberly D. Walls 2003)
  111. WebCat 3.0.7 Mac CGI & encryption (Serban Constantinescu 2001)
  112. Re: Encryption method used for [encrypt]? (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  113. Re: Encryption method used for [encrypt]? (Paul Fowler 2000)
  114. Encryption method used for [encrypt]? (Rob Marquardt 2000)
  115. Re: Encryption (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  116. Re: Encryption (Derrick Puckett 2000)
  117. Encryption (Nicolay Ramm 2000)
  118. Re[2]: Base64 encryption limitations? (jpeacock@univpress.com 1999)
  119. Re: Base64 encryption limitations? (Rob Marquardt 1999)
  120. Re[2]: Base64 encryption limitations? (jpeacock@univpress.com 1999)
  121. Re: Base64 encryption limitations? (Michael O Shea 1999)
  122. Re: Base64 encryption limitations? (jpeacock@univpress.com 1999)
  123. Base64 encryption limitations? (Rob Marquardt 1999)
  124. Re: no [include]s with encryption? (PCS Technical Support 1998)
  125. Re: no [include]s with encryption? (Kenneth Grome 1998)
  126. Re: no [include]s with encryption? (PCS Technical Support 1998)
  127. no [include]s with encryption? (Kenneth Grome 1998)
  128. Re: encryption seeds xing (John Hill 1998)
  129. encryption seeds xing (Bob Minor 1998)
  130. Re: Template Encryption (Bob Minor 1998)
  131. Re: Template Encryption (Jay Van Vark 1998)
  132. Re: Template Encryption (Bob Minor 1998)
  133. Re: Template Encryption (Bob Minor 1998)
  134. Re: Template Encryption (Jay Van Vark 1998)
  135. Re: Template Encryption (Bob Minor 1998)
  136. Re: Template Encryption (Jay Van Vark 1998)
  137. Re: Template Encryption (Bob Minor 1998)
  138. Re: Template Encryption (PCS Technical Support 1998)
  139. Template Encryption (bob 1998)
  140. Re: Template Encryption (Bob Minor 1998)
  141. Re: Email encryption (Scott Szretter 1998)
  142. Re: Email encryption (Kenneth Grome 1998)
  143. Re: Email encryption (Scott Szretter 1998)
  144. Re: Email encryption (Scott Szretter 1998)
  145. Re: Email encryption (Bob Minor 1998)
  146. Re: Email encryption (Kenneth Grome 1998)
  147. Re: Email encryption (Scott Szretter 1998)
  148. Re: Email encryption (Jim V 1998)
  149. Email encryption (Kenneth Grome 1998)
  150. Re: Email Formatting and Encryption (Dale LaFountain 1998)
  151. Re: Email Formatting and Encryption (RH Prouty 1998)
  152. Re: Email Formatting and Encryption (PCS Technical Support 1998)
  153. Re: Email Formatting and Encryption (Kenneth Grome 1998)
  154. Re: Email Formatting and Encryption (RH Prouty 1998)
  155. Re: Email Formatting and Encryption (Kenneth Grome 1998)
  156. Re: Email Formatting and Encryption (PCS Technical Support 1998)
  157. Re: Email Formatting and Encryption (Scott Szretter 1998)
  158. Re: Email Formatting and Encryption (Paul Willis 1998)
  159. Re: Email Formatting and Encryption (PCS Technical Support 1998)
  160. Re: encryption in browser? NOT (John Hill 1998)
  161. Re: encryption in browser? (John Hill 1998)
  162. Re: encryption in browser? (Peter Ostry 1998)
  163. Re: encryption in browser? (Peter Ostry 1998)
  164. Re: encryption in browser? (PCS Technical Support 1998)
  165. encryption in browser? (Peter Ostry 1998)
  166. Re: Encryption of E-mail (Grant Hulbert 1998)
  167. Encryption of E-mail (Glenn Davis 1998)
  168. Re: Encryption of E-mail (Nelson Chen 1998)
  169. Re:Emailer and encryption (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  170. Re:Emailer and encryption (Jay Van Vark 1997)
  171. Re:Emailer and encryption (Paul Keen 1997)
  172. Re:Emailer and encryption (Jay Van Vark 1997)
  173. Emailer and encryption (Paul Keen 1997)
  174. DB encryption ( Data)
Just because you are using SSL does not mean your data is protected. SSL only helps to keep the data safe as people try to snoop into the information as it travels through the Internet. i.e. it keeps it safe from people using packet sniffing.If your server ever gets hacked you better have your data encrypted otherwise it will be very easy for said hacker to get credit card information.In 7 years of business my Windows servers have been hacked 5 times, Unix once and Linux once.Now that I'm on the topic of [encrypt] I'd like to hear how some of you guys come up with your seed value. Do you rather a standard value? or base it on some other bit of data from the same record? or from a seed file? What does everyone do?Matthew Perosi NJ-Singles.com ijo.comRon Ceballos wrote:>was told to ask whether [encrypted]'d data is necessary on a SSL server. >better to just use [encrypt], or just an SSL server? > >anyone? > > >------------------------------------------------------------- >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > > >------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Matthew A Perosi

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

send mail problem? (1997) Separate SSL Server (1997) PCS Emailer's role ? (1997) WCf2 and nested tags (1997) OFF TOPIC: help wanted (1997) [OT] HTML render (2003) Problem with updating to 2.1.1 (1998) Encrypt question. (2000) Cart Numbers (1997) Emailer pref's won't save (2005) OT - royalty free images (2002) Uploading Files and Descriptions W* (2000) WebDNA Solutions ... sorry! (1997) WebCat2 several catalogs? (1997) New NT beta available (1997) Not reading code (1997) New syntax feedback for 4.0 (2000) FEA REQ: One .hdr, multiple .db's (2003) Re:quit command on NT (1997) WebCatalog2 Feature Feedback (1996)