Re: unique ascending numbers
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2003
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 50219
interpreted = N
texte = I should know this, but I'm curious, what happens to concurrent users whenthey attempt to append to a database that has an [exclusivelock] on it?Will their appends be made after the [/exclusivelock] is encountered or dothey get database is busy error message? What are the chances that theirappend info is lost because of any delays caused by the [exclusivelock]?GKOn 9.5.2003 23:16 Uhr, Joe D'Andrea
wrote:>> Do you have 5.x? If so then use &autonumber=field and you are done, noextra>> processing!>> You don't know that. You can say that it's easier to code for use> mere mortals, but do we know that the processing behind> &autonumber=field is less CPU intensive then a search to find the> maximum value in a field and then adding one to it?Joe,Scott explained it to me that with the autonumber it is more efficient.We have run into problem were only 5 people tried to add a new record. Thetemplate was giving each a new ID. Well, it happened that some of them gotthe same ID.So we have to wrap [exclusivelock] around the search to find the next highervalue and then do a append. I think &autonumber=ID is better:-)Sincerely,Nitai AventaggiatoCEO-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
I should know this, but I'm curious, what happens to concurrent users whenthey attempt to append to a database that has an [exclusivelock] on it?Will their appends be made after the [/exclusivelock] is encountered or dothey get database is busy error message? What are the chances that theirappend info is lost because of any delays caused by the [exclusivelock]?GKOn 9.5.2003 23:16 Uhr, Joe D'Andrea wrote:>> Do you have 5.x? If so then use &autonumber=field and you are done, noextra>> processing!>> You don't know that. You can say that it's easier to code for use> mere mortals, but do we know that the processing behind> &autonumber=field is less CPU intensive then a search to find the> maximum value in a field and then adding one to it?Joe,Scott explained it to me that with the autonumber it is more efficient.We have run into problem were only 5 people tried to add a new record. Thetemplate was giving each a new ID. Well, it happened that some of them gotthe same ID.So we have to wrap [exclusivelock] around the search to find the next highervalue and then do a append. I think &autonumber=ID is better:-)Sincerely,Nitai AventaggiatoCEO-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Gary Krockover
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Searching for (field1 OR field2) AND field3 (2000)
Can't ping (problem with [shell]) SOLVED (2006)
I've been thinking (2002)
Opinion: [input] should be called [output] ... (1997)
Verifying both name and password (was: New Problem) (1997)
Close Databases Crash? (1998)
Multiple radio buttons (1998)
linetiems in thankyou.tpl (1997)
[Fwd: Rotating Banners ... (was LinkExchange)] (1997)
Grant, please help me ... (1997)
Problem displaying search result (1997)
2nd Request for help/advice on variable pricing (2000)
Download Question (1997)
Time to opensource? was [SMSI] WebDNA is too good to (2006)
Interfacing WC with mail server (1998)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [include] doesn't allow creator (1997)
New WebDNA Solutions ... (1997)
[WebDNA] Database Column Update (2015)
WebCat2 - [SendNews] (1997)
Navigator 4.01 (1997)