Re: Date question

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 53294
interpreted = N
texte = On 10/7/03 3:35 PM, "andy mowrey" wrote: How about it SMSI... Are you telling us that date calculation from 0000 doesn't account for the Gregorian Reformation?!?! I wonder just how many pages I am going to have to recode now to get my 11 days out! Sheesh. > "The Gregorian Reformation is assumed to have occurred in 1752 on > the 3rd of September. By this time, most countries had recognized the > reformation (although a few did not recognize it until the early 1900's.) > Ten days following that date were eliminated by the reformation, so > the calendar for that month is a bit unusual." > > [dude:~] dude% cal 9 1752 > September 1752 > S M Tu W Th F S > 1 2 14 15 16 > 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 > 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Sorry.. I just couldn't help myself on that one ;-) Besides if it wasn't me I am sure Dan Strong would have fired off a zinger or two. ;-) Alex Alex J McCombie New World Media Chief Information Officer Box 124 888/892.6379 MartVille, NY 13111 Alex@NewWorldMedia.com http://OurClients.com Interface Designer WebDNA Programmer Database Designer ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Quick Date Question (Govinda 2008)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Quick Date Question (Govinda 2008)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Quick Date Question (Steve Craig 2008)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Quick Date Question (Gil Poulsen 2008)
  5. [WebDNA] Quick Date Question (Steve Craig 2008)
  6. Re: Silly date question ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  7. Re: Silly date question ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  8. Re: Silly date question ( Steve Craig 2006)
  9. Re: Silly date question ( Steve Craig 2006)
  10. Re: Silly date question ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  11. Re: Silly date question ( Gary Krockover 2006)
  12. Re: Silly date question ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  13. Silly date question ( Steve Craig 2006)
  14. Re: Date question ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  15. Re: Date question ( John Peacock 2003)
  16. Re: Date question ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  17. Re: Date question ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  18. Re: Date question ( Alex McCombie 2003)
  19. Re: Date question ( andy mowrey 2003)
  20. Re: Date question ( John Hill 2003)
  21. Date question ( andy mowrey 2003)
  22. Re: Date Question (Dan Strong 2002)
  23. Re: Date Question (Gary Krockover 2002)
  24. Re: Date Question (Dan Strong 2002)
  25. Re: Date Question (Kenneth Grome 2002)
  26. Re: Date Question (Jeff Logan 2002)
  27. Re: Date Question (Donovan 2002)
  28. Re: Date Question (Donovan 2002)
  29. Re: Date Question (Jeff Logan 2002)
  30. Re: Date Question (Chris List Recipient 2002)
  31. Re: Date Question (Jeff Logan 2002)
  32. Re: Date Question (Dan Strong 2002)
  33. Re: Date Question (Jeff Logan 2002)
  34. Re: Date Question (Gary Krockover 2002)
  35. Re: Date Question (Jeff Logan 2002)
  36. Re: Date Question (John Peacock 2002)
  37. Re: Date Question (Dan Strong 2002)
  38. Re: Date Question (Jeff Logan 2002)
  39. Re: Date Question (Dan Strong 2002)
On 10/7/03 3:35 PM, "andy mowrey" wrote: How about it SMSI... Are you telling us that date calculation from 0000 doesn't account for the Gregorian Reformation?!?! I wonder just how many pages I am going to have to recode now to get my 11 days out! Sheesh. > "The Gregorian Reformation is assumed to have occurred in 1752 on > the 3rd of September. By this time, most countries had recognized the > reformation (although a few did not recognize it until the early 1900's.) > Ten days following that date were eliminated by the reformation, so > the calendar for that month is a bit unusual." > > [dude:~] dude% cal 9 1752 > September 1752 > S M Tu W Th F S > 1 2 14 15 16 > 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 > 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Sorry.. I just couldn't help myself on that one ;-) Besides if it wasn't me I am sure Dan Strong would have fired off a zinger or two. ;-) Alex Alex J McCombie New World Media Chief Information Officer Box 124 888/892.6379 MartVille, NY 13111 Alex@NewWorldMedia.com http://OurClients.com Interface Designer WebDNA Programmer Database Designer ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Alex McCombie

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Fwd: checkboxes (2000) [WebDNA] sendmail attached file (2011) LOOP and IF statements (1997) search form problem.. (1997) Version clarification, please ... (1998) Displaying raw values (long) (1998) can WC render sites out? (1997) WebCat NT v. Mac (1997) Any WebCatters going to CeBit in Hanover, Germany? (2000) NetForms for email (1998) searchable list archive (1997) USPS change to SSL tcpconnect (2007) [WebDNA] [input] v. [sendmail] question (2009) problem with NT beta (1997) emailer (1997) Secure server question (1997) New iMac, now ... how do I make webdna serve .html files? (2005) Multiple download orders of the same product? (1997) RE: is sku a REQUIRED field on NT (1997) frames & carts (1997)