Re: Date question
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2003
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 53294
interpreted = N
texte = On 10/7/03 3:35 PM, "andy mowrey"
wrote: How about it SMSI... Are you telling us that date calculation from 0000doesn't account for the Gregorian Reformation?!?! I wonder just how many pages I am going to have to recode now to get my11 days out!Sheesh.> "The Gregorian Reformation is assumed to have occurred in 1752 on> the 3rd of September. By this time, most countries had recognized the> reformation (although a few did not recognize it until the early 1900's.)> Ten days following that date were eliminated by the reformation, so> the calendar for that month is a bit unusual."> > [dude:~] dude% cal 9 1752> September 1752> S M Tu W Th F S> 1 2 14 15 16> 17 18 19 20 21 22 23> 24 25 26 27 28 29 30Sorry.. I just couldn't help myself on that one ;-) Besides if it wasn't meI am sure Dan Strong would have fired off a zinger or two.;-)AlexAlex J McCombie New World MediaChief Information Officer Box 124888/892.6379 MartVille, NY 13111Alex@NewWorldMedia.com http://OurClients.comInterface Designer WebDNA Programmer Database Designer-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
On 10/7/03 3:35 PM, "andy mowrey" wrote: How about it SMSI... Are you telling us that date calculation from 0000doesn't account for the Gregorian Reformation?!?! I wonder just how many pages I am going to have to recode now to get my11 days out!Sheesh.> "The Gregorian Reformation is assumed to have occurred in 1752 on> the 3rd of September. By this time, most countries had recognized the> reformation (although a few did not recognize it until the early 1900's.)> Ten days following that date were eliminated by the reformation, so> the calendar for that month is a bit unusual."> > [dude:~] dude% cal 9 1752> September 1752> S M Tu W Th F S> 1 2 14 15 16> 17 18 19 20 21 22 23> 24 25 26 27 28 29 30Sorry.. I just couldn't help myself on that one ;-) Besides if it wasn't meI am sure Dan Strong would have fired off a zinger or two.;-)AlexAlex J McCombie New World MediaChief Information Officer Box 124888/892.6379 MartVille, NY 13111Alex@NewWorldMedia.com http://OurClients.comInterface Designer WebDNA Programmer Database Designer-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Alex McCombie
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Fwd: checkboxes (2000)
[WebDNA] sendmail attached file (2011)
LOOP and IF statements (1997)
search form problem.. (1997)
Version clarification, please ... (1998)
Displaying raw values (long) (1998)
can WC render sites out? (1997)
WebCat NT v. Mac (1997)
Any WebCatters going to CeBit in Hanover, Germany? (2000)
NetForms for email (1998)
searchable list archive (1997)
USPS change to SSL tcpconnect (2007)
[WebDNA] [input] v. [sendmail] question (2009)
problem with NT beta (1997)
emailer (1997)
Secure server question (1997)
New iMac, now ... how do I make webdna serve .html files? (2005)
Multiple download orders of the same product? (1997)
RE: is sku a REQUIRED field on NT (1997)
frames & carts (1997)