Re: [lookup] speed sales pitch
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2003
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 53516
interpreted = N
texte = Brian Fries wrote: > There is a sliding point somewhere out there where switching to an SQL > db becomes faster than using a WebDNA .db file, depending on the number > of records, the size of the records, the complexity of the searches, > etc. WebDNA definitely bogs down when the dbs get huge, even if you are > loaded with RAM and fast processors, because WebDNA doesn't utilize > pre-build indexes and hashing algorithms for direct access to records - I don't believe that is true. It was always my understanding that WebCatalog did perform some indexing, but not in a way that the developer had any control over. It is far too fast to be doing exclusively fulltext searches all the time. That said, you are correct that SQL tables with intelligent indexing will surpass WebCat at some point, dependent on lots of not-easily-quantifiable parameters. John -- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4501 Forbes Boulevard Suite H Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5748 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Brian Fries wrote: > There is a sliding point somewhere out there where switching to an SQL > db becomes faster than using a WebDNA .db file, depending on the number > of records, the size of the records, the complexity of the searches, > etc. WebDNA definitely bogs down when the dbs get huge, even if you are > loaded with RAM and fast processors, because WebDNA doesn't utilize > pre-build indexes and hashing algorithms for direct access to records - I don't believe that is true. It was always my understanding that WebCatalog did perform some indexing, but not in a way that the developer had any control over. It is far too fast to be doing exclusively fulltext searches all the time. That said, you are correct that SQL tables with intelligent indexing will surpass WebCat at some point, dependent on lots of not-easily-quantifiable parameters. John -- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4501 Forbes Boulevard Suite H Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5748 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
John Peacock
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Will webdna execute before a [redirect]? (1999)
Moment of Thanks (1997)
Preliminary Vendor Solicitation (2004)
WebCat2: Found Items syntax, etc. (1997)
Problems with [Applescript] (1997)
Cache Access Error (2000)
Re1000002: Setting up shop (1997)
Great product and great job ! (1997)
attachment (2000)
$Quit, $CloseDatabase corrections (1997)
Test (2002)
Protect (1997)
setting cookies with [setcookie] (1998)
WebCat2b14MacPlugIn - [include] doesn't hide the search string (1997)
emailer (1997)
[WebDNA] mod_WebDNA_apache2.2.so: mach-0, but wrong architecture (2010)
WebCat2: multiple currency support (1997)
Users.db [encrypt seed=????] (1998)
WebCat2 - [format thousands] (1997)
[OT] Mistakerosoft (2003)