Re: WebDNA vs PHP

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 54795
interpreted = N
texte = yup. but when youre dealing with lots of html code, that use " 's. its better to escape from php. because for every ", you have to escape it using a \". eg: echo ""; or ?> To: "WebDNA Talk" Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 10:01 AM Subject: Re: WebDNA vs PHP > Yes but it's either: > <---- 29 characters > or > hello <--- 34 characters > > ... and to keep this a little on the WebDNA topic here I'll compare. In > WebDNA I would use something like: > > [showif x=True] hello [name][/showif] <--- 34 characters > > hahahahha .... : c) > > On Tuesday, December 9, 2003, at 02:49 PM, Rajeev Kumar wrote: > > > You dont have to echo() or print(). you can just escape from the php > > portion > > of the code using ?> and > > > eg: > > .... > > ... > > if ($variable) { ?> > >

html code here

> > > ... > > ... > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Marc Kaiwi" > > To: "WebDNA Talk" > > Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 6:33 AM > > Subject: WebDNA vs PHP > > > > > >> Well I've been working with php/mysql for (only) about a week now ... > >> very cool! I'm excited about it. I'm converting a website I wrote > >> some > >> years ago in perl/DBM to php/mysql, the server hosting it doesn't > >> support WebDNA so that option is out unfortunately. > >> > >> Here's the one big advantage (IMHO) that WebDNA has over PHP : WebDNA > >> integrates better with html in that it allows you to use straight html > >> inside contexts without wrapping them in a print() or echo() > >> statements, this can be a real time saver. Other than that, php seems > >> to be just as quick to code and develop, it seems to be just a fast > >> and > >> full featured. PHP's big advantage may be that it's powerful, free and > >> integrates with MySQL so well. > >> > >> Just a few thoughts as I make my way through the dark. Looking for the > >> light switch which has got to be here somewhere, I know it. > >> > >> Signed: Marc Kaiwi > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------- > >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > >> the mailing list . > >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > >> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > > >> Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > > the mailing list . > > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > > > > > Signed: Marc Kaiwi > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: WebDNA vs PHP ( Alan White 2003)
  2. Re: WebDNA vs PHP ( Kenneth Grome 2003)
  3. Re: WebDNA vs PHP ( "Andrew Simpson" 2003)
  4. Re: WebDNA vs PHP ( "Rajeev Kumar" 2003)
  5. Re: WebDNA vs PHP ( Marc Kaiwi 2003)
  6. Re: WebDNA vs PHP ( "Rajeev Kumar" 2003)
  7. Re: WebDNA vs PHP ( "Andrew Simpson" 2003)
  8. Re: WebDNA vs PHP ( "Andrew Simpson" 2003)
  9. Re: WebDNA vs PHP ( Marc Kaiwi 2003)
  10. Re: WebDNA vs PHP ( "Rajeev Kumar" 2003)
  11. Re: WebDNA vs PHP ( Stuart Tremain 2003)
  12. Re: WebDNA vs PHP ( Marc Kaiwi 2003)
  13. Re: WebDNA vs PHP ( "Rajeev Kumar" 2003)
  14. Re: WebDNA vs PHP ( "Rajeev Kumar" 2003)
  15. Re: WebDNA vs PHP ( Marc Kaiwi 2003)
  16. Re: WebDNA vs PHP ( "Rajeev Kumar" 2003)
  17. WebDNA vs PHP ( Marc Kaiwi 2003)
yup. but when youre dealing with lots of html code, that use " 's. its better to escape from php. because for every ", you have to escape it using a \". eg: echo ""; or ?> To: "WebDNA Talk" Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 10:01 AM Subject: Re: WebDNA vs PHP > Yes but it's either: > <---- 29 characters > or > hello <--- 34 characters > > ... and to keep this a little on the WebDNA topic here I'll compare. In > WebDNA I would use something like: > > [showif x=True] hello [name][/showif] <--- 34 characters > > hahahahha .... : c) > > On Tuesday, December 9, 2003, at 02:49 PM, Rajeev Kumar wrote: > > > You dont have to echo() or print(). you can just escape from the php > > portion > > of the code using ?> and > > > eg: > > .... > > ... > > if ($variable) { ?> > >

html code here

> > > ... > > ... > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Marc Kaiwi" > > To: "WebDNA Talk" > > Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 6:33 AM > > Subject: WebDNA vs PHP > > > > > >> Well I've been working with php/mysql for (only) about a week now ... > >> very cool! I'm excited about it. I'm converting a website I wrote > >> some > >> years ago in perl/DBM to php/mysql, the server hosting it doesn't > >> support WebDNA so that option is out unfortunately. > >> > >> Here's the one big advantage (IMHO) that WebDNA has over PHP : WebDNA > >> integrates better with html in that it allows you to use straight html > >> inside contexts without wrapping them in a print() or echo() > >> statements, this can be a real time saver. Other than that, php seems > >> to be just as quick to code and develop, it seems to be just a fast > >> and > >> full featured. PHP's big advantage may be that it's powerful, free and > >> integrates with MySQL so well. > >> > >> Just a few thoughts as I make my way through the dark. Looking for the > >> light switch which has got to be here somewhere, I know it. > >> > >> Signed: Marc Kaiwi > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------- > >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > >> the mailing list . > >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > >> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > > >> Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > > the mailing list . > > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > > > > > Signed: Marc Kaiwi > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ "Rajeev Kumar"

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

tpl pages in dreamweaver (2000) Showif, Hideif reverse logic ? (1997) Web Catalog 2 demo (1997) Heads up: WebCatalog 4 drops MacTCP, 68K (2000) Re:no [search] with NT (1997) WCS Newbie question (1997) [WebDNA] =?windows-1252?Q?Re=3A_=5BWebDNA=5D_Re=3A_=5BWebDNA=5D_WebDNA=3A?= (2012) using showpage and showcart commands (1996) presetting a [math] var not working (2000) Assigning Serialized Customer Numbers (1997) Help with (2003) Wonderin' whats the way (1998) [OT] HTML EMAIL program wanted (1999) Multiple prices (1997) WebDNA Developer Resource Center (2002) E-mailer error codes (1997) ooops...WebCatalog [FoundItems] Problem - LONG - (1997) PCS Frames (1997) Re:ListFields and [name] (1997) syntax question, not in online refernce (1997)