Re: [Lookup] improvment [feature request]
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2004
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 58707
interpreted = N
texte = You could implement this yourself as a [function]...[function name=mylookup][return][lookup db=[tb]&value=[url][vl][/url]&lookinfield=[lif]&returnfield=[rf][showif [url][params_string][/url]^[url]&nf=[/url]]¬found=[url][nf][/url][/ showif]][/return][/function][mylookup db=brands.db&VL=[mylookup db=products.db&VL=[param6]&LIF=PRODUCT_ID&RF=BRAND]&LIF=ID&RF=urlValue](not tested, but should be close)- brianOn Jun 29, 2004, at 3:02 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote:> Hello,> I just wanted to ask this once more as right now I'm dealling with> a lot of nested lookups...>> This:> [lookup db=brands.db&value=[lookup > db=products.db&value=[param6]&lookinfield=PRODUCT_ID&returnfield=BRAND] > &lookinfield=ID&returnfield=urlValue]>> Would be more manageable in a syntax such as:>> [lookup db=brands.db&VL=[lookup > db=products.db&VL=[param6]&LIF=PRODUCT_ID&RF=BRAND]&LIF=ID&RF=urlValue]>>> I sure get tired of the long syntax... It would be nice to> have the abreviated version as an option.>> Anyone second the motion?>> Donovan-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
.To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
You could implement this yourself as a [function]...[function name=mylookup][return][lookup db=[tb]&value=[url][vl][/url]&lookinfield=[lif]&returnfield=[rf][showif [url][params_string][/url]^[url]&nf=[/url]]¬found=[url][nf][/url][/ showif]][/return][/function][mylookup db=brands.db&VL=[mylookup db=products.db&VL=[param6]&LIF=PRODUCT_ID&RF=BRAND]&LIF=ID&RF=urlValue](not tested, but should be close)- brianOn Jun 29, 2004, at 3:02 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote:> Hello,> I just wanted to ask this once more as right now I'm dealling with> a lot of nested lookups...>> This:> [lookup db=brands.db&value=[lookup > db=products.db&value=[param6]&lookinfield=PRODUCT_ID&returnfield=BRAND] > &lookinfield=ID&returnfield=urlValue]>> Would be more manageable in a syntax such as:>> [lookup db=brands.db&VL=[lookup > db=products.db&VL=[param6]&LIF=PRODUCT_ID&RF=BRAND]&LIF=ID&RF=urlValue]>>> I sure get tired of the long syntax... It would be nice to> have the abreviated version as an option.>> Anyone second the motion?>> Donovan-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Brian Fries
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
RE: Can a database get stomped by simultaneous access? (1997)
Requiring that certain fields be completed (1997)
Smith Micro - no competition (2000)
Bug Report, maybe (1997)
[WebDNA] Processor Maxing out (2010)
Authenticate (1997)
Three new problems ... (1997)
Fed Ex Rate Charts (2003)
OT: RAID Options (2004)
Searching for all records (1998)
About WebDNA (2006)
Re:quit command on NT (1997)
Grant, please help me ... (1997)
WebCatalog Mac 2.1b3 (1997)
Email Scavengers (2003)
Mac 2.1b4 unknown error: BadSuffix (1997)
[WebDNA] Should I run the installer on an existing 8.x system on Ubuntu 14.04? (2015)
need to add a sku field to an existing db (2005)
Multiple Pulldowns (1997)
WCS Newbie question (1997)