Re: Webcat XML/XSLT Performance vs. static Html - Anyone from

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2006


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 66256
interpreted = N
texte = Thanks again for the feedback. XSLT is a web standard that other platforms are incorporating, such as php. It allows a dev to incorporate an xsl stylesheet with an xml source into one variable. So in this scenario, I would have: 1) An xml file as the source 2) An xsl file to instruct how to display the xml data 3) A webdna file to hold the code, which would be one line of script. details.tpl i.e. [xslt xslsource=detail.xsl&xmlsource=detail.xml][/xslt] Therefore, in my case I would have 30-50k xml files sitting on the server being displayed by one xsl template/stylesheet, via the details.tpl file. When a user selects an item, they would be directed to the details.tpl file which would grab the correct xml file as a data source. As I had said earlier, I really would like to do this, but before diving in I need to know how much more resource intense this would be vs. using static html pages. Roughly speaking, lets say that the server will have to do this function approx 150-200 times a minute. Kenneth Grome wrote: > Sorry Adam, I don't know because I never used webcat's [xslt] feature before. How does it work? What does it do? Probably one of those new-fangled features that my clients don't really need for their sites or they would have asked me about it my now ... :) > > Sincerely, > Kenneth Grome > owner@kengrome.com > kengrome@gmail.com > www.kengrome.com > > > > > > On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:26:31 -0500, Adam O'Connor wrote: > >> Ken - in your seasoned opinion, do you think using webcat's [xslt] >> feature will be resource intense? Wouldn't it be similar to an >> [include], resource-wise. We are leaning on writing html files, but >> I would rather use xml/xsl for the availability of data across other >> platforms and the ease of managing. >> >> Thanks for all comments thus far. Definitely heard by open ears. >> >> >> >> Kenneth Grome wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:06:59 -0600, Donovan Brooke wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Adam, you must have a lot of products, or a slow machine to have >>>> performance >>>> issues. And, if you do have a lot of products, doing static html pages for >>>> the details seems mind boggling. >>>> >>>> >>> I don't see why. I always write scripts that generate static pages >>> for the search engines. It doesn't matter how many static pages >>> there are if webdna is not serving them. Apache can serve millions >>> without blinking an eye ... :) >>> >>> Sincerely, Kenneth Grome owner@kengrome.com >>> kengrome@gmail.com >>> www.kengrome.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>> the mailing list . >>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >>> >>> Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ >>> >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >> >> Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ >> >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Webcat XML/XSLT Performance vs. static Html - Anyone from ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
  2. Re: Webcat XML/XSLT Performance vs. static Html - Anyone from ( Kenneth Grome 2006)
  3. Re: Webcat XML/XSLT Performance vs. static Html - Anyone from ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
Thanks again for the feedback. XSLT is a web standard that other platforms are incorporating, such as php. It allows a dev to incorporate an xsl stylesheet with an xml source into one variable. So in this scenario, I would have: 1) An xml file as the source 2) An xsl file to instruct how to display the xml data 3) A webdna file to hold the code, which would be one line of script. details.tpl i.e. [xslt xslsource=detail.xsl&xmlsource=detail.xml][/xslt] Therefore, in my case I would have 30-50k xml files sitting on the server being displayed by one xsl template/stylesheet, via the details.tpl file. When a user selects an item, they would be directed to the details.tpl file which would grab the correct xml file as a data source. As I had said earlier, I really would like to do this, but before diving in I need to know how much more resource intense this would be vs. using static html pages. Roughly speaking, lets say that the server will have to do this function approx 150-200 times a minute. Kenneth Grome wrote: > Sorry Adam, I don't know because I never used webcat's [xslt] feature before. How does it work? What does it do? Probably one of those new-fangled features that my clients don't really need for their sites or they would have asked me about it my now ... :) > > Sincerely, > Kenneth Grome > owner@kengrome.com > kengrome@gmail.com > www.kengrome.com > > > > > > On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:26:31 -0500, Adam O'Connor wrote: > >> Ken - in your seasoned opinion, do you think using webcat's [xslt] >> feature will be resource intense? Wouldn't it be similar to an >> [include], resource-wise. We are leaning on writing html files, but >> I would rather use xml/xsl for the availability of data across other >> platforms and the ease of managing. >> >> Thanks for all comments thus far. Definitely heard by open ears. >> >> >> >> Kenneth Grome wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:06:59 -0600, Donovan Brooke wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Adam, you must have a lot of products, or a slow machine to have >>>> performance >>>> issues. And, if you do have a lot of products, doing static html pages for >>>> the details seems mind boggling. >>>> >>>> >>> I don't see why. I always write scripts that generate static pages >>> for the search engines. It doesn't matter how many static pages >>> there are if webdna is not serving them. Apache can serve millions >>> without blinking an eye ... :) >>> >>> Sincerely, Kenneth Grome owner@kengrome.com >>> kengrome@gmail.com >>> www.kengrome.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>> the mailing list . >>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >>> >>> Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ >>> >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >> >> Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ >> >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Adam O'Connor

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

HELP WITH DATES (1997) OT - Useful Shipping Info (2002) WebDNA Solutions ... sorry! (1997) Summ=T Problem (1997) shipcost (1997) One Hour Email (2002) Setting up shop (1997) results in a table (2000) WebDNA vs PHP (2003) WC2f3 (1997) Another search question please... (1998) Summary layout (1997) Bug Report, maybe (1997) Multiple Hideif peramiters (2001) Adding headers to email (1997) [OT] Robust order processing (2003) #uck you (1998) Re[2]: Enhancement Request for WebCatalog-NT (1996) [delete] problem (1997) Next (1997)