Re: [WebDNA] Competitors!

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2008


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 100116
interpreted = N
texte = Kai Gradert wrote: > *Donovan,* > > Just curious, have you considered moving the WebDNA discussion/list to a > more public forum like Google Groups? That way it will be easier for new > curious folks to join the discussions. Plus you will get the benefits of > search engine crawling. > > – Kai – > > 323.304.5906 Cell > 415.869.3934 Fax Regarding the discussion format.. I would like to keep the data within WSC's control. We may want to re-do the ability to search content, and to integrate WebDNA related systems. However, I do want to get opinions... we have always used a list server such as this one. There has been a lot of misc. forums that have cropped up and left over the years, but a list server like this seems to stand the test of time. Another important point is that WebDNA has the ability to create forums. I think it would do a dis-service to the community to move our discussions to a non-WebDNA system. The Old archives is filled with great information.. however, sometime, a few years ago...formating was messed up pretty bad. Also, the looks of the system is Web Vers. 1.0! ;-) We may have this for reference on-line again, but I don't think we should proceed forward with that format. I like the idea of moving to a Forum based discussion, but I think this would be a good question for Patricks suggestion and rating system.. because I think people like this format. My reason for wanting to move to a WebDNA forum would be that all the data, from hence forth, would remain in tact and would be highly searchable using WebDNA's search abilities. Lets see if Patrick's suggestion system gets done, and maybe we can proceed from there... not to put presure on Patrick or anything. ;-) Donovan -- Donovan D. Brooke - VP PH/FAX: 1 (608) 291-2024 WebDNA Software Corporation 16192 Coastal Highway Lewes, DE 19958 Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Competitors! (Peter Ostry 2008)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Competitors! (Palle Bo Nielsen 2008)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Competitors! ("Kai Gradert" 2008)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Competitors! (Donovan Brooke 2008)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Competitors! ("Kai Gradert" 2008)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] Competitors! (Stuart Tremain 2008)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] Competitors! (Patrick McCormick 2008)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] Competitors! (Donovan Brooke 2008)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] Competitors! (Donovan Brooke 2008)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] Competitors! (Kai 2008)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] Competitors! (Patrick McCormick 2008)
  12. [WebDNA] Competitors! (Donovan Brooke 2008)
Kai Gradert wrote: > *Donovan,* > > Just curious, have you considered moving the WebDNA discussion/list to a > more public forum like Google Groups? That way it will be easier for new > curious folks to join the discussions. Plus you will get the benefits of > search engine crawling. > > – Kai – > > 323.304.5906 Cell > 415.869.3934 Fax Regarding the discussion format.. I would like to keep the data within WSC's control. We may want to re-do the ability to search content, and to integrate WebDNA related systems. However, I do want to get opinions... we have always used a list server such as this one. There has been a lot of misc. forums that have cropped up and left over the years, but a list server like this seems to stand the test of time. Another important point is that WebDNA has the ability to create forums. I think it would do a dis-service to the community to move our discussions to a non-WebDNA system. The Old archives is filled with great information.. however, sometime, a few years ago...formating was messed up pretty bad. Also, the looks of the system is Web Vers. 1.0! ;-) We may have this for reference on-line again, but I don't think we should proceed forward with that format. I like the idea of moving to a Forum based discussion, but I think this would be a good question for Patricks suggestion and rating system.. because I think people like this format. My reason for wanting to move to a WebDNA forum would be that all the data, from hence forth, would remain in tact and would be highly searchable using WebDNA's search abilities. Lets see if Patrick's suggestion system gets done, and maybe we can proceed from there... not to put presure on Patrick or anything. ;-) Donovan -- Donovan D. Brooke - VP PH/FAX: 1 (608) 291-2024 WebDNA Software Corporation 16192 Coastal Highway Lewes, DE 19958 Donovan Brooke

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Grepping text variable tags (was: No subject given) (2000) TeaRoom (1997) New public beta available (1997) Looking for WebCatalog Linux experience/comments. (2001) WebCat2 beta 11 - new prefs ... (1997) tab as word delimiter (2000) Page Views Database (2004) [WebDNA] Does anyone have a whois/domain management tool in WebDNA? (2009) OT: WebStar 4x needed (2001) WebCat2b12 forgets serial # (1997) writefile to create static pages (2003) WebCatalog Hosting (1996) Duplicate Hell (1999) WebCat2_Mac RETURNs in .db (1997) More than one db with the same namn (was: WC2f3) (1997) no country? (1998) Database Updates (1997) access denied problem (1997) Help with Shipping Costs (1997) Database Field Additions (2000)