Re: [WebDNA] Server load

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2008


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 100483
interpreted = N
texte = Patrick Junkroski wrote: > A lot about your questions (if I understood correctly) has to do with > general database theory, actually. That's right even though some of it is WebDNA specific. ... > So in any instance where you feel > a piece of data you had to construct through a search, lookup or > calculation will be reused, you should objectify that data. Thanks! That's the answer to one of the most important questions I had! > I would > not worry about your processor speed, unless it's a very old machine. I'm sure everybody's figured out that my post was triggered by some recent problems. ;-) I'm fairly sure these were not WebDNA related (traffic's down to less than 25 000 page visits a day and all the code on the site has been running fairly smoothly for years already) but I can't be absolutely certain and besides, streamlining the code seems like a good idea anyhow. > Hope this helps! Definitely! Again: thanks! Have to run now! Got a train to catch and several hours with nothing to do but write code on my iBook! Frank Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Server load (Frank Nordberg 2008)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Server load (Paul Willis 2008)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Server load ("Brian B. Burton" 2008)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Server load (Frank Nordberg 2008)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Server load (Terry Wilson 2008)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] Server load (Patrick Junkroski 2008)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] Server load (Frank Nordberg 2008)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] Server load ("Brian B. Burton" 2008)
  9. [WebDNA] Server load (Frank Nordberg 2008)
Patrick Junkroski wrote: > A lot about your questions (if I understood correctly) has to do with > general database theory, actually. That's right even though some of it is WebDNA specific. ... > So in any instance where you feel > a piece of data you had to construct through a search, lookup or > calculation will be reused, you should objectify that data. Thanks! That's the answer to one of the most important questions I had! > I would > not worry about your processor speed, unless it's a very old machine. I'm sure everybody's figured out that my post was triggered by some recent problems. ;-) I'm fairly sure these were not WebDNA related (traffic's down to less than 25 000 page visits a day and all the code on the site has been running fairly smoothly for years already) but I can't be absolutely certain and besides, streamlining the code seems like a good idea anyhow. > Hope this helps! Definitely! Again: thanks! Have to run now! Got a train to catch and several hours with nothing to do but write code on my iBook! Frank Frank Nordberg

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

U&P IIS concept (1998) windows file upload = weirdness (2004) There's a bug in the math context ... (1997) WebCatalog/Mac 2.1b2 New Features (1997) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [include] (1997) Help name our technology! (1997) Keep away (1997) WebCat2 Append problem (B14Macacgi) (1997) emailer (1997) [LOOKUP] (1997) carriage returns in data (1997) Sorting by SKU Not Working (1998) Download capabilities (1997) WebTen Type 2 Crash on start (2000) (1997) [WebDNA] Enhancements to "list" contexts ... (2015) price formula (1999) search zip codes ranges (2003) Talk List Suggestions (1997) updating with ProductEditor (1998)