Re: [WebDNA] DNA suffix
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2008
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 100853
interpreted = N
texte = I have just addedPowered by
WebDNAto the footer of SearchBoise.com, so it's now on about 1000 pages. Search=Boise has a PR of 4, so=20hopefully that will help.-DanOn Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:37:15 -0400 "Psi Prime, Matthew A Perosi "
wrote:> Here's some help I'll offer. At the footer of all my websites I have m=y company name and a link=20>to my company website. I'll start adding a link next to it saying "powe=red by webdna" and link=20>to webdna.us. Many of my sites are Google PR3 to PR5, so that link juic=e should pass along some=20>good credibility.>=20> BTW I have 261 WebDNA sites and counting, I'll get them all linked over= time.>=20> Matthew A Perosi |> Psi Prime, Inc. |> http://www.psiprime.com |> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psi_Prime%2C_Inc |> 323 Union Blvd. |> Totowa, NJ 07512 |> P: 973.413.8210 |>F: 973.413.8217 |>=20>=20>=20> Christophe Billiottet wrote:>> Sure! this is the case for everybody, so in no case shall we modify=20>> the existing suffixes. But from now on, it would be nice to start=20>> using the .dna suffix... any help in any way is more than welcome, we=20>> are building something big! ;-)>>>> - chris>>>> On Sep 18, 2008, at 11:00, PLANET DJ (Chris W.) wrote:>>>>> I agree with all that was said, EXCEPT... I certainly don't want to=20>>> lose my Google Page Rank and SEO just because the software platform=20>>> wants to change extensions. I would gladly code new sites using .dna,==20>>> but the existing ones need to stay as .tpl.>>>>>> Best Regards,>>>>>> Chris Whybrew>>> Senior Account Manager>>>>>>>>> PLANET DJ INC>>> www.planetdj.com>>>>>> p: 775.323.1540 ext 3903>>> f: 775.323.8230>>> e: chrisw@planetdj.com>>>>>>>>> From: "JD Ready" >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:32 AM>>> To: talk@webdna.us>>> Subject: Re: [WebDNA] DNA suffix>>>>>> Well, for my 2 cents, I'm new to WebDNA, but I have to agree with=20>>> Christophe. I have programmed in asp, aspx & php and I like seeing=20>>> the common extension of the language I coded in if for no other=20>>> reason to know at a glance what I wrote the site in after not working==20>>> on it for a couple of years.>>>>>> Additionally, I like knowing what other sites have been written in in==20>>> the event I think something's "cool" and I want to know how the=20>>> programmer did it.>>>>>> And finally, the Christophe's point, if you guys are to "resurect"=20>>> webDNA and have it rise like a pheonix from the ashes (a quote from=20>>> someone's earlier post), then I think you want as much brand=20>>> recognition as you can get. I know that when I see a website that @=20>>> know is dynamic but is using an extension that I don't recognize, I=20>>> often look it up to see what it is.>>>>>> And finally, about using .html. I would not recommend that. We all=20>>> have control over our servers it would appear. However, in a shared=20>>> hosting environment you often don't. If WebDNA ever gets widely=20>>> adopted, the hosting companies are not going to map .html to webDNA -==20>>> just like they don't do it for asp or php. Also, as a programmer, I=20>>> expect .htm or .html files to be pure html and would think it odd and==20>>> possibly even incorrect (regardless of whether its possible) to have=20>>> webdna script in a file designated as html.>>>>>> Anyway, that my 2 cents having been involved with webDNA for the past==20>>> 5 days. :)>>>>>> ----------------------->>> Sent from my Treo(r) smartphone>>>>>> -----Original Message----->>> From: Christophe Billiottet>>> Date: Wednesday, Sep 17, 2008 10:50 am>>> Subject: Re: [WebDNA] DNA suffix>>> To: Reply-To:>>>>>> Well, this was just that WebDNA, as a web scripting language, is far>>> far behind the others in terms of number of active servers and sites.>>> If you check a php site, there is nothing different between it and an=y>>> other html site, except for the .php suffix that makes it immediately>>> identifiable: "ah! this is another php site" ;-)>>> PHP too can use any other suffix (just a matter of mapping it) but th=e>>> default suffix is .php and it seems everybody is satisfied with it.>>> Same with .asp>>>>>> The suffix identifies a technology, and we, WebDNA users, decided to>>> hide our technology.>>>>>> I guess this is not a very good idea if we want to make WebDNA a>>> winner product...>>>>>> chris>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 17, 2008, at 12:58, Tom Duke wrote:>>>>>> > Hi,>>>>>> > Have to say that I agree with Dan.>>>>>> > I would certainly support setting .dna as the default suffix - but =I>>> like the fact that my sites are not clearly identified with any>>> technology. I also hide the bit with>>> WebDNA comments so there should be no easy way for a user to>>> determine the server side scripting language used.>>>>>> > I would think this would be considered good security practice.>>>>>> > - Tom>>>>>> >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------->>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to>>> the mailing list .>>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to:>>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us>>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------->>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to>>> the mailing list .>>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to:>>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us>>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------->> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to>> the mailing list .>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
I have just addedPowered by WebDNAto the footer of SearchBoise.com, so it's now on about 1000 pages. Search=Boise has a PR of 4, so=20hopefully that will help.-DanOn Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:37:15 -0400 "Psi Prime, Matthew A Perosi " wrote:> Here's some help I'll offer. At the footer of all my websites I have m=y company name and a link=20>to my company website. I'll start adding a link next to it saying "powe=red by webdna" and link=20>to webdna.us. Many of my sites are Google PR3 to PR5, so that link juic=e should pass along some=20>good credibility.>=20> BTW I have 261 WebDNA sites and counting, I'll get them all linked over= time.>=20> Matthew A Perosi |> Psi Prime, Inc. |> http://www.psiprime.com |> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psi_Prime%2C_Inc |> 323 Union Blvd. |> Totowa, NJ 07512 |> P: 973.413.8210 |>F: 973.413.8217 |>=20>=20>=20> Christophe Billiottet wrote:>> Sure! this is the case for everybody, so in no case shall we modify=20>> the existing suffixes. But from now on, it would be nice to start=20>> using the .dna suffix... any help in any way is more than welcome, we=20>> are building something big! ;-)>>>> - chris>>>> On Sep 18, 2008, at 11:00, PLANET DJ (Chris W.) wrote:>>>>> I agree with all that was said, EXCEPT... I certainly don't want to=20>>> lose my Google Page Rank and SEO just because the software platform=20>>> wants to change extensions. I would gladly code new sites using .dna,==20>>> but the existing ones need to stay as .tpl.>>>>>> Best Regards,>>>>>> Chris Whybrew>>> Senior Account Manager>>>>>>>>> PLANET DJ INC>>> www.planetdj.com>>>>>> p: 775.323.1540 ext 3903>>> f: 775.323.8230>>> e: chrisw@planetdj.com>>>>>>>>> From: "JD Ready" >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:32 AM>>> To: talk@webdna.us>>> Subject: Re: [WebDNA] DNA suffix>>>>>> Well, for my 2 cents, I'm new to WebDNA, but I have to agree with=20>>> Christophe. I have programmed in asp, aspx & php and I like seeing=20>>> the common extension of the language I coded in if for no other=20>>> reason to know at a glance what I wrote the site in after not working==20>>> on it for a couple of years.>>>>>> Additionally, I like knowing what other sites have been written in in==20>>> the event I think something's "cool" and I want to know how the=20>>> programmer did it.>>>>>> And finally, the Christophe's point, if you guys are to "resurect"=20>>> webDNA and have it rise like a pheonix from the ashes (a quote from=20>>> someone's earlier post), then I think you want as much brand=20>>> recognition as you can get. I know that when I see a website that @=20>>> know is dynamic but is using an extension that I don't recognize, I=20>>> often look it up to see what it is.>>>>>> And finally, about using .html. I would not recommend that. We all=20>>> have control over our servers it would appear. However, in a shared=20>>> hosting environment you often don't. If WebDNA ever gets widely=20>>> adopted, the hosting companies are not going to map .html to webDNA -==20>>> just like they don't do it for asp or php. Also, as a programmer, I=20>>> expect .htm or .html files to be pure html and would think it odd and==20>>> possibly even incorrect (regardless of whether its possible) to have=20>>> webdna script in a file designated as html.>>>>>> Anyway, that my 2 cents having been involved with webDNA for the past==20>>> 5 days. :)>>>>>> ----------------------->>> Sent from my Treo(r) smartphone>>>>>> -----Original Message----->>> From: Christophe Billiottet>>> Date: Wednesday, Sep 17, 2008 10:50 am>>> Subject: Re: [WebDNA] DNA suffix>>> To: Reply-To:>>>>>> Well, this was just that WebDNA, as a web scripting language, is far>>> far behind the others in terms of number of active servers and sites.>>> If you check a php site, there is nothing different between it and an=y>>> other html site, except for the .php suffix that makes it immediately>>> identifiable: "ah! this is another php site" ;-)>>> PHP too can use any other suffix (just a matter of mapping it) but th=e>>> default suffix is .php and it seems everybody is satisfied with it.>>> Same with .asp>>>>>> The suffix identifies a technology, and we, WebDNA users, decided to>>> hide our technology.>>>>>> I guess this is not a very good idea if we want to make WebDNA a>>> winner product...>>>>>> chris>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 17, 2008, at 12:58, Tom Duke wrote:>>>>>> > Hi,>>>>>> > Have to say that I agree with Dan.>>>>>> > I would certainly support setting .dna as the default suffix - but =I>>> like the fact that my sites are not clearly identified with any>>> technology. I also hide the bit with>>> WebDNA comments so there should be no easy way for a user to>>> determine the server side scripting language used.>>>>>> > I would think this would be considered good security practice.>>>>>> > - Tom>>>>>> >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------->>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to>>> the mailing list .>>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to:>>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us>>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------->>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to>>> the mailing list .>>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to:>>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us>>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------->> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to>> the mailing list .>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/
"Dan Strong"
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
PCS Frames-Default page is solution! (1997)
Cancel Subscription (1996)
taxRate is fine but taxTotal isn't (1997)
[WriteFile] problems (1997)
Forms Search Questions (1997)
RE: IIS4b2 and WebCatalog b19 (1997)
Too many database headers? (2003)
Encryption of E-mail (1998)
Formulas.db / Quantity Discount problem (1998)
process out of control....... (2002)
[OT] PHP?MySQL Help Needed (2003)
Assigning new CART number (1997)
WebTrends (2002)
ShipCosts database (1997)
PC Authorize & Webmerchant (1998)
WebCat2b12--[searchstring] bug (1997)
shipcost (1997)
More on the email templates (1997)
[delete] problem (1997)
Weighting of grouped results possible? (was: grouping fieldsquestion) (1998)