Re: [WebDNA] Is a '.webdna' suffix better?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2008


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 100861
interpreted = N
texte = On Sep 18, 2008, at 23:54, Psi Prime, Matthew A Perosi wrote: > There's an easy fix for the Google issue Ken just mentioned, and it > also goes back to something I said earlier today about linking back > to www.webdna.us with the phrase "powered by webdna" excellent idea. Dan just did this too (thank you Dan!) > I'm not sure how many of you guys deal with SEO on a daily basis, > but I have a person here that knows a lot about it and I'm currently > running through a 60+ hour training class. > > If we developers are going to link back to www.webdna.us the new > owners should figure out what exact keywords they want us to use. > This afternoon I put this link at the bottom of IJODiamonds.com > > WebDNA > server side scripting language > > The keywords here are "server side scripting language" > But if we want people to find the new file type the link could be > ".dna scripting language" another good idea. > If enough of us with G.PR4 and above use a link like that we can > correct the Google search within a week or two. > > While we are on the topic of Google and searching for "WebDNA." > Donovan or Christopher, you should see if SMSI would be willing to > contact Google and remove all the cached pages that are still > floating around. Since the smithmicro.com website is not producing > 404 errors, Google will maintain those cached copies for a very long > time. If the SMSI guys are clueless, tell them to contact Google > through the Google Webmaster Tools and request the pages to be > removed. webdna.smithmicro.com is just pointing at dev.webdna.us: SmithMicro kindly changed their IP for our. So, this is our pages. > As for the .webdna extension, I think the idea of a 6 character file > extension is bad and it will confuse people into thinking the > website is a virus or something of the like. agreed. - chris > > Matthew A Perosi | > Psi Prime, Inc. | > http://www.psiprime.com | > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psi_Prime%2C_Inc | > 323 Union Blvd. | > Totowa, NJ 07512 | > P: 973.413.8210 | > F: 973.413.8217 | > > > > Kenneth Grome wrote: >> Since you all seem so interested in this default suffix issue I'm >> going to chime in here: >> >> I just did a Google search for ".dna" only to learn that there's >> not a single mention of WebDNA in the first ten pages -- and my >> pages are set to display 100 hits at a time -- which means WebDNA >> does not appear in the first 1000 Google hits. >> Isn't the point of using a new default suffix so that people who do >> not recognize it will 'get curious' and do a search for it in >> Google or some other web search engine? Or am I missing something >> here? >> >> If you're going to bother changing things, why don't you use the >> full software name as the suffix? The string "webdna" is certainly >> short enough to use in a suffix! >> >> For the above reasons and more I think the new default suffix >> should be ".webdna" ... and that's my two cents! >> >> :) >> >> Sincerely, >> Ken Grome >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >> >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Is a '.webdna' suffix better? (Paul Willis 2008)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Is a '.webdna' suffix better? (Chris 2008)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Is a '.webdna' suffix better? (Paul Willis 2008)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Is a '.webdna' suffix better? (Paul Willis 2008)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Is a '.webdna' suffix better? ( 2008)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] Is a '.webdna' suffix better? (Chris 2008)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] Is a '.webdna' suffix better? ( 2008)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] Is a '.webdna' suffix better? (Rob 2008)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] Is a '.webdna' suffix better? ("Psi Prime, Matthew A Perosi " 2008)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] Is a '.webdna' suffix better? (Paul Willis 2008)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] Is a '.webdna' suffix better? (Steve Craig 2008)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] Is a '.webdna' suffix better? (Chris 2008)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] Is a '.webdna' suffix better? (Chris 2008)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] Is a '.webdna' suffix better? ("Psi Prime, Matthew A Perosi " 2008)
  15. [WebDNA] Is a '.webdna' suffix better? (Kenneth Grome 2008)
On Sep 18, 2008, at 23:54, Psi Prime, Matthew A Perosi wrote: > There's an easy fix for the Google issue Ken just mentioned, and it > also goes back to something I said earlier today about linking back > to www.webdna.us with the phrase "powered by webdna" excellent idea. Dan just did this too (thank you Dan!) > I'm not sure how many of you guys deal with SEO on a daily basis, > but I have a person here that knows a lot about it and I'm currently > running through a 60+ hour training class. > > If we developers are going to link back to www.webdna.us the new > owners should figure out what exact keywords they want us to use. > This afternoon I put this link at the bottom of IJODiamonds.com > > WebDNA > server side scripting language > > The keywords here are "server side scripting language" > But if we want people to find the new file type the link could be > ".dna scripting language" another good idea. > If enough of us with G.PR4 and above use a link like that we can > correct the Google search within a week or two. > > While we are on the topic of Google and searching for "WebDNA." > Donovan or Christopher, you should see if SMSI would be willing to > contact Google and remove all the cached pages that are still > floating around. Since the smithmicro.com website is not producing > 404 errors, Google will maintain those cached copies for a very long > time. If the SMSI guys are clueless, tell them to contact Google > through the Google Webmaster Tools and request the pages to be > removed. webdna.smithmicro.com is just pointing at dev.webdna.us: SmithMicro kindly changed their IP for our. So, this is our pages. > As for the .webdna extension, I think the idea of a 6 character file > extension is bad and it will confuse people into thinking the > website is a virus or something of the like. agreed. - chris > > Matthew A Perosi | > Psi Prime, Inc. | > http://www.psiprime.com | > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psi_Prime%2C_Inc | > 323 Union Blvd. | > Totowa, NJ 07512 | > P: 973.413.8210 | > F: 973.413.8217 | > > > > Kenneth Grome wrote: >> Since you all seem so interested in this default suffix issue I'm >> going to chime in here: >> >> I just did a Google search for ".dna" only to learn that there's >> not a single mention of WebDNA in the first ten pages -- and my >> pages are set to display 100 hits at a time -- which means WebDNA >> does not appear in the first 1000 Google hits. >> Isn't the point of using a new default suffix so that people who do >> not recognize it will 'get curious' and do a search for it in >> Google or some other web search engine? Or am I missing something >> here? >> >> If you're going to bother changing things, why don't you use the >> full software name as the suffix? The string "webdna" is certainly >> short enough to use in a suffix! >> >> For the above reasons and more I think the new default suffix >> should be ".webdna" ... and that's my two cents! >> >> :) >> >> Sincerely, >> Ken Grome >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >> >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ Christophe Billiottet

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Using Plug-In while running 1.6.1 (1997) Error messages (2004) [WebDNA] Permissions Error (2014) IIS4b2 and WebCatalog b19 (1997) Sorry I didn't pay attention-but ??? (1997) OT: SEO (2007) [WebDNA] Was there ever a BeOS compatible version? (2009) Question about replacing words (1998) b12 cannot limit records returned and more. (1997) RAM variables (1997) [showif [getcookie otherDomain]=yes] inside a [TCP connect] will work? (2000) Multi Colonns (1998) [WebDNA] Anyone used these people ? (2010) [WebDNA] jumpstart me? - how to auto-upload to a remote server? (2010) Country & Ship-to address & other fields ? (1997) New WebCatalog Version !!! (1997) webcat- multiple selection in input field (1997) Sorting error (1997) WebCat2: multiple currency support (1997) calculating tax rates, mail order solutions and version 2 (1997)