RE: [WebDNA] Build Name for 6.1

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2008


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 101023
interpreted = N
texte = This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0023_01C923B5.C7C2E0A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It may be the marketing person in me talking, but personally I don=92t = think the word =93bug=94 should be implied anywhere when trying to sell = software=85heh=85 (Just my 2 cents.) =20 I like Phoenix, too, for what it=92s worth=85 ;) =20 Tana =20 From: Lawrence [mailto:Lawrence@authorsimage.com]=20 Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 5:27 AM To: talk@webdna.us Subject: Re: [WebDNA] Build Name for 6.1 =20 I vote for Phoenix! it looks nicer if you want to make a design with = it... Lawrence Lawrence Banahan HYPERLINK "mailto:lb@authorsimage.com"lb@authorsimage.com ____________________________ Author=92s Image 96-98 rue de Montreuil 75011 Paris - France Tel. Direct : +33 (0)4 93 42 21 62 Tel. Agence:+33 (0)1 43 27 36 36 Mob.: +33 (0)6 80 71 99 02 HYPERLINK "http://www.authorsimage.com"http://www.authorsimage.com ____________________________ Donovan Brooke a =E9crit :=20 Hello,=20 As we work on the 6.1 free patch.. we thought=20 it wuold be nice to have a build name for it.=20 I know, it's only a patch.. but=20 it's been a long time since WebDNA has had a=20 patch.. :-) so we see this one as significant.=20 I came up with "CICADA".. being that these creatures=20 hide away for a few years before comming back to=20 life. ;-)=20 However, I'd like to hear your suggestions.=20 Donovan=20 =20 =20 No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.7.5/1700 - Release Date: = 9/30/2008 11:03 AM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG.=20 Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.7.5/1702 - Release Date: = 10/1/2008 9:05 AM =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0023_01C923B5.C7C2E0A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

It may be the marketing person in me talking, but = personally I don’t think the word “bug” should be implied anywhere = when trying to sell software…heh…=A0 (Just my 2 = cents.)

 

I like Phoenix, too, for what it’s worth… = ;)

 

Tana

 

From: Lawrence [mailto:Lawrence@authorsimage.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 5:27 AM
To: talk@webdna.us
Subject: Re: [WebDNA] Build Name for 6.1

 

I vote for Phoenix! = it looks nicer if you want to make a design with it...

Lawrence


Lawrence Banahan
lb@authorsimage.com
____________________________
Author’= ;s Image=
 96-98 rue de Montreuil
75011 Paris - France

Tel. Direct : +33 (0)4 93 42 21 62
Tel. Agence:+33 (0)1 43 27 36 36
Mob.: +33 (0)6 80 71 99 02

http://www.authorsimage.com
____________________________

Donovan Brooke a =E9crit :

Hello,

As we work on the 6.1 free patch.. we thought
it wuold be nice to have a build name for it.

I know, it's only a patch.. but
it's been a long time since WebDNA has had a
patch.. :-)  so we see this one as significant.

I came up with "CICADA".. being that these creatures
hide away for a few years before comming back to
life. ;-)

However, I'd like to hear your suggestions.

Donovan



 

 

No virus found in = this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.7.5/1700 - Release Date: = 9/30/2008 11:03 AM


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.7.5/1702 - Release Date: = 10/1/2008 9:05 AM

------=_NextPart_000_0023_01C923B5.C7C2E0A0-- Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Build Name for 6.1 (Donovan Brooke 2008)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Build Name for 6.1 ("Dan Strong" 2008)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Build Name for 6.1 ("Psi Prime, Matthew A Perosi " 2008)
  4. RE: [WebDNA] Build Name for 6.1 ("Tana Adams" 2008)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Build Name for 6.1 ("Vijay-Kumar Solanki" 2008)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] Build Name for 6.1 (Donovan Brooke 2008)
  7. RE: [WebDNA] Build Name for 6.1 ("Michael A. DeLorenzo" 2008)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] Build Name for 6.1 (Terry Wilson 2008)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] Build Name for 6.1 (Paul Willis 2008)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] Build Name for 6.1 (Lawrence 2008)
  11. RE: [WebDNA] Build Name for 6.1 ("Vincent Medina" 2008)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] Build Name for 6.1 (Dean Smith 2008)
  13. RE: [WebDNA] Build Name for 6.1 ("Olin Lagon" 2008)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] Build Name for 6.1 (Grant Hulbert 2008)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] Build Name for 6.1 ("Psi Prime, Matthew A Perosi " 2008)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] Build Name for 6.1 (Donovan Brooke 2008)
  17. Re: [WebDNA] Build Name for 6.1 (Chris 2008)
  18. Re: [WebDNA] Build Name for 6.1 ("Psi Prime, Matthew A Perosi " 2008)
  19. Re: [WebDNA] Build Name for 6.1 ("Dan Strong" 2008)
  20. RE: [WebDNA] Build Name for 6.1 ("Timothy D Benson" 2008)
  21. Re: [WebDNA] Build Name for 6.1 (Govinda 2008)
  22. Re: [WebDNA] Build Name for 6.1 (Dylan Wood 2008)
  23. Re: [WebDNA] Build Name for 6.1 ( 2008)
This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0023_01C923B5.C7C2E0A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It may be the marketing person in me talking, but personally I don=92t = think the word =93bug=94 should be implied anywhere when trying to sell = software=85heh=85 (Just my 2 cents.) =20 I like Phoenix, too, for what it=92s worth=85 ;) =20 Tana =20 From: Lawrence [mailto:Lawrence@authorsimage.com]=20 Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 5:27 AM To: talk@webdna.us Subject: Re: [WebDNA] Build Name for 6.1 =20 I vote for Phoenix! it looks nicer if you want to make a design with = it... Lawrence Lawrence Banahan HYPERLINK "mailto:lb@authorsimage.com"lb@authorsimage.com ____________________________ Author=92s Image 96-98 rue de Montreuil 75011 Paris - France Tel. Direct : +33 (0)4 93 42 21 62 Tel. Agence:+33 (0)1 43 27 36 36 Mob.: +33 (0)6 80 71 99 02 HYPERLINK "http://www.authorsimage.com"http://www.authorsimage.com ____________________________ Donovan Brooke a =E9crit :=20 Hello,=20 As we work on the 6.1 free patch.. we thought=20 it wuold be nice to have a build name for it.=20 I know, it's only a patch.. but=20 it's been a long time since WebDNA has had a=20 patch.. :-) so we see this one as significant.=20 I came up with "CICADA".. being that these creatures=20 hide away for a few years before comming back to=20 life. ;-)=20 However, I'd like to hear your suggestions.=20 Donovan=20 =20 =20 No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.7.5/1700 - Release Date: = 9/30/2008 11:03 AM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG.=20 Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.7.5/1702 - Release Date: = 10/1/2008 9:05 AM =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0023_01C923B5.C7C2E0A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

It may be the marketing person in me talking, but = personally I don’t think the word “bug” should be implied anywhere = when trying to sell software…heh…=A0 (Just my 2 = cents.)

 

I like Phoenix, too, for what it’s worth… = ;)

 

Tana

 

From: Lawrence [mailto:Lawrence@authorsimage.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 5:27 AM
To: talk@webdna.us
Subject: Re: [WebDNA] Build Name for 6.1

 

I vote for Phoenix! = it looks nicer if you want to make a design with it...

Lawrence


Lawrence Banahan
lb@authorsimage.com
____________________________
Author’= ;s Image=
 96-98 rue de Montreuil
75011 Paris - France

Tel. Direct : +33 (0)4 93 42 21 62
Tel. Agence:+33 (0)1 43 27 36 36
Mob.: +33 (0)6 80 71 99 02

http://www.authorsimage.com
____________________________

Donovan Brooke a =E9crit :

Hello,

As we work on the 6.1 free patch.. we thought
it wuold be nice to have a build name for it.

I know, it's only a patch.. but
it's been a long time since WebDNA has had a
patch.. :-)  so we see this one as significant.

I came up with "CICADA".. being that these creatures
hide away for a few years before comming back to
life. ;-)

However, I'd like to hear your suggestions.

Donovan



 

 

No virus found in = this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.7.5/1700 - Release Date: = 9/30/2008 11:03 AM


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.7.5/1702 - Release Date: = 10/1/2008 9:05 AM

------=_NextPart_000_0023_01C923B5.C7C2E0A0-- "Tana Adams"

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Which is Faster (1998) Sporadic database errors (2005) Date search - yes or no (1997) PCS Frames-Default page is solution! (1997) Email Mac (2002) Execute Applescript (1997) WebCat2 several catalogs? (1997) CyberSource component for WebCatalog? (2000) problems with 2 tags (1997) 4.5.1 download link (2003) [dos] command and [math] (1998) Strange intermittent WebDNA problems (2008) searching illegal HTML (2002) Processing all html files through WebCat or Typhoon (1998) WC2.0 Memory Requirements (1997) [include ...] behavior (1997) WebSTAR 2.1 freezes my Mac (1997) Pithy questions on webcommerce & siteedit (1997) WebCatalog can't find database (1997) Text data with spaces in them... (1997)