Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64"
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2008
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 101282
interpreted = N
texte = > I've never had a need to calculate in webdna more than 15> characters. That's why I asked in the beginning of my> post if it could calculate that high.I noticed your concern when you first posted, but I was already thinking up a way to do this using alphanum chars and db's and such ... which is why this issue didn't raise its ugly head until I decided to try your approach.> However, thinking further out of the hat here, you could> still use the same method, just use a smaller prime> number and instead of starting with a 40 digit number,> break it down into manageable segments, do the> calculations, then concatenate it back together again.This may be the best way to keep it all in webdna. Then again, I really like Bob's suggestion because it would appear to be more elegant than chopping up the original value into little pieces simply to "make it work" within [math]s limitations.> I still feel that a mathematical approach is much faster> than anything anyone can put together with databases or> tables.Me too, that's why I like your concept, we simply have to bypass [math]s limits one way or the other ...Sincerely,Ken Grome
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
> I've never had a need to calculate in webdna more than 15> characters. That's why I asked in the beginning of my> post if it could calculate that high.I noticed your concern when you first posted, but I was already thinking up a way to do this using alphanum chars and db's and such ... which is why this issue didn't raise its ugly head until I decided to try your approach.> However, thinking further out of the hat here, you could> still use the same method, just use a smaller prime> number and instead of starting with a 40 digit number,> break it down into manageable segments, do the> calculations, then concatenate it back together again.This may be the best way to keep it all in webdna. Then again, I really like Bob's suggestion because it would appear to be more elegant than chopping up the original value into little pieces simply to "make it work" within
[math]s limitations.> I still feel that a mathematical approach is much faster> than anything anyone can put together with databases or> tables.Me too, that's why I like your concept, we simply have to bypass
[math]s limits one way or the other ...Sincerely,Ken Grome
Kenneth Grome
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
why why why (2004)
Multiple catalog databases and showcart (1997)
Comments in db? (1997)
Emailer problems. (1998)
[OT] was WebDNA on a Raq4i (2003)
[WebDNA] IIS 7.5 (2015)
Tiger / WebDNA (2005)
Include a big block of text (1997)
Bizarre behavior texta behavior (2004)
Speaking of () Emailer not working (1998)
Running 2 two WebCatalog.acgi's (1996)
Emailer setup (1997)
ShowNext Command (1997)
Country & Ship-to address & other fields ? (1997)
[defined]ish (1997)
Password and Allow commands (1998)
Beta and new version questions? (1998)
b18 problem on NT 4.0 (1997)
WebCat2 - Getting to the browser's username/password data (1997)
[shownext max=?] armed (1997)