Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64"
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2008
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 101282
interpreted = N
texte = > I've never had a need to calculate in webdna more than 15> characters. That's why I asked in the beginning of my> post if it could calculate that high.I noticed your concern when you first posted, but I was already thinking up a way to do this using alphanum chars and db's and such ... which is why this issue didn't raise its ugly head until I decided to try your approach.> However, thinking further out of the hat here, you could> still use the same method, just use a smaller prime> number and instead of starting with a 40 digit number,> break it down into manageable segments, do the> calculations, then concatenate it back together again.This may be the best way to keep it all in webdna. Then again, I really like Bob's suggestion because it would appear to be more elegant than chopping up the original value into little pieces simply to "make it work" within [math]s limitations.> I still feel that a mathematical approach is much faster> than anything anyone can put together with databases or> tables.Me too, that's why I like your concept, we simply have to bypass [math]s limits one way or the other ...Sincerely,Ken Grome
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
> I've never had a need to calculate in webdna more than 15> characters. That's why I asked in the beginning of my> post if it could calculate that high.I noticed your concern when you first posted, but I was already thinking up a way to do this using alphanum chars and db's and such ... which is why this issue didn't raise its ugly head until I decided to try your approach.> However, thinking further out of the hat here, you could> still use the same method, just use a smaller prime> number and instead of starting with a 40 digit number,> break it down into manageable segments, do the> calculations, then concatenate it back together again.This may be the best way to keep it all in webdna. Then again, I really like Bob's suggestion because it would appear to be more elegant than chopping up the original value into little pieces simply to "make it work" within
[math]s limitations.> I still feel that a mathematical approach is much faster> than anything anyone can put together with databases or> tables.Me too, that's why I like your concept, we simply have to bypass
[math]s limits one way or the other ...Sincerely,Ken Grome
Kenneth Grome
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Locking up with WebCatalog... (1997)
OT: Windows-based Code Editor (2002)
WCf2 and nested tags (1997)
Just Started (1998)
Sorting a Search... (1998)
Search in 2 or more catalogs (1997)
[taxRate] [TaxTotal] ? (1997)
OT: Too many lines too add in one go (2003)
Card clearance, problems - solutions? (1997)
Next (1997)
Error Lob.db records error message not name (1997)
webcat 2.1 new cart fields - please explain more (1998)
back one? (2000)
MacWEEK article help needed (1996)
Listfiles context (2000)
MATH PROBLEM (1997)
RE: IIS4b2 and WebCatalog b19 (1997)
Date problems-more (1997)
[protect admin] (1997)
Suffix or Line? (1999)