Re: [WebDNA] o search engines index .db files?
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2009
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 102864
interpreted = N
texte = ...same here... http://www.SearchBoise.com is essentially a 10-page site =made to look like a 600+=20page, easily-indexed site thanks to a .db (there's more than one .db, but= you get the idea). As=20for your direct question, no, I do not believe a .db file would ever be a=ccessed and indexed by a=20search engine, and even if it was, I wouldn't think the indexing would ma=ke much sense to=20anybody... now if you converted the .db to an .xml file then maybe you co=uld play ball, but as has=20been pointed out, converting the data in the .db file into human-readable= webpages would yield the=20SEO that your client is seeking. -DanOn Mon, 6 Jul 2009 23:17:09 -0400 Terry Wilson
wrote:> Agree; much more relevant and easier to implement. Besides, I wouldn't= want a .db searched; too=20>much other info in there that's none of anyone's business (settings wit=h phone #s. etc.).>=20> I have done this on some websites in the form of a description =20> listing with a search box at the top to make it look more like a delib=erate page. You could add=20>links to a detail page. Here's what I did for one client:=20>http://sportingspirit.com/index.html?goto=3Dsearch>=20> Terry>=20> On Jul 6, 2009, at 10:51 PM, Stuart Tremain wrote:>=20>> I would build a page that displays all the data in the format that =20>> you want the search engine to see and make sense of. The search =20>> engine is not going to make sense of a flat data file.>>>>>> This is what I have done for one of my clients>>>> http://www.opsmdirect.com.au/contact-lenses.html>>>>>> Regards>>>> Stuart Tremain>> IDFK Web Developments>> AUSTRALIA>> webdna@idfk.com.au>>>> On 07/07/2009, at 11:36 AM, sbraun wrote:>>>>> Hi all,>>> I hope everyone had a safe and happy US Independence Day.>>>>>> I have coded an e-Newsletter and a 'one-way' Blog for my client to =20>>> use to contact his customers.>>> They each have a database of his various articles and entries.>>>>>> My client has hired a third-party SEO analysis of the pages that I =20>>> built for him.>>> The SEO analysis company has asked him to ask me if the .db files =20>>> of his articles can be indexed and searchable by the major search =20>>> engines.>>>>>> So I'm asking all of you what you know....>>> Can a .db file type be indexed and searched by the various search =20>>> engines out there?>>>>>> Would a long path name hinder this indexing? Like =20>>> www.MyClient.com/newsletter/files/newsletter.db>>>>>> Thanks for any experience.>>>>>> Steve Braun>>> sbraun1@twcny.rr.com>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------->>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to>>> the mailing list .>>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us>>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/>>>> --------------------------------------------------------->> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to>> the mailing list .>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/>=20> ---------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
...same here... http://www.SearchBoise.com is essentially a 10-page site =made to look like a 600+=20page, easily-indexed site thanks to a .db (there's more than one .db, but= you get the idea). As=20for your direct question, no, I do not believe a .db file would ever be a=ccessed and indexed by a=20search engine, and even if it was, I wouldn't think the indexing would ma=ke much sense to=20anybody... now if you converted the .db to an .xml file then maybe you co=uld play ball, but as has=20been pointed out, converting the data in the .db file into human-readable= webpages would yield the=20SEO that your client is seeking. -DanOn Mon, 6 Jul 2009 23:17:09 -0400 Terry Wilson wrote:> Agree; much more relevant and easier to implement. Besides, I wouldn't= want a .db searched; too=20>much other info in there that's none of anyone's business (settings wit=h phone #s. etc.).>=20> I have done this on some websites in the form of a description =20> listing with a search box at the top to make it look more like a delib=erate page. You could add=20>links to a detail page. Here's what I did for one client:=20>http://sportingspirit.com/index.html?goto=3Dsearch>=20> Terry>=20> On Jul 6, 2009, at 10:51 PM, Stuart Tremain wrote:>=20>> I would build a page that displays all the data in the format that =20>> you want the search engine to see and make sense of. The search =20>> engine is not going to make sense of a flat data file.>>>>>> This is what I have done for one of my clients>>>> http://www.opsmdirect.com.au/contact-lenses.html>>>>>> Regards>>>> Stuart Tremain>> IDFK Web Developments>> AUSTRALIA>> webdna@idfk.com.au>>>> On 07/07/2009, at 11:36 AM, sbraun wrote:>>>>> Hi all,>>> I hope everyone had a safe and happy US Independence Day.>>>>>> I have coded an e-Newsletter and a 'one-way' Blog for my client to =20>>> use to contact his customers.>>> They each have a database of his various articles and entries.>>>>>> My client has hired a third-party SEO analysis of the pages that I =20>>> built for him.>>> The SEO analysis company has asked him to ask me if the .db files =20>>> of his articles can be indexed and searchable by the major search =20>>> engines.>>>>>> So I'm asking all of you what you know....>>> Can a .db file type be indexed and searched by the various search =20>>> engines out there?>>>>>> Would a long path name hinder this indexing? Like =20>>> www.MyClient.com/newsletter/files/newsletter.db>>>>>> Thanks for any experience.>>>>>> Steve Braun>>> sbraun1@twcny.rr.com>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------->>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to>>> the mailing list .>>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us>>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/>>>> --------------------------------------------------------->> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to>> the mailing list .>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/>=20> ---------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/
"Dan Strong"
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Fufillment e-mail? (1998)
Help with Shipping Costs (1997)
delete after x (1998)
Add a field to the error log? (1997)
Banner DNA (1997)
template cache problem (1998)
Multiple catalog databases and showcart (1997)
RE: ANother SHOWIF problem (1997)
Re:PCS Customer submissions ? (1997)
sendmail in html format? (2002)
popups, netscape vs explorer (1997)
Updating a database once per day - An example (1998)
Up and running ... at last !! (1997)
Combining Searches (1998)
WebCat2b13 Command Reference Doc error (1997)
RE: ShowNext Command (1997)
[WebDNA] behavior of [thisurl] in the context of 'mod_rewrite' (2012)
Conflicting WebStar Cache Settings? (2000)
[WebDNA] WebDNA Host being retired (2014)
Database changes (1998)