Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> <DNA_Showif "expr=_____"> also broken when we compare against something with a "!" in it.
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2009
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 103256
interpreted = N
texte = Hello Govinda! right, got the same as you do. I personnally use [URL][/ URL] and
only when necessary, meaning only when a statement without these tags will not show what i expect. In my specific case, i almost never use these tags without any side effect. Anyway, we will look into the original code to fix the URL tag inside
files. Thank you! - chris On Aug 15, 2009, at 21:48, John Butler wrote: >> Yes, > >> [snip] >> >> however, >> >> [snip] > >> works. >> >> We'll make a note of it, thanks. >> >> Donovan > > Thanks D., > Yes, I worked around that [redirect] OK. > > Still lingering in my mind though, is that other issue I touched on... > > Can you also confirm this for me? > > Here, this will make it as simple and clear as possible- > (no includes, just pure wysiwyg syntax) > > upload this and hit it once: > > =================================================================== > "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"> > > > > > > > Untitled > > > > foobar="what is foobar anyways?!" > > Note that: <DNA_foobar> (the variable, [foobar], which I > defined just above), has this > value=""
> > > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------< > br /> > why is this foobar text showing up here when [foobar] does not > equal "T"?! > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------< > br /> >
> > > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------< > br /> > And now we have even ruled out <DNA_URL> as the culprit. >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------< > br /> >
> > > > > =================================================================== > > (Not trying to annoy you guys.. or be a pessimist.. just feeling > that our heads together here are better than one (mine alone); I > may need help to workaround something later that I might not know > how to.. especially if I cannot predict a behavior.) > > Let me know any thoughts you have here please. > When I get to a real live issue, I'll mention it, otherwise not again. > > ------------ > John Butler (Govinda) > govinda.webdnatalk@gmail.com > > >
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Hello Govinda! right, got the same as you do. I personnally use [url][/ URL] and only when necessary, meaning only when a statement without these tags will not show what i expect. In my specific case, i almost never use these tags without any side effect. Anyway, we will look into the original code to fix the URL tag inside files. Thank you! - chris On Aug 15, 2009, at 21:48, John Butler wrote: >> Yes, > >> [snip] >> >> however, >> >> [snip] > >> works. >> >> We'll make a note of it, thanks. >> >> Donovan > > Thanks D., > Yes, I worked around that [redirect] OK. > > Still lingering in my mind though, is that other issue I touched on... > > Can you also confirm this for me? > > Here, this will make it as simple and clear as possible- > (no includes, just pure wysiwyg syntax) > > upload this and hit it once: > > =================================================================== > "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"> > > > > > > > Untitled > > > > foobar="what is foobar anyways?!" > > Note that: <DNA_foobar> (the variable, [foobar], which I > defined just above), has this > value=""
> > > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------< > br /> > why is this foobar text showing up here when [foobar] does not > equal "T"?! > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------< > br /> >
> > > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------< > br /> > And now we have even ruled out <DNA_URL> as the culprit. >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------< > br /> >
> > > > > =================================================================== > > (Not trying to annoy you guys.. or be a pessimist.. just feeling > that our heads together here are better than one (mine alone); I > may need help to workaround something later that I might not know > how to.. especially if I cannot predict a behavior.) > > Let me know any thoughts you have here please. > When I get to a real live issue, I'll mention it, otherwise not again. > > ------------ > John Butler (Govinda) > govinda.webdnatalk@gmail.com > > >
christophe.billiottet@webdna.us
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Errata: WCS Newbie question (1997)
triggering an update of two frames (1998)
Problems with [Search] param - Mac Plugin b15 (1997)
PCS Frames (1997)
MacAuthorize and WebMerchant (1997)
Server Problem (2004)
Re:multiple digests, please stop (1997)
So [OT] it's not even funny (2003)
Field name-subcategory (1997)
WebDNA 6.x - what linux distro woudl you use? (was: (2004)
Re:upgrade problem with users.db (1998)
searching for last file in a directory (1999)
WebCat Stuff (2001)
Date comparison using showif (2003)
E-Mail Preferences in Admin Folder (1997)
Another date range search Q (2002)
Encrypted links ... (2000)
multi condition with showif (2005)
no [search] with NT (1997)
Template not found error messages (1997)