Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2010


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 104443
interpreted = N
texte = > I really don't understand why webdna failed to write to the db when I = set the number of iterations to 10,000 and I cannot explain why the = network activity continued (which means data was being received) but the = database writing failed. This is the the mystery that bothers me more = than anything else because it suggests a bigger underlying problem that = may be unusually difficult to diagnose. It's very possible you're trying to open too many sockets. You should = probably try to code defensively, and first check the incoming data = before trying to write the data to your database. Best, Christer Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (Christer Olsson 2010)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? ("Psi Prime Inc, Matthew A Perosi " 2010)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (Brian Fries 2010)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (Govinda 2010)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (Stuart Tremain 2010)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  17. Re: [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (Stuart Tremain 2010)
  18. [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  19. [WebDNA] Some code inside a large loops fail ... but why? (Kenneth Grome 2010)
> I really don't understand why webdna failed to write to the db when I = set the number of iterations to 10,000 and I cannot explain why the = network activity continued (which means data was being received) but the = database writing failed. This is the the mystery that bothers me more = than anything else because it suggests a bigger underlying problem that = may be unusually difficult to diagnose. It's very possible you're trying to open too many sockets. You should = probably try to code defensively, and first check the incoming data = before trying to write the data to your database. Best, Christer Christer Olsson

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Mac: LModelDirector bug fix (1997) Cart questions (1997) off topic (1999) [searchString] (1997) emailer (1997) [/application] error? (1997) psst (1997) # fields limited? (1997) Javascript/WebCatalog form population (2001) [taxrate] question (1997) A multi-processor savvy WebCatalog? (1997) Secure Server not remembering discounts (1998) form data submission gets truncated (1997) Upgrading old WebCat Database Files (1997) http upload (2001) OK, here goes... (1997) Attention all list readers (1997) search form problem.. (1997) Remove a Field from a DB (2007) RE: Missing contexts on NT (1997)