Re: [WebDNA] Re: Need someone to port CakePHP auction site to WebDNA

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2010

It keeps the original formatting. numero = 104683
interpreted = N
texte = This is a multi-part message in MIME format.--------------020808040602050006070708Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowedContent-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printableWe do have auction site code built in webdna. From the amount of time i recall that it took - it may be a good=20starting point.worked out many basic issues with auctioning.It does 4 types of auctions.Most of the functions that eBay had at the time it was built.Have not figured out what to do with it yet.Built years ago - then company did not get funded.Could partner with anyone who wants to build it out orHave considered put it into webDNA corp or community as open source to=20build on.Would be interested in a trade of a license or somethingto open the code.jymDan Strong wrote:> I agree with Donovan.>> -Dan Strong> http://www.DanStrong.com>>> On 2/3/2010 9:55 AM, Donovan Brooke wrote:>> William DeVaul wrote:>>> Perhaps a WebDNA framework should be created? The shopping site is>>> probably the place to start. Lots of things to borrow from other>>> frameworks.>>>>>> We could set up a public github and contribute/fork from there.>>>>>> Bill>>>> WSC already has a source control that is open already. ;-)>>>> Regarding a framework, I think the idea is perhaps putting the cart>> before the horse. I think the first place to start is in purposeful>> function libraries. For example, a realestate themed, or AJAX themed=20>> lib.inc etc.. The goal of a framework is not that much different only=20>> adding complexity with having to learn a framework API.>>>> I don't know that we need that complexity right now. One of the most=20>> marketable things with WebDNA solutions is it's ability to affect the=20>> end goal quickly (because of it's syntax and tool set). That is the=20>> end goal of a framework anyway. I always want to say to my client with>> the most obscure requests...>> "Yes", we could do that. Though a>> framework may help with some projects, once learned.. I think it can=20>> also hinder the versatility that WebDNA innately has.>>>> Anyway, perhaps a framework is in WebDNA's future, but I don't see>> it happening until we have more contributions with function libraries>> and open source (or available) code to get the ball rolling.>>>> my .02=A2>> Donovan>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/> Bug Reporting:=20> http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=3Dtopics&category=3D288>--=20Jym Duane - CTO - Purpose MediaCreating Your Success StoryMarketing : Television - Internet - PrintPhone: (877) 443-1323 =20Email: jym@purposemedia.com =20Web: www.purposemedia.comOregon - www.GuideToOregon.comPO Box 1725, Jacksonville, OR 97530California - www.OrangeCounty.netPO Box 2025, Capistrano Beach, CA 92624--------------020808040602050006070708Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit We do have auction site code built in webdna.
From the amount of time i recall that it took - it may be a goodstarting point.
worked out many basic issues with auctioning.

It does 4 types of auctions.
Most of the functions that eBay had at the time it was built.

Have not figured out what to do with it yet.
Built years ago - then company did not get funded.

Could partner with anyone who wants to build it out or
Have considered put it into webDNA corp or community as open source tobuild on.

Would be interested in a trade of a license or something
to open the code.

jym

Dan Strong wrote:

Iagree with Donovan.

-Dan Strong
http://www.DanStrong.com

On 2/3/2010 9:55 AM, Donovan Brooke wrote:

William DeVaul wrote:

Perhaps a WebDNA framework should becreated? The shopping site is
probably the place to start. Lots of things to borrow from other
frameworks.

We could set up a public github and contribute/fork from there.

Bill

WSC already has a source control that is open already. ;-)

Regarding a framework, I think the idea is perhaps putting the cart
before the horse. I think the first place to start is in purposeful
function libraries. For example, a realestate themed, or AJAX themedlib.inc etc.. The goal of a framework is not that much different onlyadding complexity with having to learn a framework API.

I don't know that we need that complexity right now. One of the mostmarketable things with WebDNA solutions is it's ability to affect theend goal quickly (because of it's syntax and tool set). That is the endgoal of a framework anyway. I always want to say to my client with
the most obscure requests...
"Yes", we could do that. Though a
framework may help with some projects, once learned.. I think it canalso hinder the versatility that WebDNA innately has.

Anyway, perhaps a framework is in WebDNA's future, but I don't see
it happening until we have more contributions with function libraries
and open source (or available) code to get the ball rolling.

my .02¢
Donovan

---------------------------------------------------------
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list <talk@webdna.us>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <talk-leave@webdna.us>
archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us
old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/
Bug Reporting:http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=topics&category=288

Jym Duane - CTO - Purpose Media

Creating Your Success Story

Marketing : Television - Internet - Print

Phone: (877) 443-1323

Email: jym@purposemedia.com

Web: www.purposemedia.com

Oregon - www.GuideToOregon.com

PO Box 1725, Jacksonville,OR 97530

California - www.OrangeCounty.net

PO Box 2025, CapistranoBeach, CA 92624

--------------020808040602050006070708-- Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

[WebDNA] Need someone to port CakePHP auction site to WebDNA (Dan Strong 2010)

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.--------------020808040602050006070708Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowedContent-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printableWe do have auction site code built in webdna. From the amount of time i recall that it took - it may be a good=20starting point.worked out many basic issues with auctioning.It does 4 types of auctions.Most of the functions that eBay had at the time it was built.Have not figured out what to do with it yet.Built years ago - then company did not get funded.Could partner with anyone who wants to build it out orHave considered put it into webDNA corp or community as open source to=20build on.Would be interested in a trade of a license or somethingto open the code.jymDan Strong wrote:> I agree with Donovan.>> -Dan Strong> http://www.DanStrong.com>>> On 2/3/2010 9:55 AM, Donovan Brooke wrote:>> William DeVaul wrote:>>> Perhaps a WebDNA framework should be created? The shopping site is>>> probably the place to start. Lots of things to borrow from other>>> frameworks.>>>>>> We could set up a public github and contribute/fork from there.>>>>>> Bill>>>> WSC already has a source control that is open already. ;-)>>>> Regarding a framework, I think the idea is perhaps putting the cart>> before the horse. I think the first place to start is in purposeful>> function libraries. For example, a realestate themed, or AJAX themed=20>> lib.inc etc.. The goal of a framework is not that much different only=20>> adding complexity with having to learn a framework API.>>>> I don't know that we need that complexity right now. One of the most=20>> marketable things with WebDNA solutions is it's ability to affect the=20>> end goal quickly (because of it's syntax and tool set). That is the=20>> end goal of a framework anyway. I always want to say to my client with>> the most obscure requests...>> "Yes", we could do that. Though a>> framework may help with some projects, once learned.. I think it can=20>> also hinder the versatility that WebDNA innately has.>>>> Anyway, perhaps a framework is in WebDNA's future, but I don't see>> it happening until we have more contributions with function libraries>> and open source (or available) code to get the ball rolling.>>>> my .02=A2>> Donovan>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/> Bug Reporting:=20> http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=3Dtopics&category=3D288>--=20Jym Duane - CTO - Purpose MediaCreating Your Success StoryMarketing : Television - Internet - PrintPhone: (877) 443-1323 =20Email: jym@purposemedia.com =20Web: www.purposemedia.comOregon - www.GuideToOregon.comPO Box 1725, Jacksonville, OR 97530California - www.OrangeCounty.netPO Box 2025, Capistrano Beach, CA 92624--------------020808040602050006070708Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit We do have auction site code built in webdna.
From the amount of time i recall that it took - it may be a goodstarting point.
worked out many basic issues with auctioning.

It does 4 types of auctions.
Most of the functions that eBay had at the time it was built.

Have not figured out what to do with it yet.
Built years ago - then company did not get funded.

Could partner with anyone who wants to build it out or
Have considered put it into webDNA corp or community as open source tobuild on.

Would be interested in a trade of a license or something
to open the code.

jym

Dan Strong wrote:

Iagree with Donovan.

-Dan Strong
http://www.DanStrong.com

On 2/3/2010 9:55 AM, Donovan Brooke wrote:

William DeVaul wrote:

Perhaps a WebDNA framework should becreated? The shopping site is
probably the place to start. Lots of things to borrow from other
frameworks.

We could set up a public github and contribute/fork from there.

Bill

WSC already has a source control that is open already. ;-)

Regarding a framework, I think the idea is perhaps putting the cart
before the horse. I think the first place to start is in purposeful
function libraries. For example, a realestate themed, or AJAX themedlib.inc etc.. The goal of a framework is not that much different onlyadding complexity with having to learn a framework API.

I don't know that we need that complexity right now. One of the mostmarketable things with WebDNA solutions is it's ability to affect theend goal quickly (because of it's syntax and tool set). That is the endgoal of a framework anyway. I always want to say to my client with
the most obscure requests...
"Yes", we could do that. Though a
framework may help with some projects, once learned.. I think it canalso hinder the versatility that WebDNA innately has.

Anyway, perhaps a framework is in WebDNA's future, but I don't see
it happening until we have more contributions with function libraries
and open source (or available) code to get the ball rolling.

my .02¢
Donovan

---------------------------------------------------------
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list <talk@webdna.us>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <talk-leave@webdna.us>
archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us
old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/
Bug Reporting:http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=topics&category=288