Re: [WebDNA] More YouTube Comments

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2010


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 104783
interpreted = N
texte = Hmm... There seems to be an underlying message here. What they wrote: "Syntax in WebDNA makes little sense to a programmer.=20 It's thoughtless and abstract - perfect for non-programmers. Translation: "I don't understand the syntax. I didn't bother to read=20 the documentation. I have a hard time learning languages that don't=20 have a 'Learn in 24 Hours' book." WTW: "WebDNA is also way too proprietary and closed. That's bad for=20 obvious reasons." T: "I pirate my software and profess that 'open' software is the best. =20 However, I've never used another OS besides Windows." WTW: "Plus... I mean, come on. How hokey is this ad? Way to use=20 technical foolery to=EF=BB=BF try and trick non-technical people. That's = kinda=20 low..." T: "I like movies with lots of explosions and visual effects. Plots=20 confuse me." WTW: "Maybe it's just me... But as a professional who programs in=20 multiple scripting languages on a daily basis, and has for over a=20 decade, I prefer PHP (or Ruby)" T: I've stolen code snippets since I was in high school. Now, I've=20 "graduated" to frameworks where I don't have to do a lot of heavy=20 thinking. Photoshop RULZ!" Dan Strong wrote: > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3D0t20QJtFnR8 > > I guess [date] was too thoughtless and abstract :) Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] More YouTube Comments (Dan Strong 2010)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] More YouTube Comments (Matthew Bohne 2010)
  3. [WebDNA] More YouTube Comments (Dan Strong 2010)
Hmm... There seems to be an underlying message here. What they wrote: "Syntax in WebDNA makes little sense to a programmer.=20 It's thoughtless and abstract - perfect for non-programmers. Translation: "I don't understand the syntax. I didn't bother to read=20 the documentation. I have a hard time learning languages that don't=20 have a 'Learn in 24 Hours' book." WTW: "WebDNA is also way too proprietary and closed. That's bad for=20 obvious reasons." T: "I pirate my software and profess that 'open' software is the best. =20 However, I've never used another OS besides Windows." WTW: "Plus... I mean, come on. How hokey is this ad? Way to use=20 technical foolery to=EF=BB=BF try and trick non-technical people. That's = kinda=20 low..." T: "I like movies with lots of explosions and visual effects. Plots=20 confuse me." WTW: "Maybe it's just me... But as a professional who programs in=20 multiple scripting languages on a daily basis, and has for over a=20 decade, I prefer PHP (or Ruby)" T: I've stolen code snippets since I was in high school. Now, I've=20 "graduated" to frameworks where I don't have to do a lot of heavy=20 thinking. Photoshop RULZ!" Dan Strong wrote: > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3D0t20QJtFnR8 > > I guess [date] was too thoughtless and abstract :) Matthew Bohne

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Exists? (1997) One more try (1997) Up-date for Webcatalog 2.0 (1998) Emailer (1997) includes and cart numbers (1997) [WebDNA] Dreamweaver Tag Libraries and Snippets (2011) Search Engines (2002) OT: Microsoft to buy Macromedia? (2002) lookup command (1997) Locking up with WebCatalog... (1997) label?! (2005) [append] (1997) WebCat2b14MacPlugIn - [include] doesn't hide the search string (1997) authenticate and password (1998) Reversing [ipaddress] normalization (1998) WCS Newbie question (1997) Running 2 two WebCatalog.acgi's (1996) WebCatalog host... (2000) Late on Friday.... brain fried (2002) fresh eyes needed. Append won't work. (2000)