Re: [WebDNA] fastcgi 7+ & [cart]?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2010

It keeps the original formatting. numero = 105493
interpreted = N
texte = I have to say that most times I definitely DON'T want the=20?a=3Db stuff included. I think Ken's suggestion has merit.On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 10:53:17 -0500 Kenneth Grome wrote:>> In my opinion, the new behaviour could be a "plus" when=20>>we have to recover variables and it is pretty easy to=20>>strip the extra data out with a small function, this is=20>>why i would be inclined towards keeping the new=20>>behaviour. For instance, and if needed, it will make=20>>possible to use the "back" button from the browser, or=20>>not -your choice- while the older behaviour does not.>=20> I agree with you Chris when you say that it's nice to=20>have a tag that includes the variables. After all, it's=20>a pain in the butt to have to code them in separately.=20> But having *two tags* that we can choose from seems like=20>the ideal alternative to me.>=20> So here's a thought:>=20> Why not keep the old [thisurl] behavior, then add a new=20>[thisurlplus] tag that contains the variables. This=20>gives us the best of both worlds -- backward=20>compatibility as well as a new tag to make including the=20>variables easier.>=20> :)>=20> Sincerely,> Kenneth Grome>=20>=20>=20> ---------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed=20>to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us=A0 Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

I have to say that most times I definitely DON'T want the=20?a=3Db stuff included. I think Ken's suggestion has merit.On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 10:53:17 -0500 Kenneth Grome wrote:>> In my opinion, the new behaviour could be a "plus" when=20>>we have to recover variables and it is pretty easy to=20>>strip the extra data out with a small function, this is=20>>why i would be inclined towards keeping the new=20>>behaviour. For instance, and if needed, it will make=20>>possible to use the "back" button from the browser, or=20>>not -your choice- while the older behaviour does not.>=20> I agree with you Chris when you say that it's nice to=20>have a tag that includes the variables. After all, it's=20>a pain in the butt to have to code them in separately.=20> But having *two tags* that we can choose from seems like=20>the ideal alternative to me.>=20> So here's a thought:>=20> Why not keep the old [thisurl] behavior, then add a new=20>[thisurlplus] tag that contains the variables. This=20>gives us the best of both worlds -- backward=20>compatibility as well as a new tag to make including the=20>variables easier.>=20> :)>=20> Sincerely,> Kenneth Grome>=20>=20>=20> ---------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed=20>to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us=A0 "Terry Wilson"

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Re: [WebDNA] fastcgi 7+ & [cart]?

2010

Top Articles:

Related Readings: