Re: [WebDNA] Downloadable docs

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2011

It keeps the original formatting. numero = 106211
interpreted = N
texte = This is a multi-part message in MIME format.------=_NextPart_000_0086_01CBBE05.31F36620Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1"Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printableYou all bring up good points. I have added this to my to-do list.-DanFrom: Steve Raslevich=20Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 8:40 AMTo: talk@webdna.us=20Subject: Re: [WebDNA] Downloadable docsI would also prefer to have an up-to-date local set of docs. If you are =still going to be creating a user doc .pdf, perhaps keep it up to date =online and send out an email blast to registered users either including =the updated pdf which includes a revision date in it's title or a notice =that a revised doc is now available for download with a link to download =it. And as 7.0 is coming out, note any new tags with (new in 7.0) and =any tags no longer being used in 7 note it as (6.2 only or N/A) so the =same doc can be provide for 6.2 and 7.0 users.Also, it would be really nice if there was a glossary/cross reference =for all tags and operators. The current documentation only lists main =topics. I sometimes spend time looking for exact syntax for some things =that I may not have used for a while. For instance I recently could not =find where to find the correct syntax for "ALLREQD" within the online =docs. I knew it was an abbreviation of ALLREQUIRED but wasn't sure. =After looking in several main topics, beginning with the topic ="searching", in the online docs, I gave up and opened a page where I've =previously used this.StevePsi Prime Inc, Matthew A Perosi wrote:=20 I would also prefer a set of local docs too. Even if I have to download the docs and install them separately. Matt On 1/27/2011 9:15 AM, Kenneth Grome wrote:=20 > We would prefer not provide local docs: one single > operation can update anything in the docs, while local > docs are sometimes stuck for years with outdated > informations. Okay, I guess I can always httrack the docs so I can have my own =local copy, but I won't think about doing this very often once I get my =first copy ... so I'll end up being one of the people with outdated =docs. What would be far better for people like me who frequently develop =offline might be for WSC to generate a new copy of downloadable docs =every time they do something that updates the online docs. Along with =this, a valuable service that emails subscribers (or people on this =list) to tell them that a new version of the docs has been created. This is the type of service that sets excellent companies apart from =the rest. Just my thoughts on the matter ... Sincerely, Kenneth Grome --------------------------------------------------------- This =message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . =To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: =http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: =support@webdna.us=20--=20Matthew A PerosiComputer EngineerSenior Web DeveloperSEO Analyst & EducatorPsi Prime, Inc.323 Union Blvd.Totowa, NJ 07512Service: 973.413.8211Training: 973.413.8214Fax: 973.413.8217http://www.psiprime.com--------------------------------------------------=------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the =mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: =http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: =support@webdna.us=20--------------------------------------------------------- This message =is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To =unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: =http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: =support@webdna.us------=_NextPart_000_0086_01CBBE05.31F36620Content-Type: text/html;charset="iso-8859-1"Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

You all bring up good =points. I have=20added this to my to-do list.

-Dan

From: Steve Raslevich =

Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 8:40 AM

To: talk@webdna.us

Subject: Re: [WebDNA] Downloadable docs

I would also prefer to have an up-to-date local set of =docs. If=20you are still going to be creating a user doc .pdf, perhaps keep it up =to date=20online and send out an email blast to registered users either including =the=20updated pdf which includes a revision date in it's title or a notice =that a=20revised doc is now available for download with a link to download it. =And as 7.0=20is coming out, note any new tags with (new in 7.0) and any tags no =longer=20being used in 7 note it as (6.2 only or N/A) so the same doc can be =provide for=206.2 and 7.0 users.

Also, it would be really nice if there was a=20glossary/cross reference for all tags and operators. The current =documentation=20only lists main topics. I sometimes spend time looking for exact syntax =for some=20things that I may not have used for a while. For instance I recently =could not=20find where to find the correct syntax for "ALLREQD" within the online =docs. I=20knew it was an abbreviation of ALLREQUIRED but wasn't sure. After =looking in=20several main topics, beginning with the topic "searching", in the online =docs, I=20gave up and opened a page where I've previously used=20this.

Steve

Psi Prime Inc, Matthew A Perosi wrote:=20

I =would also=20 prefer a set of local docs too.
Even if I have to download the docs =and=20 install them separately.

Matt

On 1/27/2011 9:15 AM, =Kenneth=20 Grome wrote:=20

> We would prefer not =provide=20 local docs: one single

> operation can update =anything=20 in the docs, while local

> docs are sometimes =stuck for=20 years with outdated

> informations.

Okay, I guess I can =always httrack=20 the docs so I can have my own local copy, but I won't think about =doing this=20 very often once I get my first copy ... so I'll end up being one of =the=20 people with outdated docs.

What would be far better =for people=20 like me who frequently develop offline might be for WSC to generate =a new=20 copy of downloadable docs every time they do something that updates =the=20 online docs. Along with this, a valuable service that emails =subscribers (or=20 people on this list) to tell them that a new version of the docs has =been=20 created.

This is the type of =service that=20 sets excellent companies apart from the rest. Just my thoughts on =the matter=20 ...

Sincerely,

Kenneth=20 Grome
--------------------------------------------------------- =This=20 message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing =list=20 . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: =archives:=20 http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us =Bug=20 Reporting: support@webdna.us=20
--=20Matthew A PerosiComputer EngineerSenior Web DeveloperSEO Analyst & EducatorPsi Prime, Inc.323 Union Blvd.Totowa, NJ 07512Service:   973.413.8211Training:  973.413.8214Fax:       973.413.8217http://www.psiprime.com
---------------=------------------------------------------=20 This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing =list=20 . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: =archives:=20 http://mail.webdna.us/=list/talk@webdna.us=20 Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us=20 =

--------------------=-------------------------------------=20This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing =list=20. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: =archives:=20http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting:=20support@webdna.us------=_NextPart_000_0086_01CBBE05.31F36620-- Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

Re: [WebDNA] Downloadable docs (Stuart Tremain 2011)
Re: [WebDNA] Downloadable docs (Steve Raslevich 2011)
Re: [WebDNA] Downloadable docs (Kenneth Grome 2011)
Re: [WebDNA] Downloadable docs ("Dan Strong" 2011)
Re: [WebDNA] Downloadable docs ("Dan Strong" 2011)
Re: [WebDNA] Downloadable docs (Olin Lagon 2011)
Re: [WebDNA] Downloadable docs ("Gary Krockover" 2011)
Re: [WebDNA] Downloadable docs ("Dan Strong" 2011)
Re: [WebDNA] Downloadable docs (Steve Raslevich 2011)
Re: [WebDNA] Downloadable docs (William DeVaul 2011)
Re: [WebDNA] Downloadable docs ("Psi Prime Inc, Matthew A Perosi " 2011)
Re: [WebDNA] Downloadable docs ("Dan Strong" 2011)
[WebDNA] Downloadable docs (Kenneth Grome 2011)

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.------=_NextPart_000_0086_01CBBE05.31F36620Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1"Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printableYou all bring up good points. I have added this to my to-do list.-DanFrom: Steve Raslevich=20Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 8:40 AMTo: talk@webdna.us=20Subject: Re: [WebDNA] Downloadable docsI would also prefer to have an up-to-date local set of docs. If you are =still going to be creating a user doc .pdf, perhaps keep it up to date =online and send out an email blast to registered users either including =the updated pdf which includes a revision date in it's title or a notice =that a revised doc is now available for download with a link to download =it. And as 7.0 is coming out, note any new tags with (new in 7.0) and =any tags no longer being used in 7 note it as (6.2 only or N/A) so the =same doc can be provide for 6.2 and 7.0 users.Also, it would be really nice if there was a glossary/cross reference =for all tags and operators. The current documentation only lists main =topics. I sometimes spend time looking for exact syntax for some things =that I may not have used for a while. For instance I recently could not =find where to find the correct syntax for "ALLREQD" within the online =docs. I knew it was an abbreviation of ALLREQUIRED but wasn't sure. =After looking in several main topics, beginning with the topic ="searching", in the online docs, I gave up and opened a page where I've =previously used this.StevePsi Prime Inc, Matthew A Perosi wrote:=20 I would also prefer a set of local docs too. Even if I have to download the docs and install them separately. Matt On 1/27/2011 9:15 AM, Kenneth Grome wrote:=20 > We would prefer not provide local docs: one single > operation can update anything in the docs, while local > docs are sometimes stuck for years with outdated > informations. Okay, I guess I can always httrack the docs so I can have my own =local copy, but I won't think about doing this very often once I get my =first copy ... so I'll end up being one of the people with outdated =docs. What would be far better for people like me who frequently develop =offline might be for WSC to generate a new copy of downloadable docs =every time they do something that updates the online docs. Along with =this, a valuable service that emails subscribers (or people on this =list) to tell them that a new version of the docs has been created. This is the type of service that sets excellent companies apart from =the rest. Just my thoughts on the matter ... Sincerely, Kenneth Grome --------------------------------------------------------- This =message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . =To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: =http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: =support@webdna.us=20--=20Matthew A PerosiComputer EngineerSenior Web DeveloperSEO Analyst & EducatorPsi Prime, Inc.323 Union Blvd.Totowa, NJ 07512Service: 973.413.8211Training: 973.413.8214Fax: 973.413.8217http://www.psiprime.com--------------------------------------------------=------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the =mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: =http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: =support@webdna.us=20--------------------------------------------------------- This message =is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To =unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: =http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: =support@webdna.us------=_NextPart_000_0086_01CBBE05.31F36620Content-Type: text/html;charset="iso-8859-1"Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable