Re: [WebDNA] Windows v7
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2011
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 106607
interpreted = N
texte = Hello Stuart! v6.2 already addresses multiprocessors v7 will address multiprocessors In the example you provide, if 6.2 were not multiprocessors savy, it = should run just at half speed (3.6Ghz vs. 1.87GHz) not 12 times slower. = The problem is obvioulsy somewhere else. We have a beta v7 version for Windows which runs but it is not = completely tested yet: Windows versions implies far higher development = costs than UNIX versions. We are dependant on external funding sources. = Luckily, this problem is about to be solved. - chris On May 6, 2011, at 3:42, Stuart Tremain wrote: > =46rom my understanding v6 does not address multi-core processors. >=20 > Is this correct ? >=20 > Will v7 support multi-core processors ? >=20 > When will v7 for windows be available ? >=20 > I have moved a site to a new server and it runs like a dog, the old = server was Pentium D 3.6GHz with 1GB RAM, the new server is Xeon 1.87GHz = with 1GB RAM. The ISP doesn't have any of the old processors left and I = am trying to get this site to work better. It receives a data file every = day that used to process in about 10 mins on the old server, on the new = one it takes up to 2 hours - the client is hopping mad but I can't take = them back to the old server for many reasons that I don't have time to = go into.
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Hello Stuart! v6.2 already addresses multiprocessors v7 will address multiprocessors In the example you provide, if 6.2 were not multiprocessors savy, it = should run just at half speed (3.6Ghz vs. 1.87GHz) not 12 times slower. = The problem is obvioulsy somewhere else. We have a beta v7 version for Windows which runs but it is not = completely tested yet: Windows versions implies far higher development = costs than UNIX versions. We are dependant on external funding sources. = Luckily, this problem is about to be solved. - chris On May 6, 2011, at 3:42, Stuart Tremain wrote: > =46rom my understanding v6 does not address multi-core processors. >=20 > Is this correct ? >=20 > Will v7 support multi-core processors ? >=20 > When will v7 for windows be available ? >=20 > I have moved a site to a new server and it runs like a dog, the old = server was Pentium D 3.6GHz with 1GB RAM, the new server is Xeon 1.87GHz = with 1GB RAM. The ISP doesn't have any of the old processors left and I = am trying to get this site to work better. It receives a data file every = day that used to process in about 10 mins on the old server, on the new = one it takes up to 2 hours - the client is hopping mad but I can't take = them back to the old server for many reasons that I don't have time to = go into.
christophe.billiottet@webdna.us
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
all records returned. (1997)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - More limits on [include] (1997)
Weird variable behaviour (2002)
Or Searches (2004)
Multiple Replaces (1997)
Setting up shop (1997)
Users.db [encrypt seed=????] (1998)
NT [delete] - duh nevermind. (1998)
creating a ShipCosts database (1997)
encryption in browser? (1998)
return two fields w/ [lookup] (1998)
bye bye tax rate (1998)
email preferences on NT (1997)
WC1.6 to WC2 date formatting -FIXED! (1997)
Database (1999)
WC2f3 (1997)
How to get shownext to just shownext once (1997)
Unix DB Permission Error (2002)
Where is f2? (1997)
ShipCost Problems (1998)