Re: [WebDNA] Email time bug? YES, it's a bug!

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2011


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 106747
interpreted = N
texte = I can confirm what Ken is saying here. I too have witnessed other email clients that display the time sent correctly. Marc On 6/14/2011 2:36 PM, Kenneth Grome wrote: >>>> Does WebDNA have a problem setting the correct >>>> time on emails when the server time is set correctly?  > But two other people I worked with this morning (all three > of us in different time zones) received the same WebDNA > emails with the bad Date headers, yet their email clients > displayed the local times correctly. This is apparently > because their email clients ignored WebDNA's bad Date > header, instead favoring the Received header (added by > another SMTP server) as the basis for determining the local > message sent time. > > So my two colleagues were actually seeing the correct times > in their email clients, whereas I was seeing the wrong > times!  > Sincerely, > Kenneth Grome -- ------------------------------------------- Marc Thompson Software Engineer Media Solutions University Information Technology University of Utah 801.585.9264 marc.thompson@utah.edu ------------------------------------------- Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Email time bug? YES, it's a bug! (Marc Thompson 2011)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Email time bug? YES, it's a bug! (Kenneth Grome 2011)
I can confirm what Ken is saying here. I too have witnessed other email clients that display the time sent correctly. Marc On 6/14/2011 2:36 PM, Kenneth Grome wrote: >>>> Does WebDNA have a problem setting the correct >>>> time on emails when the server time is set correctly?  > But two other people I worked with this morning (all three > of us in different time zones) received the same WebDNA > emails with the bad Date headers, yet their email clients > displayed the local times correctly. This is apparently > because their email clients ignored WebDNA's bad Date > header, instead favoring the Received header (added by > another SMTP server) as the basis for determining the local > message sent time. > > So my two colleagues were actually seeing the correct times > in their email clients, whereas I was seeing the wrong > times!  > Sincerely, > Kenneth Grome -- ------------------------------------------- Marc Thompson Software Engineer Media Solutions University Information Technology University of Utah 801.585.9264 marc.thompson@utah.edu ------------------------------------------- Marc Thompson

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Verifying both name and password (was: New Problem) (1997) Interfacing WebMerchant to www.fedex.com (1997) WebCatalog Mac 2.1b3 (1997) WebCatalog Hosting (1996) user selectable sort order (2000) Not reading code (1997) Sort Order on a page search (1997) multi-paragraph fields (1997) USPS Intergration (2001) HTTP header line is too long? (1997) Summing fields (1997) japanese characters (1997) WebDNA 4.5 under IIS6, Win2003 (2003) SKU lookup (1997) Help! WebCat2 bug (1997) (2000) Searching for all records (1998) [OT]: BBEdit grep (2003) Virtual Domains (1998) Striping Characters (1998)