Running _every_ page through WebCat ?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1997


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 10713
interpreted = N
texte = There have been some messages from folks who serve all their pages through WebCat. This certainly isn't what we had originally intended to do, just serve up catalog and ordering type stuff, but the sheer power of WebCat is making it a rather interesting proposition.Before we investigate that possibility in more detail, does anyone have a quantitative estimate of how it would impact overall performance. Even a qualitative estimate would be helpful. We serve up less than 10,000 files per day (with occasional exceptions :-), so we're not a high volume site. However, performance is still an issue as it relates to what the individual visitor sees.Any thoughts ?Thanks, -Sven_____________________________________________________________________ Sven U. Grenander BeeHive Technologies, Inc. http://www.bzzzzzz.com - with a WebCam in Pasadena, California _____________________________________________________________________ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (Sven U. Grenander 1997)
  2. Re: Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  3. Re: Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (Sven U. Grenander 1997)
  4. Re: Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  5. Re: Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (Sven U. Grenander 1997)
  6. Re: Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (grichter@panavise.com (Gary Richter) 1997)
  7. Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (Sven U. Grenander 1997)
There have been some messages from folks who serve all their pages through WebCat. This certainly isn't what we had originally intended to do, just serve up catalog and ordering type stuff, but the sheer power of WebCat is making it a rather interesting proposition.Before we investigate that possibility in more detail, does anyone have a quantitative estimate of how it would impact overall performance. Even a qualitative estimate would be helpful. We serve up less than 10,000 files per day (with occasional exceptions :-), so we're not a high volume site. However, performance is still an issue as it relates to what the individual visitor sees.Any thoughts ?Thanks, -Sven_____________________________________________________________________ Sven U. Grenander BeeHive Technologies, Inc. http://www.bzzzzzz.com - with a WebCam in Pasadena, California _____________________________________________________________________ Sven U. Grenander

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

RE: Nesting [ListFiles] (1998) Three new problems, maybe a fourth (1997) PCS Frames (1997) WebCat2b14MacPlugIn - [include] doesn't hide the search string (1997) RE: WebDNA-Talk searchable? (1997) WebCatalog Upgrade Pricing? (1997) Sort Order on a page search (1997) Re[2]: 2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996) Web Catalog 2 demo (1997) Intermitent problem using [referrer] (1997) [WebDNA] [OT] Social Media Share Buttons (2013) Tea Room trouble (1997) Re:Searching for ALL / empty form field (1997) Problems with shopping cart (1997) This list needs a digest: rant, rave... (1997) Dealer Locator (2008) Garbage display after 100 records (was WebCatalog usage) (1997) transferring values (1998) Help name our technology! (1997) Decrypting a user password (2000)