Re: [WebDNA] Easier to install versions!
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2011
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 107878
interpreted = N
texte = The libraries needed by WebDNA are libmysql openssl java xalan and xerces Only xalan and xerces can be compiled within the distro itself, and = because the OSX version of xalan and xerces are 32bits only, it is the = reason why we are unable to build a 64bits version of WebDNA for OSX. libmysql cannot be compiled because of the SUN license. Same for java.h. The needed openssl version is libssl.so.0.9.8 but new linux distro use = libssl.so.6 Each time a new version of these lib is included in a new linux distro, = we start getting installation problems: we have glibcv2 32bits and = 64bits, glibcv3 32bits and 64bits, some distro will include libmysql15 = and others libmysql16, some will include libssl.so.0.9.8 and others = libssl.so.6 meaning we would theorically have to build 32 different = versions (!)=20 We have been able to unify glibcv2 and glibcv3, and the 7.1 version will = be the same for both. To be library-independant and make 7.1 easy to = install, we removed the dependencies to java, xalan, xerces, and = libmysql. This is why we name it the "light" version and will be meant = to newcomers or those without need for MySQL and/or XSL/XSLT 7.1 versions will be - linux 32bits - linux 64bits - OSX 64bits - Solaris and FreeBSD will be easy to build The current 7.0 will remains for those needing XSL/XSLT and/or MySQL = access, as well as the 6.2 version, until we find a solution to satisfy = anyone. - chris On Dec 31, 2011, at 12:58, Kenneth Grome wrote: >> At this time, we are working on an easier to install=20 >> light version (it will not rely on external libraries=20 >> and there will only be two universal linux versions: >> 32bits and 64bits) >=20 > So you'll package the required libraries in the distro=20 > itself, is this correct? =20 >=20 > This is a GREAT move Chris! This is how I always felt that=20 > WebDNA for Linux should be released, since it eliminates=20 > dependency errors. >=20 > Just one question: >=20 > Using the term "light" suggests that the program's=20 > capabilities may be reduced. Is this true of these new=20 > WebDNA light versions? >=20 > Sincerely, > Kenneth Grome > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list
. > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
The libraries needed by WebDNA are libmysql openssl java xalan and xerces Only xalan and xerces can be compiled within the distro itself, and = because the OSX version of xalan and xerces are 32bits only, it is the = reason why we are unable to build a 64bits version of WebDNA for OSX. libmysql cannot be compiled because of the SUN license. Same for java.h. The needed openssl version is libssl.so.0.9.8 but new linux distro use = libssl.so.6 Each time a new version of these lib is included in a new linux distro, = we start getting installation problems: we have glibcv2 32bits and = 64bits, glibcv3 32bits and 64bits, some distro will include libmysql15 = and others libmysql16, some will include libssl.so.0.9.8 and others = libssl.so.6 meaning we would theorically have to build 32 different = versions (!)=20 We have been able to unify glibcv2 and glibcv3, and the 7.1 version will = be the same for both. To be library-independant and make 7.1 easy to = install, we removed the dependencies to java, xalan, xerces, and = libmysql. This is why we name it the "light" version and will be meant = to newcomers or those without need for MySQL and/or XSL/XSLT 7.1 versions will be - linux 32bits - linux 64bits - OSX 64bits - Solaris and FreeBSD will be easy to build The current 7.0 will remains for those needing XSL/XSLT and/or MySQL = access, as well as the 6.2 version, until we find a solution to satisfy = anyone. - chris On Dec 31, 2011, at 12:58, Kenneth Grome wrote: >> At this time, we are working on an easier to install=20 >> light version (it will not rely on external libraries=20 >> and there will only be two universal linux versions: >> 32bits and 64bits) >=20 > So you'll package the required libraries in the distro=20 > itself, is this correct? =20 >=20 > This is a GREAT move Chris! This is how I always felt that=20 > WebDNA for Linux should be released, since it eliminates=20 > dependency errors. >=20 > Just one question: >=20 > Using the term "light" suggests that the program's=20 > capabilities may be reduced. Is this true of these new=20 > WebDNA light versions? >=20 > Sincerely, > Kenneth Grome > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
christophe.billiottet@webdna.us
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
DataBaseHelper Flawed (1997)
Country & Ship-to address & other fields ? (1997)
Bug? (1997)
Getting Total Quantity (1997)
Rollovers (1999)
[OT] HTML render (2003)
[WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (2009)
Director 7 (1999)
How do I get Google to crawl a WebCat site? (2003)
[WebDNA] Ubuntu 18.04.2 ??? (2019)
WebCatalog2 for NT Beta Request (1997)
WebCatalog 4.0 has been released! (2000)
can webcat determine an image's pixel dimensions? (2000)
Here we go again... (2006)
serial number generation (1997)
[AppendFile] problem (WebCat2b13 Mac .acgi) (1997)
ShowNext truncating passed variable?? (1997)
Doing VALIDCARD right? (1998)
WebCatalog 2.0 b 15 mac (1997)
Re:Emailer and encryption (1997)