Re: [WebDNA] sem_open bugfix for os x version 6.2

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2012


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 108251
interpreted = N
texte = With the hopes that this is encouraging: ------- I am one of the guys who just enjoys the Webdna engine when it works.. = and when it doesn't I leave it to the client and server admins.. and so = duck all the hassle at that level. (not to be smug, bad code is another = story that I DO have to deal with ;-) But this thread just reminds me how over the years there was enough = *seeming* underlying core engine phantom issue(s) that it made many of = us wonder if there was some core bad design/bug in the engine = somewhere.. something(s) deep enough and tricky enough that somehow it = kept eluding the core devs version after version. The "phantom issues" = are the ones where the competent poster swears they fixed everything in = their power.. and yet Webdna keeps crashing from time to time, e.g., = "Nothing changed in 2 years.. and now with little traffic... !@#$% ." I mention this ^^^ not to create any bad feeling (I am STILL here and = love to contribute!), but I mention this just to say that I am GLAD you = guys are talking about the said "sema-four" (or was that "seem-flower"? = ;-) bug.. with the hopes that we eventually get an engine that does not = have any phantom-ness about it. It is unnerving enough that our group = is so small. Good luck making everything solid under the hood! ------- -G= Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] sem_open bugfix for os x version 6.2 (Donovan Brooke 2012)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] sem_open bugfix for os x version 6.2 (Rob 2012)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] sem_open bugfix for os x version 6.2 (Rob 2012)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] sem_open bugfix for os x version 6.2 (Govinda 2012)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] sem_open bugfix for os x version 6.2 (Rob 2012)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] sem_open bugfix for os x version 6.2 (Daniel Meola 2012)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] sem_open bugfix for os x version 6.2 (Donovan Brooke 2012)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] sem_open bugfix for os x version 6.2 (Rob 2012)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] sem_open bugfix for os x version 6.2 (Rob 2012)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] sem_open bugfix for os x version 6.2 (Donovan Brooke 2012)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] sem_open bugfix for os x version 6.2 (Govinda 2012)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] sem_open bugfix for os x version 6.2 (Rob 2012)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] sem_open bugfix for os x version 6.2 (Donovan Brooke 2012)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] sem_open bugfix for os x version 6.2 (Robert Minor 2012)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] sem_open bugfix for os x version 6.2 (Rob 2012)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] sem_open bugfix for os x version 6.2 (Donovan Brooke 2012)
  17. Re: [WebDNA] sem_open bugfix for os x version 6.2 (Rob 2012)
  18. Re: [WebDNA] sem_open bugfix for os x version 6.2 (Rob 2012)
  19. Re: [WebDNA] sem_open bugfix for os x version 6.2 (Rob 2012)
  20. Re: [WebDNA] sem_open bugfix for os x version 6.2 (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  21. Re: [WebDNA] sem_open bugfix for os x version 6.2 (Rob 2012)
  22. Re: [WebDNA] sem_open bugfix for os x version 6.2 (Donovan Brooke 2012)
  23. Re: [WebDNA] sem_open bugfix for os x version 6.2 (Thierry Almy 2012)
  24. Re: [WebDNA] sem_open bugfix for os x version 6.2 (Rob 2012)
  25. [WebDNA] sem_open bugfix for os x version 6.2 (Thierry Almy 2012)
With the hopes that this is encouraging: ------- I am one of the guys who just enjoys the Webdna engine when it works.. = and when it doesn't I leave it to the client and server admins.. and so = duck all the hassle at that level. (not to be smug, bad code is another = story that I DO have to deal with ;-) But this thread just reminds me how over the years there was enough = *seeming* underlying core engine phantom issue(s) that it made many of = us wonder if there was some core bad design/bug in the engine = somewhere.. something(s) deep enough and tricky enough that somehow it = kept eluding the core devs version after version. The "phantom issues" = are the ones where the competent poster swears they fixed everything in = their power.. and yet Webdna keeps crashing from time to time, e.g., = "Nothing changed in 2 years.. and now with little traffic... !@#$% ." I mention this ^^^ not to create any bad feeling (I am STILL here and = love to contribute!), but I mention this just to say that I am GLAD you = guys are talking about the said "sema-four" (or was that "seem-flower"? = ;-) bug.. with the hopes that we eventually get an engine that does not = have any phantom-ness about it. It is unnerving enough that our group = is so small. Good luck making everything solid under the hood! ------- -G= Govinda

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Trouble with carts (2000) [Webcat 2]Next (1997) Single Link browsing (1997) Still having install problems (2000) Date Formats (1997) Time code! (2002) [WriteFile] problems (1997) WC2.0 Memory Requirements (1997) [UPPERCASE] (1997) Prepaid monthly subscription order fulfillment question (2004) It just Does't add up!!! (1997) Shopping Cart Limits? (1998) [OT] Communigate List (2003) WebCat2b12 - nesting [tags] (1997) WebCatalog 2.0 & WebDNA docs in HTML ... (1997) ODBC on Solaris for WebCat. . . (2001) NumFound (1999) Major Security Hole IIS NT (1998) tcpconnect return=? (2003) Expiration of Carts (1997)