Re: [WebDNA] sem_open bugfix for os x version 6.2
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2012
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 108251
interpreted = N
texte = With the hopes that this is encouraging:-------I am one of the guys who just enjoys the Webdna engine when it works.. =and when it doesn't I leave it to the client and server admins.. and so =duck all the hassle at that level. (not to be smug, bad code is another =story that I DO have to deal with ;-)But this thread just reminds me how over the years there was enough =*seeming* underlying core engine phantom issue(s) that it made many of =us wonder if there was some core bad design/bug in the engine =somewhere.. something(s) deep enough and tricky enough that somehow it =kept eluding the core devs version after version. The "phantom issues" =are the ones where the competent poster swears they fixed everything in =their power.. and yet Webdna keeps crashing from time to time, e.g., ="Nothing changed in 2 years.. and now with little traffic... !@#$% ."I mention this ^^^ not to create any bad feeling (I am STILL here and =love to contribute!), but I mention this just to say that I am GLAD you =guys are talking about the said "sema-four" (or was that "seem-flower"? =;-) bug.. with the hopes that we eventually get an engine that does not =have any phantom-ness about it. It is unnerving enough that our group =is so small. Good luck making everything solid under the hood!--------G=
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
With the hopes that this is encouraging:-------I am one of the guys who just enjoys the Webdna engine when it works.. =and when it doesn't I leave it to the client and server admins.. and so =duck all the hassle at that level. (not to be smug, bad code is another =story that I DO have to deal with ;-)But this thread just reminds me how over the years there was enough =*seeming* underlying core engine phantom issue(s) that it made many of =us wonder if there was some core bad design/bug in the engine =somewhere.. something(s) deep enough and tricky enough that somehow it =kept eluding the core devs version after version. The "phantom issues" =are the ones where the competent poster swears they fixed everything in =their power.. and yet Webdna keeps crashing from time to time, e.g., ="Nothing changed in 2 years.. and now with little traffic... !@#$% ."I mention this ^^^ not to create any bad feeling (I am STILL here and =love to contribute!), but I mention this just to say that I am GLAD you =guys are talking about the said "sema-four" (or was that "seem-flower"? =;-) bug.. with the hopes that we eventually get an engine that does not =have any phantom-ness about it. It is unnerving enough that our group =is so small. Good luck making everything solid under the hood!--------G=
Govinda
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Trouble with carts (2000)
[Webcat 2]Next (1997)
Single Link browsing (1997)
Still having install problems (2000)
Date Formats (1997)
Time code! (2002)
[WriteFile] problems (1997)
WC2.0 Memory Requirements (1997)
[UPPERCASE] (1997)
Prepaid monthly subscription order fulfillment question (2004)
It just Does't add up!!! (1997)
Shopping Cart Limits? (1998)
[OT] Communigate List (2003)
WebCat2b12 - nesting [tags] (1997)
WebCatalog 2.0 & WebDNA docs in HTML ... (1997)
ODBC on Solaris for WebCat. . . (2001)
NumFound (1999)
Major Security Hole IIS NT (1998)
tcpconnect return=? (2003)
Expiration of Carts (1997)