Re: [WebDNA] XML Syntax

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2012


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 108502
interpreted = N
texte = Thank you all that responded. Interesting. Frank On Feb 2, 2012, at 8:53 PM, Terry Nair wrote: > Classic for me ...because it is clean, lean and mean ....or in other words > ...I am too damn lazy and old to change when it has not been an issue all > these years. > > Terry D. N. > > -----Original Message----- > From: C. Frank Wolfe [mailto:frank@cwolfe.com] > Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 13:59 > To: talk@webdna.us > Subject: [WebDNA] XML Syntax > > I'm just curious, so an informal survey... > > How many are using the new XML syntax, vs classic WebDNA tags? > Reasons you picked one or the other? > > Thanks, > > Frank > > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list > . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us > > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us > Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] XML Syntax (frank@cwolfe.com 2012)
  2. RE: [WebDNA] XML Syntax (Marc Thompson 2012)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] XML Syntax (Govinda 2012)
  4. RE: [WebDNA] XML Syntax ("Terry Nair" 2012)
  5. [WebDNA] XML Syntax (frank@cwolfe.com 2012)
Thank you all that responded. Interesting. Frank On Feb 2, 2012, at 8:53 PM, Terry Nair wrote: > Classic for me ...because it is clean, lean and mean ....or in other words > ...I am too damn lazy and old to change when it has not been an issue all > these years. > > Terry D. N. > > -----Original Message----- > From: C. Frank Wolfe [mailto:frank@cwolfe.com] > Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 13:59 > To: talk@webdna.us > Subject: [WebDNA] XML Syntax > > I'm just curious, so an informal survey... > > How many are using the new XML syntax, vs classic WebDNA tags? > Reasons you picked one or the other? > > Thanks, > > Frank > > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list > . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us > > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us > frank@cwolfe.com

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Summing fields (1997) Help returning tracking data from USPS website (2004) Error Lob.db records error message not name (1997) WebCat2b15MacPlugin - showing [math] (1997) Did you hear about this? (1997) Exclamation point (1997) Looping through all records (2000) Include a big block of text (1997) Time Zones + GMT (2002) [showif] with ! (2000) Web Catalog vs. ICAT (1997) SiteGuard Use Question (1997) WebCat2 Append problem (B14Macacgi) (1997) Re:listfiles-looking for slick solution (1997) SiteEdit Pro Update Announcement (1997) PIXO support (1997) [shownext] and sort (1998) showif with math? (2000) Emailer errors (2000) Calculating days, hours, minutes ago (2004)