Re: [WebDNA] Better ip address conversion?
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2015
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 111835
interpreted = N
texte = I agree that this tag should give it to us straight. After all, Webdna recei=ves it straight. Why is it converted in the first place? So it can be sorted= alphabetically? That's the only reason I can think of.Sent from my iPad> On Jan 10, 2015, at 9:54 AM, Kenneth Grome
wrote=:>=20> Does anyone have better code than this to convert WebDNA's> [ipaddress] values into real ip addresses?>=20> [getchars start=3D2][!]> [/!][listwords delimiters=3D.&words=3D[ipaddress]][!]> [/!].[math][word][/math][!]> [/!][/listwords][!]> [/getchars][/!]>=20>=20> REQUEST TO WSC:>=20> Please consider creating a new [realIP] tag that gives us ip> addresses in the same standard format that everyone else in the> world uses. You know, a tag we can actually use as-is WITHOUT> having to unmangle the resulting values first?>=20> Regards,> Kenneth Grome> WebDNA Solutions> http://www.webdnasolutions.com> Web Database Systems and Linux Server Management>=20> ---------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
I agree that this tag should give it to us straight. After all, Webdna recei=ves it straight. Why is it converted in the first place? So it can be sorted= alphabetically? That's the only reason I can think of.Sent from my iPad> On Jan 10, 2015, at 9:54 AM, Kenneth Grome wrote=:>=20> Does anyone have better code than this to convert WebDNA's> [ipaddress] values into real ip addresses?>=20> [getchars start=3D2][!]> [/!][listwords delimiters=3D.&words=3D[ipaddress]][!]> [/!].[math][word][/math][!]> [/!][/listwords][!]> [/getchars][/!]>=20>=20> REQUEST TO WSC:>=20> Please consider creating a new [realIP] tag that gives us ip> addresses in the same standard format that everyone else in the> world uses. You know, a tag we can actually use as-is WITHOUT> having to unmangle the resulting values first?>=20> Regards,> Kenneth Grome> WebDNA Solutions> http://www.webdnasolutions.com> Web Database Systems and Linux Server Management>=20> ---------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
Terry Wilson
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
What am I missing (1997)
Trouble with Showif and Search (1998)
WebCat2b12 - nesting [tags] (1997)
Running 2 two WebCatalog.acgi's (1996)
Wanted: Broader string manipulation functions (1997)
Keep away (1997)
Update quantity (2000)
change the number format (1997)
code to phantom spacing (2001)
table max? (2001)
Forumulas.db & Variables (2002)
Re:listfiles-looking for slick solution (1997)
[Case] on OS X (2000)
Resume Catalog ? (1997)
shipCost (1998)
[AppendFile] problem (WebCat2b13 Mac .acgi) (1997)
& in Lookups (1997)
Repost paging through results detail view (2003)
WCS Newbie question (1997)
WebCatalog NT beta 18 now available (1997)