Re: [WebDNA] Better ip address conversion?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2015


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 111835
interpreted = N
texte = I agree that this tag should give it to us straight. After all, Webdna recei= ves it straight. Why is it converted in the first place? So it can be sorted= alphabetically? That's the only reason I can think of. Sent from my iPad > On Jan 10, 2015, at 9:54 AM, Kenneth Grome wrote= : >=20 > Does anyone have better code than this to convert WebDNA's > [ipaddress] values into real ip addresses? >=20 > [getchars start=3D2][!] > [/!][listwords delimiters=3D.&words=3D[ipaddress]][!] > [/!].[math][word][/math][!] > [/!][/listwords][!] > [/getchars][/!] >=20 >=20 > REQUEST TO WSC: >=20 > Please consider creating a new [realIP] tag that gives us ip > addresses in the same standard format that everyone else in the > world uses. You know, a tag we can actually use as-is WITHOUT > having to unmangle the resulting values first? >=20 > Regards, > Kenneth Grome > WebDNA Solutions > http://www.webdnasolutions.com > Web Database Systems and Linux Server Management >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Better ip address conversion? (Terry Wilson 2015)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Better ip address conversion? (Dan Strong 2015)
  3. [WebDNA] Better ip address conversion? (Kenneth Grome 2015)
I agree that this tag should give it to us straight. After all, Webdna recei= ves it straight. Why is it converted in the first place? So it can be sorted= alphabetically? That's the only reason I can think of. Sent from my iPad > On Jan 10, 2015, at 9:54 AM, Kenneth Grome wrote= : >=20 > Does anyone have better code than this to convert WebDNA's > [ipaddress] values into real ip addresses? >=20 > [getchars start=3D2][!] > [/!][listwords delimiters=3D.&words=3D[ipaddress]][!] > [/!].[math][word][/math][!] > [/!][/listwords][!] > [/getchars][/!] >=20 >=20 > REQUEST TO WSC: >=20 > Please consider creating a new [realIP] tag that gives us ip > addresses in the same standard format that everyone else in the > world uses. You know, a tag we can actually use as-is WITHOUT > having to unmangle the resulting values first? >=20 > Regards, > Kenneth Grome > WebDNA Solutions > http://www.webdnasolutions.com > Web Database Systems and Linux Server Management >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us Terry Wilson

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

What am I missing (1997) Trouble with Showif and Search (1998) WebCat2b12 - nesting [tags] (1997) Running 2 two WebCatalog.acgi's (1996) Wanted: Broader string manipulation functions (1997) Keep away (1997) Update quantity (2000) change the number format (1997) code to phantom spacing (2001) table max? (2001) Forumulas.db & Variables (2002) Re:listfiles-looking for slick solution (1997) [Case] on OS X (2000) Resume Catalog ? (1997) shipCost (1998) [AppendFile] problem (WebCat2b13 Mac .acgi) (1997) & in Lookups (1997) Repost paging through results detail view (2003) WCS Newbie question (1997) WebCatalog NT beta 18 now available (1997)