Re: [WebDNA] Exclude found items in a 2nd search
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2016
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 112735
interpreted = N
texte = 318 --Apple-Mail-90C2E214-DD94-4F14-B54D-E7521BD568AF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable But you said you were searching for random results. I don't see how this wou= ld work. You could collect the record IDs from the first search in a cookie, and excl= ude those from the second search, or if on the same page, collect them in a t= ext variable. Terry Sent from my iPad > On Apr 26, 2016, at 5:17 AM, Richard Kwasniewski
wr= ote: >=20 > Well all righty... >=20 > That "startat=3D7" seems to work just fine with that 2nd search/results et= c. >=20 > Thanks >=20 >=20 >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 6:53 AM, Tom Duke wrote:= >> Richard, >>=20 >> Hi - if you have the same search and sorting criteria, then add: >>=20 >> &startat=3D7 >>=20 >> to your second search. >>=20 >> - Tom >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> --------------------------------------------------------- This message is= sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe= , E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporti= ng: support@webdna.us >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- This message is s= ent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E= -mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting:= support@webdna.us --Apple-Mail-90C2E214-DD94-4F14-B54D-E7521BD568AF Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable But you said you were searching for ra= ndom results. I don't see how this would work.
You could collect the record= IDs from the first search in a cookie, and exclude those from the second se= arch, or if on the same page, collect them in a text variable.
Terry
S= ent from my iPad
We= ll all righty...
That "startat=3D7" seems to work j= ust fine with that 2nd search/results etc.
--------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: http://mail.= webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us= --------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us --Apple-Mail-90C2E214-DD94-4F14-B54D-E7521BD568AF-- .
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
318 --Apple-Mail-90C2E214-DD94-4F14-B54D-E7521BD568AF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable But you said you were searching for random results. I don't see how this wou= ld work. You could collect the record IDs from the first search in a cookie, and excl= ude those from the second search, or if on the same page, collect them in a t= ext variable. Terry Sent from my iPad > On Apr 26, 2016, at 5:17 AM, Richard Kwasniewski wr= ote: >=20 > Well all righty... >=20 > That "startat=3D7" seems to work just fine with that 2nd search/results et= c. >=20 > Thanks >=20 >=20 >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 6:53 AM, Tom Duke wrote:= >> Richard, >>=20 >> Hi - if you have the same search and sorting criteria, then add: >>=20 >> &startat=3D7 >>=20 >> to your second search. >>=20 >> - Tom >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> --------------------------------------------------------- This message is= sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe= , E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporti= ng: support@webdna.us >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- This message is s= ent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E= -mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting:= support@webdna.us --Apple-Mail-90C2E214-DD94-4F14-B54D-E7521BD568AF Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable But you said you were searching for ra= ndom results. I don't see how this would work.
You could collect the record= IDs from the first search in a cookie, and exclude those from the second se= arch, or if on the same page, collect them in a text variable.
Terry
S= ent from my iPad