[WebDNA] max number of searches and lookups on a page

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2016


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 112748
interpreted = N
texte = 331 --089e0112c86ed16db90531b30f11 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Just curious. Whats the most lookups and/or searches you've even had on a page. I have a page being worked on that seems to have way tooo many of both so I'm slimming things down with text variables. Seems clunky the way I have it setup now. Currently there 14 searches and 57 lookups or so. I can slim that down to 7 searches, probably no fewer than that, the number of lookups I'm just starting to slim down.... I believe the docs also said the number of text variables is dependent on available ram. Is it bad to have a whole of text variables on a page? I'm guessing if this one page is accessed by many people at once then all those text variables in ram start to add up? That being the case am I better off having more searches and/or lookups than going the text variable route. --089e0112c86ed16db90531b30f11 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Just curious.

Whats the most lookups an= d/or searches you've even had on a page.

I hav= e a page being worked on that seems to have way tooo many of both so I'= m slimming things down with text variables. Seems clunky the way I have it = setup now.

Currently there 14 searches and 57 look= ups or so. I can slim that down to 7 searches, probably no fewer than that,= the number of lookups I'm just starting to slim down....=C2=A0

I believe the docs also said the number of text variables= is dependent on available ram.

Is it bad to have = a whole of text variables on a page?

I'm guess= ing if this one page is accessed by many people at once then all those text= variables in ram start to add up? That being the case am I better off havi= ng more searches and/or lookups than going the text variable route.


--------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us --089e0112c86ed16db90531b30f11-- . Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] max number of searches and lookups on a page (Kenneth Grome 2016)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] max number of searches and lookups on a page ("Matthew A Perosi, Psi Prime" 2016)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] max number of searches and lookups on a page (Richard Kwasniewski 2016)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] max number of searches and lookups on a page (Kenneth Grome 2016)
  5. [WebDNA] max number of searches and lookups on a page (Richard Kwasniewski 2016)
331 --089e0112c86ed16db90531b30f11 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Just curious. Whats the most lookups and/or searches you've even had on a page. I have a page being worked on that seems to have way tooo many of both so I'm slimming things down with text variables. Seems clunky the way I have it setup now. Currently there 14 searches and 57 lookups or so. I can slim that down to 7 searches, probably no fewer than that, the number of lookups I'm just starting to slim down.... I believe the docs also said the number of text variables is dependent on available ram. Is it bad to have a whole of text variables on a page? I'm guessing if this one page is accessed by many people at once then all those text variables in ram start to add up? That being the case am I better off having more searches and/or lookups than going the text variable route. --089e0112c86ed16db90531b30f11 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Just curious.

Whats the most lookups an= d/or searches you've even had on a page.

I hav= e a page being worked on that seems to have way tooo many of both so I'= m slimming things down with text variables. Seems clunky the way I have it = setup now.

Currently there 14 searches and 57 look= ups or so. I can slim that down to 7 searches, probably no fewer than that,= the number of lookups I'm just starting to slim down....=C2=A0

I believe the docs also said the number of text variables= is dependent on available ram.

Is it bad to have = a whole of text variables on a page?

I'm guess= ing if this one page is accessed by many people at once then all those text= variables in ram start to add up? That being the case am I better off havi= ng more searches and/or lookups than going the text variable route.


--------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us --089e0112c86ed16db90531b30f11-- . Richard Kwasniewski

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

access denied problem (1997) can you reassign loop index? (1998) Sorting error (1997) WebCatalog for Postcards ? (1997) WebCat2b13 Command Reference Doc error (1997) Help! WebCat2 bug (1997) Follow-Up to: Removing [showif] makes a big difference in speed (1997) Performance: deafening silence (1999) ShowNext Command (1997) Shopping cart now bad (1997) uninstalling webcatalog (2000) Server Traffic Simulation (1998) Need relative path explanation (1997) typo in docs (2000) Parameter Problem ATTN: Ken Grome (1998) Error Log (2000) Nested vs conditional (1997) RE: E-mailer error codes (1997) Search design (1997) NT Manual (1997)