Re: [WebDNA] Upper ASCII and charset [OT]

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2016


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 112766
interpreted = N
texte = 349 500 domains in a database of ascii text ;-) The temporary solution was simply getting rid of the meta tag.. but I = would rather want to be compliant to today=92s standards. D On May 19, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Francisco Hirsch = wrote: > Why not use the characters directly? >=20 > Francisco Hirsch > --=20 > Lic. Francisco Hirsch > http://www.fiscaldemesa.com.ar >=20 >> On 19 may 2016, at 13:11, Donovan Brooke wrote: >>=20 >> Hello, >>=20 >> hoping someone can educate me on character sets. >>=20 >> I=92m using this file, which has some higher ASCII characters: >>=20 >> ----- >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> Em Dash: [Unurl]%20%97%20[/Unurl]>>=20>> Horizontal Elips: [Unurl]%85[/Unurl]>> 
>> >> >> =97=97 >>=20 >> This doesn=92t parse as-is.. but when you take out: , then it parses. >>=20 >> The problem is that utf-8 is the suggested charset. >> https://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-choosing-encodings >>=20 >> Any thoughts? >>=20 >> Donovan >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us --------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us . Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Upper ASCII and charset [OT] (Donovan Brooke 2016)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Upper ASCII and charset [OT] (Donovan Brooke 2016)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Upper ASCII and charset [OT] (Donovan Brooke 2016)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Upper ASCII and charset [OT] (Tom Duke 2016)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Upper ASCII and charset [OT] (Tom Duke 2016)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] Upper ASCII and charset [OT] (Donovan Brooke 2016)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] Upper ASCII and charset [OT] (Tom Duke 2016)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] Upper ASCII and charset [OT] (Donovan Brooke 2016)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] Upper ASCII and charset [OT] (Francisco Hirsch 2016)
  10. [WebDNA] Upper ASCII and charset [OT] (Donovan Brooke 2016)
349 500 domains in a database of ascii text ;-) The temporary solution was simply getting rid of the meta tag.. but I = would rather want to be compliant to today=92s standards. D On May 19, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Francisco Hirsch = wrote: > Why not use the characters directly? >=20 > Francisco Hirsch > --=20 > Lic. Francisco Hirsch > http://www.fiscaldemesa.com.ar >=20 >> On 19 may 2016, at 13:11, Donovan Brooke wrote: >>=20 >> Hello, >>=20 >> hoping someone can educate me on character sets. >>=20 >> I=92m using this file, which has some higher ASCII characters: >>=20 >> ----- >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> Em Dash: [unurl]%20%97%20[/Unurl]>>=20>> Horizontal Elips: [unurl]%85[/Unurl]>> 
>> >> >> =97=97 >>=20 >> This doesn=92t parse as-is.. but when you take out: , then it parses. >>=20 >> The problem is that utf-8 is the suggested charset. >> https://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-choosing-encodings >>=20 >> Any thoughts? >>=20 >> Donovan >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us --------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us . Donovan Brooke

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

where to put code (1998) Triggers and today's leap day? (2000) Not really WebCat (1997) WebCatalog2 Feature Feedback (1996) WebCat2 - Getting to the browser's username/password data (1997) [WebDNA] Emailer & SMTP (2009) Nesting Search Within Tag? (1997) (2000) Summing fields (1997) Emailed problem (2000) WebCat2 as a chat server? (1997) denied access (1997) RE: File Uploads (1998) [shownext] help (2002) [isfolder] and [filename] (1997) Trouble with formula.db (1997) Simple and Direct Question for SMSI (2002) [Listfiles] vs Netfinder (1997) [ShowIf] and empty fields (1997) code under a [purchase] tag executed when already an Order? (2000)