Re: [Fwd: Rotating Banners ... (was Re: LinkExchange)]

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1997


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 14516
interpreted = N
texte = I agree. There are lots of ways to carefully go out and get data - we should have some in the future as I mentioned.John.>John Hill wrote at 07/11/97 9:16 pm > >>I understand your point, and we've been working on some methods to go out >>and get data remotely, however, the potential for remote data to slow your >>Web site down to a crawl is somewhat scary - especially since you would be >>waiting the remote site before returning a page. The ability to let the >>browser bring in the remote data (using conventional HTML tags) does a >>pretty good job. That being said, I'm sure we will have some options in >>the near future to do this. > >John, > >I absolutely agree, trying to access files from (other) remote sites is a >scary option, and is well demonstrated by some of those using >LinkExchange banners. Not only do you need to have the browser do another >DNS lookup but you also have to worry about whether the remote server is >available and that your target content has not been moved. > >However, I feel it's better for this to be a scary *option*, that the >webadmin can decide to take a risk on or not, than for it not to be >available at all. > >It could for instance be that the admin merely wants to pass some >handling off to another server within his control, this is blocked just >as if he wanted to access something on the other side of the world. > > >-- Clive John A. Hill Pacific Coast Software http://www.smithmicro.com Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
I agree. There are lots of ways to carefully go out and get data - we should have some in the future as I mentioned.John.>John Hill wrote at 07/11/97 9:16 pm > >>I understand your point, and we've been working on some methods to go out >>and get data remotely, however, the potential for remote data to slow your >>Web site down to a crawl is somewhat scary - especially since you would be >>waiting the remote site before returning a page. The ability to let the >>browser bring in the remote data (using conventional HTML tags) does a >>pretty good job. That being said, I'm sure we will have some options in >>the near future to do this. > >John, > >I absolutely agree, trying to access files from (other) remote sites is a >scary option, and is well demonstrated by some of those using >LinkExchange banners. Not only do you need to have the browser do another >DNS lookup but you also have to worry about whether the remote server is >available and that your target content has not been moved. > >However, I feel it's better for this to be a scary *option*, that the >webadmin can decide to take a risk on or not, than for it not to be >available at all. > >It could for instance be that the admin merely wants to pass some >handling off to another server within his control, this is blocked just >as if he wanted to access something on the other side of the world. > > >-- Clive John A. Hill Pacific Coast Software http://www.smithmicro.com John Hill

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Webcat causing crashes left and right! (1997) WebCat Hosting (1998) WebCatalog can't find database (1997) WebDelivery downloads alias, not original ? (1997) Erotic Sites (1997) Disappearing Databases (2000) Webcatalog 4.02b5 Mac OS X headers (2000) Trouble with Netscape (1998) Image size & weight limit on upload (2002) Summing fields (1997) resorting found set (2005) Resume Catalog ? (1997) Lookup Notfound (1998) possible, WebCat2.0 and checkboxes-restated (1997) RED QUESTION MARK (1999) authorizenet and netscape (2002) bannerads example idiot (1997) [OT] SubserviantChicken.com (2004) Emailer choke (1997) Search wbrk word break param (1998)