Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1997


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 15174
interpreted = N
texte = I agree, 2.1b3 seems downright fiesty compared to b2. Could the RAM allocation be too low? It quit on us until we remembered to reset RAM settings on the new version.SandyPat McCormick wrote: > > Karl Schroll wrote: > > > > I installed 2.1b3/Mac after getting a signal raised LModel error again > > with 2.01. 2.1b3 seems to hog the processor and is _very_ slow when > > running all HTML through it. I got lots of gateway application timeout > > messages with it. > > > > I have gone back to 2.01 and the performance is back to normal. > > Karl, > > I had the same experience, but with v2.1b2. I just installed 2.1b3 and it > seems as fast, if not faster than v2.01! I may be losing my mind, but could > you check your version, again, just to be sure? > > Pat McCormick Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow (Karl Schroll 1997)
  2. Re: Dismissing dialogs (was 2.1b3 --> way slow) (Karl Schroll 1997)
  3. Dismissing dialogs (was 2.1b3 --> way slow) (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  4. Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  5. Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow (Sandra L. Pitner 1997)
  6. Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  7. Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow (Sandra L. Pitner 1997)
  8. Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow (Britt T. 1997)
  9. Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  10. Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow (Karl Schroll 1997)
  11. Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow (Pat McCormick 1997)
  12. Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow (Karl Schroll 1997)
  13. 2.1b3 --> way slow (Karl Schroll 1997)
I agree, 2.1b3 seems downright fiesty compared to b2. Could the RAM allocation be too low? It quit on us until we remembered to reset RAM settings on the new version.SandyPat McCormick wrote: > > Karl Schroll wrote: > > > > I installed 2.1b3/Mac after getting a signal raised LModel error again > > with 2.01. 2.1b3 seems to hog the processor and is _very_ slow when > > running all HTML through it. I got lots of gateway application timeout > > messages with it. > > > > I have gone back to 2.01 and the performance is back to normal. > > Karl, > > I had the same experience, but with v2.1b2. I just installed 2.1b3 and it > seems as fast, if not faster than v2.01! I may be losing my mind, but could > you check your version, again, just to be sure? > > Pat McCormick Sandra L. Pitner

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - More limits on [include] (1997) Is [variable] a Number? (2007) shown next / show prev (1998) Case statement (2003) Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (1997) RequiredFields template (1997) How do I specify a & character in Grep? (2000) photo upload snippet (2006) Help formatting search results w/ table (1997) PCS Frames-Default page is solution! (1997) Email within tmpl ? (1997) if else problem (2003) emailer (1997) OK, here goes... (1997) Help formatting search results w/ table (1997) converting characters in form (1997) Using EIMS instead of Emailer (1998) [ShowNext] feature in 2.0 (1997) Sample Tearoom Search Error (1997) WebCat2 as a chat server? (1997)