Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1997


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 15174
interpreted = N
texte = I agree, 2.1b3 seems downright fiesty compared to b2. Could the RAM allocation be too low? It quit on us until we remembered to reset RAM settings on the new version.SandyPat McCormick wrote: > > Karl Schroll wrote: > > > > I installed 2.1b3/Mac after getting a signal raised LModel error again > > with 2.01. 2.1b3 seems to hog the processor and is _very_ slow when > > running all HTML through it. I got lots of gateway application timeout > > messages with it. > > > > I have gone back to 2.01 and the performance is back to normal. > > Karl, > > I had the same experience, but with v2.1b2. I just installed 2.1b3 and it > seems as fast, if not faster than v2.01! I may be losing my mind, but could > you check your version, again, just to be sure? > > Pat McCormick Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow (Karl Schroll 1997)
  2. Re: Dismissing dialogs (was 2.1b3 --> way slow) (Karl Schroll 1997)
  3. Dismissing dialogs (was 2.1b3 --> way slow) (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  4. Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  5. Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow (Sandra L. Pitner 1997)
  6. Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  7. Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow (Sandra L. Pitner 1997)
  8. Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow (Britt T. 1997)
  9. Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  10. Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow (Karl Schroll 1997)
  11. Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow (Pat McCormick 1997)
  12. Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow (Karl Schroll 1997)
  13. 2.1b3 --> way slow (Karl Schroll 1997)
I agree, 2.1b3 seems downright fiesty compared to b2. Could the RAM allocation be too low? It quit on us until we remembered to reset RAM settings on the new version.SandyPat McCormick wrote: > > Karl Schroll wrote: > > > > I installed 2.1b3/Mac after getting a signal raised LModel error again > > with 2.01. 2.1b3 seems to hog the processor and is _very_ slow when > > running all HTML through it. I got lots of gateway application timeout > > messages with it. > > > > I have gone back to 2.01 and the performance is back to normal. > > Karl, > > I had the same experience, but with v2.1b2. I just installed 2.1b3 and it > seems as fast, if not faster than v2.01! I may be losing my mind, but could > you check your version, again, just to be sure? > > Pat McCormick Sandra L. Pitner

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Almost a there but..bye bye NetCloak (1997) Not reading code (1997) search same field twice??? (1999) (no subject) (1997) Open Source (2000) Protect vs Authenicate (1997) Stopping bad HTML propagation ? (1997) bannerads example idiot (1997) Re:quit command on NT (1997) ftp to webstar (2001) Generating Report Totals (1997) Ampersand (1997) Multiple serial numbers (1997) NT version (1997) [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (2010) [append] (1997) Sendmail - Attachment / My First Post (2001) WC2b15 File Corruption (1997) Upgrade to wsV (Email issue) (2004) [format xs] freeze (1997)